A Comparison of Physical Therapy Protocols Between Open Latarjet Coracoid Transfer and Arthroscopic Bankart Repair

被引:9
|
作者
Beletsky, Alexander [1 ]
Cancienne, Jourdan M. [2 ]
Manderle, Brandon J. [1 ]
Mehta, Nabil [1 ]
Wilk, Kevin E. [3 ]
Verma, Nikhil N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Div Sports Med, Midwest Orthopaed Rush, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Southern Orthopaed Specialists New Orleans, New Orleans, LA USA
[3] Amer Sports Med Inst, Champ Sports Med, Birmingham, AL USA
来源
关键词
Latarjet; Bankart; rehabilitation; return to sport; shoulder instability; REHABILITATION GUIDELINE; SHOULDER INSTABILITY; AMERICAN SOCIETY; BONE;
D O I
10.1177/1941738119887396
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Context: Recent studies examining return to sport after traumatic shoulder instability suggest faster return-to-sport time lines after bony stabilization when compared with soft tissue stabilization. The purpose of the current study was to define variability across online Latarjet rehabilitation protocols and to compare Latarjet with Bankart repair rehabilitation time lines. Evidence Acquisition: Online searches were utilized to identify publicly available rehabilitation protocols from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited academic orthopaedic surgery programs. Study Design: Descriptive epidemiology study. Results: Of the 183 ACGME-accredited orthopaedic programs reviewed, 14 institutions (7.65%) had publicly available rehabilitation protocols. A web-based search yielded 17 additional protocols from private sports medicine practices. Of the 31 protocols included, 31 (100%) recommended postoperative sling use and 26 (84%) recommended elbow, wrist, and hand range of motion exercises. Full passive forward flexion goals averaged 3.22 +/- 2.38 weeks postoperatively, active range of motion began on average at 5.22 +/- 1.28 weeks, and normal scapulothoracic motion by 9.26 +/- 4.8 weeks postoperatively. Twenty (65%) protocols provided specific recommendations for return to nonoverhead sport-specific activities, beginning at an average of 17 +/- 2.8 weeks postoperatively. This was compared with overhead sports or throwing activities, for which 18 (58%) of protocols recommended beginning at a similar average of 17.1 +/- 3.3 weeks. Conclusion: Similar to Bankart repair protocols, Latarjet rehabilitation protocols contain a high degree of variability with regard to exercises and motion goal recommendations. However, many milestones and start dates occur earlier in Latarjet protocols when compared with Bankart-specific protocols. Consequently, variability in the timing of rehabilitation goals may contribute to earlier return to play metrics identified in the broader literature for the Latarjet procedure when compared with arthroscopic Bankart repair. Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT): Level C.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 131
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Physical Therapy Protocols for Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    DeFroda, Steven F.
    Mehta, Nabil
    Owens, Brett D.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2018, 10 (03): : 250 - 258
  • [2] Open Latarjet procedure for failed arthroscopic Bankart repair
    Flinkkila, T.
    Sirnio, K.
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2015, 101 (01) : 35 - 38
  • [3] Association Between Preoperative Glenoid Bone Loss and Postoperative Outcomes After Coracoid Transfer Combined With Open Bankart Repair: Comparison of the Bristow and Latarjet Techniques
    Hirose, Takehito
    Tanaka, Makoto
    Nakai, Hidekazu
    Hanai, Hiroto
    Kotani, Yuki
    Kuratani, Kosuke
    Hayashida, Kenji
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2023, 11 (05)
  • [4] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for Recurrent Shoulder Instability in Athletes
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Davey, Martin S.
    Montgomery, Connor
    O'Doherty, Ross
    Gaafar, Mohamed
    Pauzenberger, Leo
    Mullett, Hannan
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [5] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Versus Open Latarjet for First-Time Dislocators in Athletes
    Hurley, Eoghan T.
    Davey, Martin S.
    Montgomery, Connor
    O'Doherty, Ross
    Gaafar, Mohamed
    Pauzenberger, Leo
    Mullett, Hannan
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (08)
  • [6] Arthroscopic Latarjet Procedure Combined With Bankart Repair: A Technique Using 2 Cortical Buttons and Specific Glenoid and Coracoid Guides
    Valenti, Philippe
    Maroun, Charbel
    Wagner, Eric
    Werthel, Jean-David
    ARTHROSCOPY TECHNIQUES, 2018, 7 (04): : E313 - E320
  • [7] The Open Latarjet Procedure Is More Reliable in Terms of Shoulder Stability Than Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    Bessiere, Charles
    Trojani, Christophe
    Carles, Michel
    Mehta, Saurabh S.
    Boileau, Pascal
    CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2014, 472 (08) : 2345 - 2351
  • [8] Outcomes of Arthroscopic Latarjet as a Revision Surgery After Failed Arthroscopic Bankart Repair
    Calvo, Emilio
    Dzidzishvili, Lika
    Valencia, Maria
    Calvo, Claudio
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (01): : 190 - 200
  • [9] Comparative study of arthroscopic Bankart repair versus open Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder dislocation
    Rai, Saroj
    Tamang, Nira
    Sharma, Laxmi Kanta
    Marasini, Rudra Prasad
    Singh, Janith Lal
    Khanal, Kiran
    Ghimire KC, Milan
    Sherchan, Binod
    JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 49 (04)
  • [10] Comparison of Coracoid Graft Position and Fixation in the Open Versus Arthroscopic Latarjet Techniques: A Cadaveric Study
    Minuesa-Asensio, Alvaro
    Garcia-Esteo, Francisco
    Merida-Velasco, Jose Ramon
    Barrio-Asensio, Carmen
    Lopez-Fernandez, Pedro
    Aramberri-Gutierrez, Mikel
    Murillo-Gonzalez, Jorge
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2020, 48 (09): : 2105 - 2114