Model Checking Functional Integration of Human Cognition and Machine Reasoning

被引:0
|
作者
Mercer, Eric [1 ]
Butler, Keith [2 ]
Bahrami, Ali [3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Bionous LLC, Kirkland, WA USA
关键词
Cognitive Modeling; Business Process Modeling; Model Checking; Model-Based Validation; SPIN; Linear Temporal Logic; COVID-19;
D O I
10.1109/SysCon53536.2022.9773873
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Functional integration of human cognition and machine reasoning is an industry-wide problem where failure risks health or safety. Differences in human versus machine functioning obscure conventional integration. We introduce cognitive work problems (CWP) for rigorous, verifiable functional integration. CWP specify the cognitive problem that integrated designs must solve. They are technology-neutral, abstract work objects, allowing people and computing to share and transform them in coordination. The end-to-end method is illustrated on a system that employs AI for remote patient monitoring (RPM) during COVID-19 home care. The CWP specified actionable risk awareness as the medical problem RPM must solve. Graphical modeling standards enabled user participation: CWP as finite state machines and system behavior in BPMN. For model checking, the CWPs logical content was translated to linear temporal logic (LTL) and the BPMN into Promela as inputs to the SPIN model checker. SPIN verified the Promela implements the LTL correctly. We conclude this CWP-derived RPM design solves the medical problem and enhances patient safety. The method appears general to many critical systems.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Theory Is All You Need: AI, Human Cognition, and Causal Reasoning
    Felin, Teppo
    Holweg, Matthias
    STRATEGY SCIENCE, 2024, 9 (04)
  • [42] Animal Cognition: Chimps Use Human Knowledge When Reasoning Statistically
    Roberts, William A.
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2018, 28 (12) : R705 - R706
  • [43] Model checking ontology-driven reasoning agents using strategy and abstraction
    Rakib, Abdur
    Faruqui, Rokan Uddin
    CONCURRENCY AND COMPUTATION-PRACTICE & EXPERIENCE, 2021, 33 (02):
  • [44] GRAVITAS: A model checking based planning and goal reasoning framework for autonomous systems
    Bride, Hadrien
    Dong, Jin Song
    Green, Ryan
    Hou, Zhe
    Mahony, Brendan
    Oxenham, Martin
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2021, 97
  • [45] Probabilistic Model Checking and Non-standard Multi-objective Reasoning
    Baier, Christel
    Dubslaff, Clemens
    Klueppelholz, Sascha
    Daum, Marcus
    Klein, Joachim
    Maercker, Steffen
    Wunderlich, Sascha
    FUNDAMENTAL APPROACHES TO SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, FASE 2014, 2014, 8411 : 1 - 16
  • [46] Incremental deductive & inductive reasoning for SAT-based Bounded Model Checking
    Zhang, L
    Prasad, MR
    Hsiao, MS
    ICCAD-2004: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN, IEEE/ACM DIGEST OF TECHNICAL PAPERS, 2004, : 502 - 509
  • [47] Checking the adequacy of functional linear quantile regression model
    Shi, Gongming
    Du, Jiang
    Sun, Zhihua
    Zhang, Zhongzhan
    JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE, 2021, 210 : 64 - 75
  • [48] Accident Rehearsal Method Based on Functional Model Checking
    Wu, Juyi
    Zhao, Tingdi
    Duan, Guihuan
    Tian, Jin
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2014 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RELIABILITY, MAINTAINABILITY AND SAFETY (ICRMS), VOLS I AND II, 2014, : 1195 - 1199
  • [49] Clinical cognition and diagnostic error: applications of a dual process model of reasoning
    Pat Croskerry
    Advances in Health Sciences Education, 2009, 14 : 27 - 35
  • [50] A situated cognition model for clinical reasoning performance assessment: a narrative review
    Rencic, Joseph
    Schuwirth, Lambert W. T.
    Gruppen, Larry D.
    Durning, Steven J.
    DIAGNOSIS, 2020, 7 (03) : 227 - 240