A Comparison of Physical Therapy Protocols Between Open Latarjet Coracoid Transfer and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

被引:9
|
作者
Beletsky, Alexander [1 ]
Cancienne, Jourdan M. [2 ]
Manderle, Brandon J. [1 ]
Mehta, Nabil [1 ]
Wilk, Kevin E. [3 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Div Sports Med, Midwest Orthopaed Rush, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Southern Orthopaed Specialists New Orleans, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Amer Sports Med Inst, Champ Sports Med, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
关键词
Latarjet; Bankart; rehabilitation; return to sport; shoulder instability; REHABILITATION GUIDELINE; SHOULDER INSTABILITY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; BONE;
D O I
10.1177/1941738119887396
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Recent studies examining return to sport after traumatic shoulder instability suggest faster return-to-sport time lines after bony stabilization when compared with soft tissue stabilization. The purpose of the current study was to define variability across online Latarjet rehabilitation protocols and to compare Latarjet with Bankart repair rehabilitation time lines. Evidence Acquisition: Online searches were utilized to identify publicly available rehabilitation protocols from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited academic orthopaedic surgery programs. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Results: Of the 183 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic programs reviewed, 14 institutions (7.65%) had publicly available rehabilitation protocols. A web-based search yielded 17 additional protocols from private sports medicine practices. Of the 31 protocols included, 31 (100%) recommended postoperative sling use and 26 (84%) recommended elbow, wrist, and hand range of motion exercises. Full passive forward flexion goals averaged 3.22 +/- 2.38 weeks postoperatively, active range of motion began on average at 5.22 +/- 1.28 weeks, and normal scapulothoracic motion by 9.26 +/- 4.8 weeks postoperatively. Twenty (65%) protocols provided specific recommendations for return to nonoverhead sport-specific activities, beginning at an average of 17 +/- 2.8 weeks postoperatively. This was compared with overhead sports or throwing activities, for which 18 (58%) of protocols recommended beginning at a similar average of 17.1 +/- 3.3 weeks. Conclusion: Similar to Bankart repair protocols, Latarjet rehabilitation protocols contain a high degree of variability with regard to exercises and motion goal recommendations. However, many milestones and start dates occur earlier in Latarjet protocols when compared with Bankart-specific protocols. Consequently, variability in the timing of rehabilitation goals may contribute to earlier return to play metrics identified in the broader literature for the Latarjet procedure when compared with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): Level C.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 131
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)—clinical results at short term follow-up
    Bartłomiej Kordasiewicz
    Konrad Małachowski
    Maciej Kicinski
    Sławomir Chaberek
    Stanisław Pomianowski
    International Orthopaedics, 2017, 41 : 1023 - 1033
  • [42] No Difference Between Anchorless and Traditional Suture Anchors in Arthroscopic Bankart Repair: A Clinical Comparison
    Haase, Lucas
    Wise, Kelsey
    Kelly, Brandon
    Harris, John
    Macalena, Jeffrey
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 14 (07)
  • [43] A hybrid open-arthroscopic latarjet coracoid bone-block technique using "HyLa" instrumentation
    Lami, Damien
    Fauvet, Nicolas
    Ollivier, Matthieu
    Argenson, Jean-Noel
    Grillo, Jean-Charles
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2021, 107 (05)
  • [44] The Fate of Coracoid Graft after Latarjet Procedure: Arthroscopic and Open Findings of Graft Union and Glenoid Remodelling
    Nizlan, Mohd
    Kiat, Raymond Yeak Dieu
    Rashid, Ahmad Hisham
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2022, 32 (10): : 1356 - 1359
  • [45] Management of an engaging Hill-Sachs lesion: arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair versus Latarjet procedure
    Cho, Nam Su
    Yoo, Jae Hyun
    Rhee, Yong Girl
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (12) : 3793 - 3800
  • [46] Can We Conclude That the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair and Open Latarjet Procedure Show Similar Rates of Return to Play and How Should This Conclusion Be Interpreted?
    van Iersel, Theodore P.
    Verweij, Lukas P. E.
    van den Bekerom, Michel P. J.
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2024, 40 (03): : 655 - 657
  • [47] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Bristow-Latarjet for Shoulder Instability: A Matched-Pair Multicenter Study Focused on Return to Sport
    Blonna, Davide
    Bellato, Enrico
    Caranzano, Francesco
    Assom, Marco
    Rossi, Roberto
    Castoldi, Filippo
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2016, 44 (12): : 3198 - 3205
  • [48] Arthroscopic versus open bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability
    Cole, BJ
    Warner, JJP
    CLINICS IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2000, 19 (01) : 19 - +
  • [49] Comparison of Outcomes between Open and Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair
    Menekse, Serdar
    ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDICS, 2024, 2024
  • [50] Arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet Combined With Bankart Repair (2B3 Procedure): Tips and Tricks
    Boileau, Pascal
    Thelu, Charles-Edouard
    OPERATIVE TECHNIQUES IN SPORTS MEDICINE, 2013, 21 (04) : 246 - 253