Pull out Strength of Dual Outer Diameter Pedicle Screws Compared to Uncemented and Cemented Standard Pedicle Screws: A Biomechanical in vitro Study

被引:11
|
作者
Lorenz, Andrea [1 ]
Leichtle, Carmen I. [1 ]
Frantz, Sandra [1 ]
Bumann, Marte [1 ]
Tsiflikas, Ilias [2 ]
Shiozawa, Thomas [3 ]
Leichtle, Ulf G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Tubingen, Germany
[2] Univ Hosp Tubingen, Dept Radiol, Tubingen, Germany
[3] Univ Tubingen, Inst Anat, Dept Clin Anat & Cell Analyt, Tubingen, Germany
关键词
Cementation; Dual outer diameter screw; Osteoporosis; Pedicle screws; Pull-out strength; POLYMETHYLMETHACRYLATE AUGMENTATION; OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAE; FIXATION; BONE; DESIGN; INTERFACE; SPINES; TORQUE;
D O I
10.1111/os.12322
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To analyze the potential of the dual outer diameter screw and systematically evaluate the pull-out force of the dual outer diameter screw compared to the uncemented and cemented standard pedicle screws with special regard to the pedicle diameter and the vertebra level. Methods: Sixty vertebrae of five human spines (T-6-L-5) were sorted into three study groups for pairwise comparison of the uncemented dual outer diameter screw, the uncemented standard screw, and the cemented standard screw, and randomized with respect to bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebra level. The vertebrae were instrumented, insertion torque was determined, and pull-out testing was performed using a material testing machine. Failure load was evaluated in pairwise comparison within each study group. The screw-to-pedicle diameter ratio was determined and the uncemented dual outer diameter and standard screws were compared for different ratios as well as vertebra levels. Results: Significantly increased pull-out forces were measured for the cemented standard screw compared to the uncemented standard screw (+689 N, P < 0.001) and the dual outer diameter screw (+403 N, P < 0.001). Comparing the dual outer diameter screw to the uncemented standard screw in the total study group, a distinct but not significant increase was measured (+149 N, P = 0.114). Further analysis of these two screws, however, revealed a significant increase of pull-out force for the dual outer diameter screw in the lumbar region (+247 N, P = 0.040), as well as for a screw-to-pedicle diameter ratio between 0.6 and 1 (+488 N, P = 0.028). Conclusions: For clinical application, cement augmentation remains the gold standard for increasing screw stability. According to our results, the use of a dual outer diameter screw is an interesting option to increase screw stability in the lumbar region without cement augmentation. For the thoracic region, however, the screw-to-pedicle diameter should be checked and attention should be paid to screw cut out, if the dual outer diameter screw is considered.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 236
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Pull-out strength of cemented solid versus fenestrated pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae
    Leichtle, C. I.
    Lorenz, A.
    Rothstock, S.
    Happel, J.
    Walter, F.
    Shiozawa, T.
    Leichtle, U. G.
    BONE & JOINT RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (09): : 419 - 426
  • [2] A comparison of the biomechanical stability of pedicle-lengthening screws and traditional pedicle screws AN IN VITRO INSTANT AND FATIGUE-RESISTANT PULL-OUT TEST
    Qian, L.
    Jiang, C.
    Sun, P.
    Xu, D.
    Wang, Y.
    Fu, M.
    Zhong, S.
    Ouyang, J.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (04): : 516 - 521
  • [3] Clinical relevance of pull-out strength testing of pedicle screws
    Dawson, JM
    Boschert, P
    Macenski, MM
    Rand, N
    SPINAL IMPLANTS: ARE WE EVALUATING THEM APPROPRIATELY, 2003, 1431 : 68 - 77
  • [4] PEDICLE SCREWS - AXIAL PULL-OUT STRENGTH IN THE LUMBAR SPINE
    SELL, P
    COLLINS, M
    DOVE, J
    SPINE, 1988, 13 (09) : 1075 - 1076
  • [5] titanium expandable pedicle screw improves initial pullout strength as compared with standard pedicle screws
    Vishnubhotla, Srilakshmi
    McGarry, William B.
    Mahar, Andrew T.
    Gelb, Daniel E.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2011, 11 (08): : 777 - 781
  • [6] Pull out strength calculator for pedicle screws using a surrogate ensemble approach
    Varghese, Vicky
    Ramu, Palaniappan
    Krishnan, Venkatesh
    Kumar, Gurunathan Saravana
    COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE, 2016, 137 : 11 - 22
  • [7] Spinolaminar locking plates improve fixation strength compared to pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis
    Dimitriy G. Kondrashov
    Amit S. Piple
    Victor Ungurean
    Adam M. Schlauch
    Andrea Rowland
    Tien Tran
    Anton Denisov
    Nikita Zaborovskii
    Oluwatodimu Richard Raji
    Spine Deformity, 2023, 11 : 1335 - 1345
  • [8] Spinolaminar locking plates improve fixation strength compared to pedicle screws: a biomechanical analysis
    Kondrashov, Dimitriy G.
    Piple, Amit S.
    Ungurean Jr, Victor
    Schlauch, Adam M.
    Rowland, Andrea
    Tran, Tien
    Denisov, Anton
    Zaborovskii, Nikita
    Raji, Oluwatodimu Richard
    SPINE DEFORMITY, 2023, 11 (06) : 1335 - 1345
  • [9] Comparison of pullout strength of pedicle screws following revision using larger diameter screws
    Varghese, Vicky
    Krishnan, Venkatesh
    Kumar, Gurunathan Saravana
    MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS, 2019, 74 : 180 - 185
  • [10] Biomechanical Properties of Novel Lateral Hole Pedicle Screws and Solid Pedicle Screws: A Comparative Study in the Beagle Dogs
    Hu, Yong
    Chu, Zhen-tao
    Shen, Shu-feng
    Zhong, Jian-bin
    Zhu, Bing-ke
    Wu, Jia-da
    Yuan, Zhen-shan
    Dong, Wei-xin
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2023, 15 (01) : 328 - 336