A Multi-Laboratory Comparison of Methods for Detection and Quantification of African Swine Fever Virus

被引:4
|
作者
Olesen, Ann Sofie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rasmussen, Thomas Bruun [1 ,3 ]
Nielsen, Soren Saxmose [4 ]
Belsham, Graham J. [1 ,2 ]
Boklund, Anette [4 ]
Ploegaert, Tosca [5 ]
Moonen-Leusen, Bernie [5 ]
Blome, Sandra [6 ]
Botner, Anette [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Denmark, DTU Natl Vet Inst, DK-4771 Lindholm, Kalvehave, Denmark
[2] Univ Copenhagen, Sect Vet Clin Microbiol, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[3] Statens Serum Inst, Dept Virus & Microbiol Special Diagnost, DK-2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Vet & Anim Sci, Sect Anim Welf & Dis Control, DK-1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark
[5] Wageningen Univ & Res, Dept Virol Wageningen Biovet Res, NL-8221 RA Lelystad, Netherlands
[6] Friedrich Loeffler Inst, Inst Diagnost Virol, D-17493 Greifswald, Germany
来源
PATHOGENS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
African swine fever; qPCR; quantification; ring trial; virus infectivity; virus titration; WILD BOAR; CELL-LINE; PCR ASSAY; INFECTION; EXPRESSION; GENERATION; DIAGNOSIS; SURVIVAL; ISOLATE; FIELD;
D O I
10.3390/pathogens11030325
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
African swine fever is a viral disease of the family Suidae. Methods to detect and quantify African swine fever virus (ASFV) include qPCR and virus infectivity assays. Individual laboratories often use in-house procedures for these assays, which can hamper the comparison of results. The objective of this study was to estimate the probability of ASFV detection using these assays, and to determine the inter-test correlations between results. This was achieved by testing a panel of 80 samples at three reference laboratories. Samples were analysed using nucleic acid extraction and qPCR, as well as virus infectivity assays. For qPCR, a very high probability (ranging from 0.96 to 1.0) of detecting ASFV DNA was observed for all tested systems. For virus infectivity assays in cells, the probability of detecting infectious ASFV varied from 0.68 to 0.90 and was highest using pulmonary alveolar macrophages, followed by MARC145 cells, peripheral blood monocytes, and finally wild boar lung cells. Intraclass correlation coefficient estimates of 0.97 (0.96-0.98) between qPCR methods, 0.80 (0.74-0.85) to 0.94 (0.92-0.96) between virus infectivity assays, and 0.77 (0.68-0.83) to 0.95 (0.93-0.96) between qPCR methods and virus infectivity assays were obtained. These findings show that qPCR gives the highest probability for the detection of ASFV.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Laboratory methods to study African swine fever virus
    de Leon, Patricia
    Bustos, Maria J.
    Carrascosa, Angel L.
    VIRUS RESEARCH, 2013, 173 (01) : 168 - 179
  • [2] Current detection methods of African swine fever virus
    Hu, Zhiqiang
    Tian, Xiaogang
    Lai, Ranran
    Wang, Xinglong
    Li, Xiaowen
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [3] Advances in rapid detection methods for African swine fever virus
    Gu, Xinyu
    Yin, Xiyao
    Huang, Luelue
    Hussain, Mubashir
    Ji, Wei
    Zhang, Lijun
    Tang, Yongjun
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2025, 53 (04)
  • [4] Detection and Quantification of African Swine Fever Virus in MA-104 Cells
    Rai, Ayushi
    Pruitt, Sarah
    Ramirez-Medina, Elizabeth
    Vuono, Elizabeth A.
    Silva, Ediane
    Velazquez-Salinas, Lauro
    Carrillo, Consuelo
    Borca, Manuel, V
    Gladue, Douglas P.
    BIO-PROTOCOL, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [5] A multi-laboratory comparison of two molecular methods for the detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile
    Halstead, Diane C.
    Abid, Joan
    Sloan, Lynne
    Meza, Diana
    Ramsey-Walker, Daphne
    Hata, D. Jane
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2016, 10 (01): : 62 - 67
  • [6] NEW METHODS FOR THE LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS OF THE AFRICAN SWINE FEVER
    ARIAS, M
    ROMERO, L
    SANCHEZVIZCAINO, JM
    MAGYAR ALLATORVOSOK LAPJA, 1995, 50 (08) : 475 - 476
  • [7] Editorial: Diagnostics and detection of African swine fever virus
    Zhang, Chengjun
    Li, Shuai
    Zhang, Mengjia
    Li, Yongtao
    Gimenez-Lirola, Luis G.
    Li, Bin
    Li, Wentao
    FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2023, 10
  • [8] Comparison of PCR methods for detection of classical swine fever virus and other pestiviruses
    Podgorska, K.
    Kamieniecka, K.
    Stadejek, T.
    Pejsak, Z.
    POLISH JOURNAL OF VETERINARY SCIENCES, 2012, 15 (04): : 615 - 620
  • [9] Quantification of airborne African swine fever virus after experimental infection
    Ferreira, H. C. de Carvalho
    Weesendorp, E.
    Quak, S.
    Stegeman, J. A.
    Loeffen, W. L. A.
    VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2013, 165 (3-4) : 243 - 251
  • [10] African Swine Fever Virus
    Tulman, E. R.
    Delhon, G. A.
    Ku, B. K.
    Rock, D. L.
    LESSER KNOWN LARGE DSDNA VIRUSES, 2009, 328 : 43 - 87