Plasma-assisted flame stabilization by AC dielectric barrier discharge in burst mode

Compared to the continuous mode of a high-frequency alternating current (HFAC) source, the burst mode is believed to be capable of controlling flow and combustion while saving discharge energy. Thus, the effect of burst mode on plasma-assisted flame stabilization, which is driven by an HFAC source, is investigated based on a plasma manipulation diffusion flame experiment system. A specially designed injector with a coaxial dielectric barrier discharge configuration is used to generate a methane-air diffusion flame and air plasma. The influence of the actuating parameters of the burst mode on plasma flame stabilization and the discharge power consumption are studied. The results show that the plasma injector has the typical volt-ampere characteristics of dielectric barrier discharge. The discharge clearly exhibits regular unsteady operation characteristics when the source is in burst mode. Two flame stability thresholds are found with increasing discharge voltage. According to the first and second flame stability threshold values and the flame pattern, raising the control frequency and the duty cycle is favorable for flame stabilization. However, for a fixed duty cycle of 50%, because the time scale of the actuator-off duration is longer than that of combustion, when the control frequency is too low, the flame cannot be stabilized even though the applied voltage is very high. For a fixed control frequency of 100 Hz, the flame is also difficult to stabilize when the duty cycle is too small. Mainly due to the unsteady gasdynamic effects of plasma in the burst mode, this approach can achieve the same flame stabilization effect as that of the continuous mode while reducing the energy consumption. The cost-effectiveness ratios of the two optimum actuation schemes are only 6.4% and 10.1%. In addition, the burst mode is better than the continuous mode in avoiding undesirable arc discharge. To better stabilize the flame while maintaining a relatively low cost-effectiveness ratio, actuator setting schemes with high frequency and a small duty cycle should be selected.