Current and future role of genetic screening in gynecologic malignancies

被引:25
|
作者
Ring, Kari L. [1 ]
Garcia, Christine [1 ]
Thomas, Martha H. [2 ]
Modesitt, Susan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Univ Virginia Hlth Syst, Div Canc Genet, Charlottesville, VA USA
关键词
BRCA; cervical cancer; endometrial cancer; hereditary cancer; high risk; Lynch syndrome; ovarian cancer; risk reduction; screening; REDUCING SALPINGO-OOPHORECTOMY; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; FAMILIAL OVARIAN-CANCER; PEUTZ-JEGHERS SYNDROME; LI-FRAUMENI SYNDROME; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; GERMLINE MUTATIONS; LYNCH-SYNDROME; EMBRYONAL RHABDOMYOSARCOMA; PROPHYLACTIC SALPINGECTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.04.011
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The world of hereditary cancers has seen exponential growth in recent years. While hereditary breast and ovarian cancer and Lynch syndrome account for the majority of mutations encountered by gynecologists, newly identified deleterious genetic mutations continue to be unearthed with their associated risks of malignancies. However, these advances in genetic cancer predispositions then force practitioners and their patients to confront the uncertainties of these less commonly identified mutations and the fact that there is limited evidence to guide them in expected cancer risk and appropriate risk-reduction strategies. Given the speed of information, it is imperative to involve cancer genetics experts when counseling these patients. In addition, coordination of screening and care in conjunction with specialty high-risk clinics, if available, allows for patients to have centralized management for multiple cancer risks under the guidance of physicians with experience counseling these patients. The objective of this review is to present the current literature regarding genetic mutations associated with gynecologic malignancies as well to propose screening and risk-reduction options for these high-risk patients.
引用
收藏
页码:512 / 521
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Current Systemic Treatment Landscape of Advanced Gynecologic Malignancies
    Pan, Kathy
    Gong, Jun
    Huynh, Karen
    Cristea, Mihaela
    TARGETED ONCOLOGY, 2019, 14 (03) : 269 - 283
  • [22] Current Systemic Treatment Landscape of Advanced Gynecologic Malignancies
    Kathy Pan
    Jun Gong
    Karen Huynh
    Mihaela Cristea
    Targeted Oncology, 2019, 14 : 269 - 283
  • [23] CURRENT STATUS AND FUTURE-ROLE OF HEALTH SCREENING
    NORTH, AF
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1977, 70 (10) : 1232 - 1236
  • [24] Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening: Current status and future challenges
    Chen, Hsin-Fu
    Chen, Shee-Uan
    Ma, Gwo-Chin
    Hsieh, Sung-Tsang
    Tsai, Horng-Der
    Yang, Yu-Shih
    Chen, Ming
    JOURNAL OF THE FORMOSAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2018, 117 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [25] Newborn screening for genetic disorders: Current status and prospects for the future
    Ding Si
    Han Lianshu
    儿科学研究(英文), 2022, 06 (04)
  • [26] Newborn screening for genetic disorders: Current status and prospects for the future
    Ding, Si
    Han, Lianshu
    PEDIATRIC INVESTIGATION, 2022, 6 (04) : 291 - 298
  • [27] Gestational surrogacy and the role of routine embryo screening: Current challenges and future directions for preimplantation genetic testing
    Sills, E. Scott
    Anderson, Robert E.
    McCaffrey, Mary
    Li, Xiang
    Arrach, Nabil
    Wood, Samuel H.
    BIRTH DEFECTS RESEARCH PART C-EMBRYO TODAY-REVIEWS, 2016, 108 (01) : 98 - 102
  • [28] MODIFIED RECALCIFICATION TIME - A SCREENING-TEST FOR GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
    COSTA, GV
    SPILLERT, CR
    SAMA, J
    LAZARO, EJ
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 41 (02): : A363 - A363
  • [29] Screening issues in gynecologic malignancies for women with disabilities: Critical considerations
    Welner, SL
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 1998, 7 (03): : 281 - 285
  • [30] Urinary matrix metalloproteinases as a potential screening test for gynecologic malignancies
    Bazzett, LB
    Magnus, M
    Taylor, DD
    Gercel-Taylor, C
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (02) : 435 - 442