Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development

被引:2
|
作者
Singh, Hardeep [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Nelson, Michelle L. A. [4 ,5 ]
Martyniuk, Julia [6 ]
Colquhoun, Heather [1 ,3 ]
Munce, Sarah [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cameron, Jill, I [1 ,3 ]
Kokorelias, Kristina Marie [7 ]
Pakkal, Oya [4 ]
Kuluski, Kerry [5 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Temerty Fac Med, Dept Occupat Sci & Occupat Therapy, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Toronto Rehabil Inst, KITE, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Rehabil Sci Inst, Temerty Fac Med, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Res Inst, Bridgepoint Collaboratory Res & Innovat, Sinai Hlth Syst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Toronto, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, Toronto, ON, Canada
[6] Univ Toronto, Gerstein Sci Informat Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[7] Univ Hlth Network, Dept Med, Geriatr Med, Sinai Hlth Syst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[8] Trillium Hlth Partners, Inst Better Hlth, Mississauga, ON, Canada
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 11期
关键词
Stroke; STROKE MEDICINE; EDUCATION & TRAINING (see Medical Education & Training); Protocols & guidelines; CO-DESIGN; INVOLVEMENT; DISABILITY; PATIENT; PEOPLE; HEALTH; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065150
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionCodesign is an emerging research method to enhance intervention development by actively engaging non-researchers (eg, people who have had a stroke, caregivers and clinicians) in research. The involvement of non-researchers in research is becoming increasingly popular within health studies as it may produce more relevant and effective findings. The stroke population commonly exhibits challenges such as aphasia and cognitive changes that may limit their participation in codesign. However, the use of codesign within the stroke literature has not been comprehensively reviewed. This scoping review will determine: (1) what is the extent, range and nature of stroke research that has used codesign methods? (2) What codesign methods have been used to develop stroke interventions? (3) What considerations for codesigning interventions with people who have stroke are not captured in the findings?Methods and analysisThis is a protocol for a scoping review to identify the literature relating to stroke, and codesign will be conducted on OVID Medline, OVID Embase, OVID PsychINFO, EBSCO CINAHL, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, PEDro-Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Global Index Medicus. Studies of any design and publication date will be included. Title and abstract and full-text review will be conducted independently by two reviewers. Data will be extracted, collated and then summarised descriptively using quantitative (eg, numerical descriptions) and qualitative (eg, textual descriptions) methods. Numerical summaries will map the extent (eg, number of studies), range (eg, types of studies) and nature (eg, types of interventions developed) of the literature on this topic. A thematic analysis will provide insights into the codesign methods (eg, activities, non-researchers), including heterogeneity across and within studies.Ethics and disseminationThis review protocol does not require ethics approval as data has not been collected/analysed. The findings will highlight opportunities and recommendations to inform future codesign research in stroke and other populations who exhibit similar challenges/disabilities, and they will be disseminated via publications, presentations and stakeholder meetings.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] PROTOCOL: Methods used in the development, production and updating of evidence and gap maps: A scoping review
    Campbell, Fiona
    Wong, Ruth
    Llewellyen, Jennifer L.
    Stoniute, Akvile
    Pearson, Fiona
    Bond, Melissa
    CAMPBELL SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2024, 20 (02)
  • [12] Community integration among individuals with stroke: a scoping review protocol
    Tipnis, Sanjana Shirish
    Pawar, Vaishnavi Vilas
    Shinde, Rahul Arun
    Kumari, Deeksha
    Padmashali, Lavanya
    Mehrotra, Shashank
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-HEIDELBERG, 2023, 31 (06): : 993 - 997
  • [13] Community integration among individuals with stroke: a scoping review protocol
    Sanjana Shirish Tipnis
    Vaishnavi Vilas Pawar
    Rahul Arun Shinde
    Deeksha Kumari
    Lavanya Padmashali
    Shashank Mehrotra
    Journal of Public Health, 2023, 31 : 993 - 997
  • [14] Intervention and assessment of executive dysfunction in patients with stroke: A scoping review
    Sakai, Katsuya
    Hosoi, Yuichiro
    Tanabe, Junpei
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (02):
  • [15] Development and use of mobile messaging for individuals with musculoskeletal pain conditions: a scoping review protocol
    Scotti Requena, Simone
    Sterling, Michele
    Elphinston, Rachel A.
    Ritchie, Carrie
    Robins, Sarah
    Armfield, Nigel R.
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [16] Descriptive Review of Online Information Resources for People With Stroke: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Inglis-Jassiem, Gakeemah
    Grimmer, Karen
    Conradie, Thandi
    Louw, Quinette
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (07):
  • [17] Codesign and development of a primary school based pathway for child anxiety screening and intervention delivery: a protocol, mixed-methods feasibility study
    Williamson, Victoria
    Larkin, Michael
    Reardon, Tessa
    Pearcey, Samantha
    Hill, Claire
    Stallard, Paul
    Spence, Susan H.
    Breen, Maria
    Macdonald, Ian
    Ukoumunne, Obioha
    Ford, Tamsin
    Violato, Mara
    Sniehotta, Falko
    Stainer, Jason
    Gray, Alastair
    Brown, Paul
    Sancho, Michelle
    Creswell, Cathy
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (04):
  • [18] Use of the Vitiligo Extent Score: a protocol for a scoping review
    Rueda-Galvis, Paola Andrea
    Orozco-Jimenez, Sara
    Builes-Montano, Carlos E.
    Arango-Salgado, Andrea
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (02):
  • [19] Inappropriate Use of a Scoping Review or an Innovation in Methods?
    Gordon, Morris
    Daniel, Michelle
    Thammasitboon, Satid
    ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2024, 99 (07) : 707 - 707
  • [20] A scoping review of the use of creative activities in stroke rehabilitation
    Liu, Shuang
    Huang, XianYi
    Liu, Yan
    Yue, Jie
    Li, Yu
    Chen, Li
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2024, 38 (04) : 497 - 509