Pullout characteristics of percutaneous pedicle screws with different cement augmentation methods in elderly spines: An in vitro biomechanical study

被引:25
|
作者
Charles, Y. P. [1 ,2 ]
Pelletier, H. [3 ,4 ]
Hydier, P. [3 ]
Schuller, S. [1 ,2 ]
Garnon, J. [5 ]
Sauleau, E. A. [6 ]
Steib, J. -P. [1 ,2 ]
Clavert, P. [1 ,3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Strasbourg, Grp Etud Biomecan Osteoarticulaire Strasbourg, Federat Med Translat Strasbourg, GEBOAS, F-67085 Strasbourg, France
[2] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Serv Chirurg Rachis, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[3] Univ Strasbourg, Inst Natl Sci Appl, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[4] Univ Strasbourg, UPR CNRS 22, Inst Charles Sadron, F-67000 Strasbourg, France
[5] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Serv Radiol Intervent, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[6] Hop Univ Strasbourg, Dept Sante Publ, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[7] Univ Strasbourg, Inst Anat Normale, Fac Med, F-67085 Strasbourg, France
关键词
Pullout test; Percutaneous pedicle screw augmentation; Elderly spine; Cement distribution; Rupture pattern; INITIAL FIXATION; STRENGTH; INSERTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.otsr.2015.01.005
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Vertebroplasty prefilling or fenestrated pedicle screw augmentation can be used to enhance pullout resistance in elderly patients. It is not clear which method offers the most reliable fixation strength if axial pullout and a bending moment is applied. The purpose of this study is to validate a new in vitro model aimed to reproduce a cut out mechanism of lumbar pedicle screws, to compare fixation strength in elderly spines with different cement augmentation techniques and to analyze factors that might influence the failure pattern. Materials and methods: Six human specimens (82-100 years) were instrumented percutaneously at L2, L3 and L4 by non-augmented screws, vertebroplasty augmentation and fenestrated screws. Cement distribution (2 ml PMMA) was analyzed on CT. Vertebral endplates and the rod were oriented at 45 to the horizontal plane. The vertebral body was held by resin in a cylinder, linked to an unconstrained pivot, on which traction (10 N/s) was applied until rupture. Load-displacement curves were compared to simultaneous video recordings. Results: Median pullout forces were 488.5 N (195-500) for non-augmented screws, 643.5 N (270-1050) for vertebroplasty augmentation and 943.5 N (750-1084) for fenestrated screws. Cement augmentation through fenestrated screws led to significantly higher rupture forces compared to non-augmented screws (P=0.0039). The pullout force after vertebroplasty was variable and linked to cement distribution. A cement bolus around the distal screw tip led to pullout forces similar to non-augmented screws. A proximal cement bolus, as it was observed in fenestrated screws, led to higher pullout resistance. This cement distribution led to vertebral body fractures prior to screw pullout. Conclusion: The experimental setup tended to reproduce a pullout mechanism observed on radiographs, combining axial pullout and a bending moment. Cement augmentation with fenestrated screws increased pullout resistance significantly, whereas the fixation strength with the vertebroplasty prefilling method was linked to the cement distribution. (C) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 374
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Increased stability due to symmetric cement volume in augmented pedicle screws? A biomechanical study
    Weber, Maximilian
    Lenz, Maximilian
    Egenolf, Philipp
    Prescher, Andreas
    Walter, Sebastian
    Heck, Vincent J.
    Eysel, Peer
    Scheyerer, Max Joseph
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2023, 112 (01)
  • [22] A novel calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite for the augmentation of cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screws fixation: A cadaver and biomechanical study
    Sun, Haolin
    Liu, Chun
    Li, Xuwen
    Liu, Huiling
    Zhang, Weiguang
    Yang, Huilin
    Li, Chunde
    Yang, Lei
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRANSLATION, 2020, 20 : 56 - 66
  • [23] Utility of Cement Augmentation via Percutaneous Fenestrated Pedicle Screws for Stabilization of Cancer-Related Spinal Instability
    Shin, John H.
    OPERATIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 16 (05) : 599 - 599
  • [24] Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in vitro Study
    Lorenz, Andrea
    Leichtle, Carmen I.
    Frantz, Sandra
    Bumann, Marte
    Tsiflikas, Ilias
    Shiozawa, Thomas
    Leichtle, Ulf G.
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2017, 9 (02) : 229 - 236
  • [25] Pullout strength for cannulated pedicle screws with bone cement augmentation in severely osteoporotic bone: Influences of radial hole and pilot hole tapping
    Chen, Lih-Huei
    Tai, Ching-Lung
    Lai, Po-Liang
    Lee, De-Mei
    Tsai, Tsung-Tin
    Fu, Tsai-Sheng
    Niu, Chi-Chien
    Chen, Wen-Jer
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2009, 24 (08) : 613 - 618
  • [26] Revision of Cannulated and Perforated Cement-Augmented Pedicle Screws A Biomechanical Study in Human Cadavers
    Bullmann, Viola
    Schmoelz, Werner
    Richter, Marcus
    Grathwohl, Corinna
    Schulte, Tobias L.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (19) : E932 - E939
  • [27] Effect of insertional temperature on the pullout strength of pedicle screws inserted into thoracic vertebrae -: An in vitro calf study
    Tosun, Bilgehan
    Sinmazcelik, Tamer
    Buluc, Levent
    Cuerguel, Ismail
    Sarlak, Ahmet Yilmaz
    SPINE, 2008, 33 (19) : E667 - E672
  • [28] Revision characteristics of cement-augmented, cannulated-fenestrated pedicle screws in the osteoporotic vertebral body: a biomechanical in vitro investigation Technical note
    Blattert, Thomas R.
    Glasmacher, Stefan
    Riesner, Hans-Joachim
    Josten, Christoph
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2009, 11 (01) : 23 - 27
  • [29] Biomechanical Analysis of Different Techniques in Revision Spinal Instrumentation Larger Diameter Screws Versus Cement Augmentation
    Kiner, Dirk W.
    Wybo, Christopher D.
    Sterba, William
    Yeni, Yener N.
    Bartol, Stephen W.
    Vaidya, Rahul
    SPINE, 2008, 33 (24) : 2618 - 2622
  • [30] A comparison of pullout strength for pedicle screws of different designs - A study using tapped and untapped pilot holes
    Pfeiffer, Ferris M.
    Abernathie, Dennis L.
    SPINE, 2006, 31 (23) : E867 - E870