A comparative study of seismic tomography models of Southwest China

被引:1
|
作者
Zhang, Xuezhen [1 ,2 ]
Song, Xiaodong [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Feiyi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Earth & Space Sci, SinoProbe Lab, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Hebei Hongshan Natl Observ Thick Sediments & Seism, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
model comparison; shear-wave velocity model; Southwest China; WAVE ARRAY TOMOGRAPHY; SE TIBET; LITHOSPHERIC STRUCTURE; 2-STATION ANALYSIS; CRUSTAL; DISPERSION; PLATEAU; NOISE;
D O I
10.1016/j.eqs.2023.02.006
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
\The margin of the Tibetan Plateau of Southwest China is one of the most seismically active regions of China and is the location of the China Seismic Experimental Site (CSES). Many studies have developed seismic velocity models of Southwest China, but few have compared and evaluated these models which is important for further model improvement. Thus, we compared six published seismic shear-wave velocity models of Southwest China on absolute velocity and velocity perturbation patterns. The models are derived from different types of data (e.g., surface waves from ambient noise and earthquakes, body-wave travel times, receiver functions) and inversion methods. We interpolated the models into a uniform horizontal grid (0.5 degrees x 0.5 degrees) and vertically sampled them at 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 60 km depths. We found significant differences between the six models. Then, we selected three of them that showed greater consistency for further comparison. Our further comparisons revealed systematic biases between models in absolute velocity that may be related to different data types. The perturbation pattern of the model is especially divergent in the shallow part, but more consistent in the deep part. We conducted synthetic and inversion tests to explore possible causes and our results imply that systematic differences between the data, differences in methods, and other factors may directly affect the model. Therefore, the Southwest China velocity model still has considerable room for improvement, and the impact of inconsistency between different data types on the model needs further research. Finally, we proposed a new reference shear-wave velocity model of Southwest China (SwCM-S1.0) based on the three selected models with high consistency. We believe that this model is a better representation of more robust features of the models that are based on different data sets.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 39
页数:25
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A comparative study of seismic tomography models of Southwest China
    Xuezhen Zhang
    Xiaodong Song
    Feiyi Wang
    [J]. Earthquake Science, 2023, 36 (01) : 15 - 39
  • [2] A comparative study of seismic tomography models of the Chinese continental lithosphere
    Xuezhen Zhang
    Xiaodong Song
    Jiangtao Li
    [J]. Earthquake Science, 2022, 35 (03) : 161 - 185
  • [3] A comparative study of seismic tomography models of the Chinese continental lithosphere
    Zhang, Xuezhen
    Song, Xiaodong
    Li, Jiangtao
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE SCIENCE, 2022, 35 (03) : 161 - 185
  • [4] Seismic structure of the Tengchong volcanic area southwest China from local earthquake tomography
    Xu, Yi
    Yang, Xiaotao
    Li, Zhiwei
    Liu, Jianhua
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2012, 239 : 83 - 91
  • [5] Comparative study of ethnic groups' batik patterns in Southwest China
    [J]. 1600, China Textile Engineering Society (37):
  • [6] Crustal structure of the Southwest Subbasin, South China Sea, from wide-angle seismic tomography and seismic reflection imaging
    Zhiteng Yu
    Jiabiao Li
    Weiwei Ding
    Jie Zhang
    Aiguo Ruan
    Xiongwei Niu
    [J]. Marine Geophysical Research, 2017, 38 : 85 - 104
  • [7] Crustal structure of the Southwest Subbasin, South China Sea, from wide-angle seismic tomography and seismic reflection imaging
    Yu, Zhiteng
    Li, Jiabiao
    Ding, Weiwei
    Zhang, Jie
    Ruan, Aiguo
    Niu, Xiongwei
    [J]. MARINE GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 38 (1-2) : 85 - 104
  • [8] A comparative study of two models for the seismic analysis of buildings
    Luevanos, A.
    [J]. INGENIERIA E INVESTIGACION, 2012, 32 (03): : 37 - 41
  • [9] The Crust and Upper Mantle of the East China Sea (Seismic Tomography and Gravity Models)
    A. M. Petrishchevsky
    [J]. Russian Journal of Pacific Geology, 2022, 16 : 465 - 476
  • [10] The Crust and Upper Mantle of the East China Sea (Seismic Tomography and Gravity Models)
    Petrishchevsky, A. M.
    [J]. RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF PACIFIC GEOLOGY, 2022, 16 (05) : 465 - 476