PROTOCOL: Methods used in the development, production and updating of evidence and gap maps: A scoping review

被引:1
|
作者
Campbell, Fiona [1 ]
Wong, Ruth [2 ]
Llewellyen, Jennifer L. [2 ]
Stoniute, Akvile [1 ]
Pearson, Fiona [1 ]
Bond, Melissa [3 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Populat Hlth Sci Inst, Newcastle NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sch Hlth & Related Res, Sheffield, England
[3] UCL, EPPI Ctr, London, England
关键词
evidence and gap maps; evidence synthesis; mapping reviews; scoping review; systematic review;
D O I
10.1002/cl2.1402
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Evidence and gap maps (EGMs) are an increasinly popular approach used in evidence synthesis. As an approach they address broad research questions, describing the existing evidence base, highlighting evidence gaps and providing an interactive visual tool for knowledge users. The purpose of this methodological study is to explore the the processes used in the development of EGM's and how they are reported. The aim is to better understand current practice and identify where clearer guidance is needed to support their production.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping Chilean clinical research: a protocol for a scoping review and multiple evidence gap maps
    Bracchiglione, Javier
    Meza, Nicolas
    Franco, Juan Victor Ariel
    Escobar Liquitay, Camila Micaela
    Munoz, Sergio R.
    Urrutia, Gerard
    Madrid, Eva
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [2] How are qualitative methods used in implementation science research? A scoping review protocol
    Hagaman, Ashley
    Rhodes, Elizabeth C.
    Nyhan, Kate
    Katague, Marina
    Schwartz, Anna
    Spiegelman, Donna
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2021, 19 (06) : 1344 - 1353
  • [3] Methods for developing quality indicators for evidence implementation: a scoping review protocol
    McArthur, Alexa
    Munn, Zachary
    Lizarondo, Lucylynn
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2023, 21 (03) : 601 - 608
  • [4] Updating the Data on Malaria Vectors in Malaysia: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Ali, Rafidah
    Ali, Wan Najdah Wan Mohamad
    Putit, Perada Wilson
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2023, 12
  • [5] Scoping review protocol of the use of codesign methods in stroke intervention development
    Singh, Hardeep
    Nelson, Michelle L. A.
    Martyniuk, Julia
    Colquhoun, Heather
    Munce, Sarah
    Cameron, Jill, I
    Kokorelias, Kristina Marie
    Pakkal, Oya
    Kuluski, Kerry
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (11):
  • [6] A scoping review of the development resilience literature: Theory, methods and evidence
    Barrett, Christopher B.
    Ghezzi-Kopel, Kate
    Hoddinott, John
    Homami, Nima
    Tennant, Elizabeth
    Upton, Joanna
    Wu, Tong
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 146
  • [7] Scoping review of review methodologies used for guiding evidence-based practice in critical care: a protocol
    Davies, Hugh
    Watkins, Paige Marie
    Freeman-Sanderson, Amy
    Nickels, Marc Richard
    Ankravs, Melissa
    Ridley, Emma J.
    Brooks, Kate
    Udy, Andrew A.
    Massey, Debbie
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (11):
  • [8] Methods Used in the Development of Common Data Models for Health Data: Scoping Review
    Ahmadi, Najia
    Zoch, Michele
    Kelbert, Patricia
    Noll, Richard
    Schaaf, Jannik
    Wolfien, Markus
    Sedlmayr, Martin
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 11
  • [9] Current pesticide suicide surveillance methods used across the African continent: a scoping review protocol
    Brassell, Maxine
    Karunarathne, Ayanthi
    Utyasheva, Leah
    Eddleston, Michael
    Konradsen, Flemming
    Rother, Hanna-Andrea
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (08):
  • [10] Nodding syndrome: bridging the gap-a scoping review protocol
    De Castro, Ana Cristina
    Ortega-Deballon, Ivan
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):