Field evaluation of the performance of engineered on-site wastewater treatment units

被引:13
|
作者
Lowe, Kathryn S.
Van Cuyk, Sheila M. [2 ]
Siegrist, Robert L.
Drewes, Joerg E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Environm Sci & Engn Div, Adv Water Technol Ctr, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Decis Applicat Div, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2008)13:8(735)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
A conventional on-site wastewater system (OWS) is traditionally comprised of one or more septic tanks for treatment of raw wastewater followed by percolation through natural soil to achieve purification prior to groundwater recharge. Other types of engineered treatment units (e.g., sand filters, textile media filters) may be implemented where site conditions are not suitable for conventional systems or in sensitive areas, such as those with nitrogen loading concerns. The research presented here is part of a large field study conducted to evaluate the purification performance of OWS employing three different engineered treatment units: a septic tank, a septic tank with a textile filter unit (TFU), and a septic tank with a membrane bioreactor (MBR). The TFU or MBR employ treatment processes that are designed to achieve higher purification compared to a septic tank so that soil treatment can be accomplished at higher hydraulic loading rates and/or with less unsaturated soil depth. This paper describes the installation, operation, and monitoring of the effluent generated from three engineered treatment units operated for a period of 16-28 months. The three treatment units, as expected, achieved different purification efficiencies for organic matter, total suspended solids, nutrients, and bacteria with the relative removal efficiency of MBR>TFU> septic tank. The relative degree of operational complexity, operation and maintenance requirements, energy use, and cost followed the same ranking.
引用
收藏
页码:735 / 743
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Factors affecting the performance and risks to human health of on-site wastewater treatment systems
    Levett, K. J.
    Vanderzalm, J. L.
    Page, D. W.
    Dillon, P. J.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 62 (07) : 1499 - 1509
  • [32] ON-SITE WASTEWATER-TREATMENT ON PROBLEM SOILS
    HANSEL, MJ
    MACHMEIER, RE
    JOURNAL WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION, 1980, 52 (03): : 548 - 558
  • [33] USE OF PEAT FOR ON-SITE WASTEWATER-TREATMENT .1. LABORATORY EVALUATION
    ROCK, CA
    BROOKS, JL
    BRADEEN, SA
    STRUCHTEMEYER, RA
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1984, 13 (04) : 518 - 523
  • [34] Innovative conception and performance evaluation of a compact on-site treatment system
    Sousa, V. P.
    Chernicharo, C. A. L.
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2006, 54 (02) : 87 - 94
  • [35] CHLORINATE WASTEWATER ON-SITE
    BAUR, FG
    CHEMTECH, 1974, (MAY) : 263 - &
  • [36] The Life Cycle Environmental Performance of On-Site or Decentralised Wastewater Treatment Systems for Domestic Homes
    Gallagher, John
    Gill, Laurence W.
    WATER, 2021, 13 (18)
  • [37] Evaluation of an on-site pilot static granular bed reactor (SGBR) for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater
    Jaeyoung Park
    Jin Hwan Oh
    Timothy G. Ellis
    Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2012, 35 : 459 - 468
  • [38] Evaluation of an on-site pilot static granular bed reactor (SGBR) for the treatment of slaughterhouse wastewater
    Park, Jaeyoung
    Oh, Jin Hwan
    Ellis, Timothy G.
    BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2012, 35 (03) : 459 - 468
  • [39] Upflow Evapotranspiration System for the Treatment of On-Site Wastewater Effluent
    Curneen, Sean
    Gill, Laurence
    WATER, 2015, 7 (05): : 2037 - 2059
  • [40] Performance evaluation of an Integrated On-site Greywater Treatment System in a tropical region
    Patil, Y. M.
    Munavalli, G. R.
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2016, 95 : 492 - 500