A Comparison of Physical Therapy Protocols Between Open Latarjet Coracoid Transfer and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

被引:9
|
作者
Beletsky, Alexander [1 ]
Cancienne, Jourdan M. [2 ]
Manderle, Brandon J. [1 ]
Mehta, Nabil [1 ]
Wilk, Kevin E. [3 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Div Sports Med, Midwest Orthopaed Rush, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Southern Orthopaed Specialists New Orleans, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Amer Sports Med Inst, Champ Sports Med, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
关键词
Latarjet; Bankart; rehabilitation; return to sport; shoulder instability; REHABILITATION GUIDELINE; SHOULDER INSTABILITY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; BONE;
D O I
10.1177/1941738119887396
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Recent studies examining return to sport after traumatic shoulder instability suggest faster return-to-sport time lines after bony stabilization when compared with soft tissue stabilization. The purpose of the current study was to define variability across online Latarjet rehabilitation protocols and to compare Latarjet with Bankart repair rehabilitation time lines. Evidence Acquisition: Online searches were utilized to identify publicly available rehabilitation protocols from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited academic orthopaedic surgery programs. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Results: Of the 183 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic programs reviewed, 14 institutions (7.65%) had publicly available rehabilitation protocols. A web-based search yielded 17 additional protocols from private sports medicine practices. Of the 31 protocols included, 31 (100%) recommended postoperative sling use and 26 (84%) recommended elbow, wrist, and hand range of motion exercises. Full passive forward flexion goals averaged 3.22 +/- 2.38 weeks postoperatively, active range of motion began on average at 5.22 +/- 1.28 weeks, and normal scapulothoracic motion by 9.26 +/- 4.8 weeks postoperatively. Twenty (65%) protocols provided specific recommendations for return to nonoverhead sport-specific activities, beginning at an average of 17 +/- 2.8 weeks postoperatively. This was compared with overhead sports or throwing activities, for which 18 (58%) of protocols recommended beginning at a similar average of 17.1 +/- 3.3 weeks. Conclusion: Similar to Bankart repair protocols, Latarjet rehabilitation protocols contain a high degree of variability with regard to exercises and motion goal recommendations. However, many milestones and start dates occur earlier in Latarjet protocols when compared with Bankart-specific protocols. Consequently, variability in the timing of rehabilitation goals may contribute to earlier return to play metrics identified in the broader literature for the Latarjet procedure when compared with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): Level C.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 131
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Basic morphological characteristics of coracoid grafts obtained by open and arthroscopic Latarjet techniques: A comparative study
    Minuesa-Asensio, Alvaro
    Garcia-Esteo, Francisco
    Ramon Merida-Velasco, Jose
    Barrio-Asensio, Carmen
    de la Cuadra-Blanco, Crotida
    Murillo-Gonzalez, Jorge
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2020, 106 (06) : 1083 - 1087
  • [32] Long-term Results of the Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Older Than 40 Years: A Comparison With the Open Latarjet Procedure
    Ernstbrunner, Lukas
    De Nard, Bianca
    Olthof, Maurits
    Beeler, Silvan
    Bouaicha, Samy
    Gerber, Christian
    Wieser, Karl
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (09): : 2090 - 2096
  • [33] Previous arthroscopic Bankart repair is an independent risk factor for an inferior outcome after Latarjet procedure
    Flinkkila, Tapio
    Knape, Rony
    Nevalainen, Mika
    Sirnio, Kai
    Ohtonen, Pasi
    Leppilahti, Juhana
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2019, 105 (08) : 1481 - 1485
  • [34] Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis
    Cunningham, G.
    Benchouk, S.
    Kherad, O.
    Laedermann, A.
    KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY, 2016, 24 (02) : 540 - 545
  • [35] Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis
    G. Cunningham
    S. Benchouk
    O. Kherad
    A. Lädermann
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 540 - 545
  • [36] Transfer of the coracoid process in recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder joint. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure
    Agneskirchner, J. D.
    Lafosse, L.
    OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE, 2014, 26 (03): : 296 - 306
  • [37] The cost-effectiveness of the arthroscopic Bankart versus open Latarjet in the treatment of primary shoulder instability
    Min, Kyong
    Fedorka, Catherine
    Solberg, Muriel J.
    Shaha, Steven H.
    Higgins, Laurence D.
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 27 (06) : S2 - S9
  • [38] Management of an engaging Hill–Sachs lesion: arthroscopic remplissage with Bankart repair versus Latarjet procedure
    Nam Su Cho
    Jae Hyun Yoo
    Yong Girl Rhee
    Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 2016, 24 : 3793 - 3800
  • [39] Comparison of Return to Sports and Competition After the Arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet Procedure Versus Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Adolescents With Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Rosello, Olivier
    Barret, Hugo
    Langlais, Tristan
    Boileau, Pascal
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (06): : 1457 - 1463
  • [40] Comparative study of open and arthroscopic coracoid transfer for shoulder anterior instability (Latarjet)-clinical results at short term follow-up
    Kordasiewicz, Bartlomiej
    Malachowski, Konrad
    Kicinski, Maciej
    Chaberek, Slawomir
    Pomianowski, Stanislaw
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2017, 41 (05) : 1023 - 1033