Diagnostic performance and validation of autoantibody testing in myositis by a commercial line blot assay

被引:125
|
作者
Ghirardello, Anna [1 ]
Rampudda, Mariaelisa [1 ]
Ekholm, Louise [2 ,3 ]
Bassi, Nicola [1 ]
Tarricone, Elena [1 ]
Zampieri, Sandra [1 ]
Zen, Margherita [1 ]
Vattemi, Gaetano A. [4 ]
Lundberg, Ingrid E. [2 ,3 ]
Doria, Andrea [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Padua, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Div Rheumatol, I-35128 Padua, Italy
[2] Karolinska Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Rheumatoloy Unit, Solna, Sweden
[3] Karolinska Inst, Stockholm, Sweden
[4] Univ Verona, Dept Neurol & Opt Sci, Clin Neurol Sect, I-37100 Verona, Italy
关键词
Autoimmune myositis; Myositis-specific autoantibodies; Serological methods; Diagnostic accuracy; Immunoprecipitation; Immunoblot; Line blot; ANTI-KU ANTIBODIES; CLASSIFICATION; INFECTIONS; UTILITY;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/keq281
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Methods. IgG antibodies against Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, PM/Scl, Ku, Mi-2 and Ro52 antigens were detected by a line blot and in-house RNA immunoprecipitation or immunoblot. We tested sera from 208 IIM patients, 50 healthy subjects and 180 control patients (11 non-autoimmune myopathy, 23 muscular dystrophy, 11 UCTD, 68 SLE, 36 SSc, 22 SS and 9 arthropathy). Results. MSAs or MAAs were detected in 98 (47%) out of the 208 IIM patients by line blot: anti-Jo-1 in 43 (21%), anti-PL-7 or anti-PL-12 in 8 (4%), anti-Mi-2 in 9 (4%), anti-PM/Scl in 9 (4%), anti-Ku in 10 (5%) and anti-Ro52 in 49 (24%). Overall specificity was: 100% for anti-Jo-1, anti-PL-7 or PL-12 and anti-PM/Scl; 96% for anti-Ku; 98% for anti-Mi-2; and 76% for anti-Ro52. In-house testing confirmed line blot results regarding anti-Jo-1, anti-PM/Scl and anti-Ku, while it was more accurate than line blot in detecting anti-Mi-2 (7 vs 4% sensitivity, 100 vs 98% specificity), and anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (anti-ARS) non-Jo-1 antibodies (11 vs 4% sensitivity, 97 vs 99% specificity). Conclusions. Line blot could be a suitable serological test in the diagnostic workup for myositis, and it represents a reliable alternative to more time-consuming procedures. Continuous effort is recommended in order to improve its accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:2370 / 2374
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Diagnostic utility of anti-cN1A autoantibody testing in sporadic inclusion body myositis
    Al-Attar, Mariam
    Khoo, Thomas
    Lilleker, James B.
    Chinoy, Hector
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2024, 63
  • [22] A Commercial Anti-TIF1γ ELISA Is Superior to Line and Dot Blot and Should Be Considered as Part of Routine Myositis-Specific Antibody Testing
    Mulhearn, Ben
    Li, Danyang
    McMorrow, Fionnuala
    Lu, Hui
    McHugh, Neil J.
    Tansley, Sarah L.
    FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [23] Validation of a commercial line blot for the detection of serum anti-Ro60 autoantibodies
    Lee, Adrian Y. S.
    Beroukas, Dimitra
    Wienholt, Louise
    Gordon, Tom P.
    PATHOLOGY, 2022, 54 (07) : 900 - 903
  • [24] Positive predictive value of myositis antibody line blot testing in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy
    Chang, Yiu-Chia
    Yang, Liju
    Budhram, Adrian
    MUSCLE & NERVE, 2024, 69 (05) : 626 - 630
  • [25] Clinical Significance of Higher Cutoffs for Myositis Autoantibody Positivity Using the Euroimmun Research Line Blot: Comment on the Article by Mecoli et al
    Zampeli, Evangelia
    Cinoku, Ilir I.
    Mavragani, Clio P.
    Skopouli, Fotini N.
    Moutsopoulos, Haralampos M.
    ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATOLOGY, 2020, 72 (06) : 1042 - 1044
  • [26] Comparison of autoantibody specificities tested by a line blot assay and immunoprecipitation-based algorithm in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies
    Espinosa-Ortega, Fabricio
    Holmqvist, Marie
    Alexanderson, Helene
    Storfors, Helena
    Mimori, Tsuneyo
    Lundberg, Ingrid E.
    Ronnelid, Johan
    ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 2019, 78 (06) : 858 - +
  • [27] Diagnostic Performance of an Anti-Actin Autoantibody Binding Enzyme Immunodot Blot in Autoimmune Hepatitis Type 1
    Schotte, Heiko
    Willeke, Peter
    Schmalhorst, Johanna
    Schlueter, Bernhard
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2016, 30 (02) : 123 - 129
  • [28] Positioning of myositis-specific and associated autoantibody (MSA/MAA) testing in disease criteria and routine diagnostic work-up
    Bonroy, Carolien
    Piette, Yves
    Allenbach, Yves
    Bossuyt, Xavier
    Damoiseaux, Jan
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL AUTOIMMUNITY, 2022, 5
  • [29] Comparative assessment of the diagnostic performances of particle-based multianalyte technology and commercial ELISA for antiphospholipid autoantibody testing
    Saadalla, Abdulrahman
    Novis, Camille L.
    Banerjee, Dipanwita
    Martins, Tom
    Holloway, Brooke
    Aure, Mary Ann
    Mahler, Michael
    Nandakumar, Vijayalakshmi
    CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2024, 562
  • [30] Multiplex PCR-based reverse line blot hybridization assay (mPCR/RLB) - a practical epidemiological and diagnostic tool
    Kong, Fanrong
    Gilbert, Gwendolyn L.
    NATURE PROTOCOLS, 2006, 1 (06) : 2668 - 2680