Comparative study of NCHRP Report 472 with the current AASHTO seismic specifications

被引:0
|
作者
Khan, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] STV Inc, Trenton, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Recently published NCHRP Report 472 has recommended major changes, which appear to have an economic impact on the cost of bridges. This paper is presented in two steps, review of the current (mandatory) and review of the future (proposed) specifications. It firstly reviews differences in currently used AASHTO Load Factor Design (LFD) and Load Resistance Factor Design (LR-FD) specifications as applied to actual straight, skew and curved bridges. The paper discusses the proposed changes recommended by Report 472 from the current AASHTO seismic specifications. In future, the classification of bridge categories will be performance based. Emphasis will be rightly placed on pushover analysis, ductility, use of new soil site factors, liquefaction effects and loss of bearing capacity during seismic event. Certain difficulties need to be overcome to implement the new recommendations. The structural engineer needs training in structural dynamics, geotechnical engineering, computer softwares and seismic detailing. This may require developing, new courses at university level, continuing education courses and holding suitable examinations for licensure.
引用
下载
收藏
页码:141 / 147
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A COMPARATIVE STUDY FOR ADVANCED SEISMIC VIBRATION CONTROL ALGORITHMS
    Patrascu, Monica
    Dumitrache, Ioan
    Patrut, Petre
    UNIVERSITY POLITEHNICA OF BUCHAREST SCIENTIFIC BULLETIN SERIES C-ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2012, 74 (04): : 3 - 16
  • [32] A comparative study of seismic tomography models of Southwest China
    Xuezhen Zhang
    Xiaodong Song
    Feiyi Wang
    Earthquake Science, 2023, 36 (01) : 15 - 39
  • [33] Current diversity in radiology: A comparative study
    Hassankhani, Amir
    Amoukhteh, Melika
    Valizadeh, Parya
    Jannatdoust, Payam
    Ghadimi, Delaram J.
    Johnston, Jennifer H.
    Vasavada, Pauravi S.
    Walker, Daphne K.
    Gholamrezanezhad, Ali
    CLINICAL IMAGING, 2024, 113
  • [34] Comparative Study of Seismic Design for Different Bridges Structures
    Naser, Ali Fadhil
    JURNAL KEJURUTERAAN, 2022, 34 (01): : 59 - 71
  • [35] A comparative study of two models for the seismic analysis of buildings
    Luevanos, A.
    INGENIERIA E INVESTIGACION, 2012, 32 (03): : 37 - 41
  • [36] A comparative study of seismic tomography models of Southwest China
    Zhang, Xuezhen
    Song, Xiaodong
    Wang, Feiyi
    EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2023, 36 (01) : 15 - 39
  • [37] Buildings’ seismic vulnerability assessment methods: a comparative study
    N. Alam
    M. Shahria Alam
    S. Tesfamariam
    Natural Hazards, 2012, 62 : 405 - 424
  • [38] Comparative study of seismic response of steel frame structures
    Marusic, D
    Fajfar, P
    STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1999, : 1159 - 1164
  • [39] A COMPARATIVE SEISMIC HAZARD STUDY FOR AZERBAIJAN PROVINCE IN IRAN
    ROWSHANDEL, B
    NEMATNASSER, S
    COROTIS, RB
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1981, 71 (01) : 335 - 362
  • [40] Comparative Study on the Use of Output Specifications for Australian and UK PPP/PFI Projects
    Lam, Patrick T. I.
    Javed, Arshad Ali
    JOURNAL OF PERFORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTED FACILITIES, 2015, 29 (02)