Field evaluation of the performance of engineered on-site wastewater treatment units

被引:13
|
作者
Lowe, Kathryn S.
Van Cuyk, Sheila M. [2 ]
Siegrist, Robert L.
Drewes, Joerg E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Environm Sci & Engn Div, Adv Water Technol Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Decis Applicat Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:8(735)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A conventional on-site wastewater system (OWS) is traditionally comprised of one or more septic tanks for treatment of raw wastewater followed by percolation through natural soil to achieve purification prior to groundwater recharge. Other types of engineered treatment units (e.g., sand filters, textile media filters) may be implemented where site conditions are not suitable for conventional systems or in sensitive areas, such as those with nitrogen loading concerns. The research presented here is part of a large field study conducted to evaluate the purification performance of OWS employing three different engineered treatment units: a septic tank, a septic tank with a textile filter unit (TFU), and a septic tank with a membrane bioreactor (MBR). The TFU or MBR employ treatment processes that are designed to achieve higher purification compared to a septic tank so that soil treatment can be accomplished at higher hydraulic loading rates and/or with less unsaturated soil depth. This paper describes the installation, operation, and monitoring of the effluent generated from three engineered treatment units operated for a period of 16-28 months. The three treatment units, as expected, achieved different purification efficiencies for organic matter, total suspended solids, nutrients, and bacteria with the relative removal efficiency of MBR>TFU> septic tank. The relative degree of operational complexity, operation and maintenance requirements, energy use, and cost followed the same ranking.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 743
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On-site wastewater treatment using reactive filter media
    Mazeikiene, Ausra
    Sarko, Julita
    [J]. WATER AND ENVIRONMENT JOURNAL, 2021, 35 (01) : 252 - 258
  • [42] Upflow Evapotranspiration System for the Treatment of On-Site Wastewater Effluent
    Curneen, Sean
    Gill, Laurence
    [J]. WATER, 2015, 7 (05): : 2037 - 2059
  • [43] Comparisons of Packing Materials in On-Site Wastewater Treatment System
    Chabaud, Sylvaine
    Andres, Yves
    Lakel, Abdel
    Le Cloirec, Pierre
    [J]. WATER PRACTICE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 1 (03):
  • [44] On-site carwash wastewater treatment and reuse: a systematic review
    Torkashvand, Javad
    Pasalari, Hasan
    Gholami, Mitra
    Younesi, Shahrbanou
    Oskoei, Vahide
    Farzadkia, Mahdi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2022, 102 (15) : 3613 - 3627
  • [45] New technologies for on-site domestic and agricultural wastewater treatment
    Joy, D
    Weil, C
    Crolla, A
    Bonte-Gelok, S
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2001, 28 : 115 - 123
  • [46] On-site evaluation of selenium treatment technologies
    Cherry, JC
    Saran, J
    [J]. BIOREMEDIATION OF INORGANIC COMPOUNDS, 2001, 6 (09): : 323 - 330
  • [47] Treatment efficiency of package plants for on-site wastewater treatment in cold climates
    Vidal, Brenda
    Kinnunen, Juho
    Hedstrom, Annelie
    Heiderscheidt, Elisangela
    Rossi, Pekka
    Herrmann, Inga
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2023, 342
  • [48] Evaluation of On-site Wastewater Disposal Systems in Mississippi Coastal Areas
    Ayanangshu Dey
    Dennis D. Truax
    [J]. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2012, 223 : 2145 - 2156
  • [49] Evaluation of On-site Wastewater Disposal Systems in Mississippi Coastal Areas
    Dey, Ayanangshu
    Truax, Dennis D.
    [J]. WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2012, 223 (05): : 2145 - 2156
  • [50] Performance of an on-site wastewater disposal system in a slowly permeable soil
    Weymann, DF
    Amoozegar, A
    Hoover, MT
    [J]. ON-SITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT: PROCEEDINGS OF THE EIGHTH NATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON INDIVIDUAL AND SMALL COMMUNITY SEWAGE SYSTEMS, 1998, : 134 - 145