Urinary matrix metalloproteinases as a potential screening test for gynecologic malignancies

被引:10
|
作者
Bazzett, LB
Magnus, M
Taylor, DD
Gercel-Taylor, C
机构
[1] Alton Ochsner Med Fdn & Ochsner Clin, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, New Orleans, LA 70121 USA
[2] Tulane Univ, Sch Publ Hlth & Trop Med, Dept Epidemiol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Womens Hlth, Louisville, KY 40202 USA
关键词
gynecologic malignancies; urinary matrix metalloproteinases;
D O I
10.1016/S0090-8258(03)00334-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. This was a pilot study to determine the feasibility of using urinary matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) as a screening test for gynecologic malignancies. Methods. Urine samples from ovarian (n = 29), cervical (n = 31), endometrial (n = 31), and vulvar (n = 5) cancer patients and 19 controls were collected. Substrate gel electrophoresis (zymography) was used to determine the presence of MMP-2 (72 kDa), MNIP-9 (92 kDa) and two high-molecular-weight forms (130 and 220 kDa) of MMPs. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the test for each tumor type were determined. Results. No association was noted between malignancy and presence of urinary MMPs in ovarian, cervical, endometrial, or vulvar cancer patients. Sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values, and likelihood ratios were determined. Sensitivities ranged from 28.1 to 51.0% for individual MMPs, peaking at 69.8% when the presence of any of the four proteinases was considered a positive test. Specificities ranged from 42.1 to 68.4%. Conclusion. Our study suggests that the presence of MMPs in the urine of patients with a gynecologic malignancy is not an adequate screening test for disease. There was also little evidence of an association between urinary MMPs and stage or extent of disease. However, the limited number of patients in the various stages of each disease site, specifically advanced stage disease, make it difficult to state this definitively. (C) 2003 Elsevier Science (USA). All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 442
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MODIFIED RECALCIFICATION TIME - A SCREENING-TEST FOR GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
    COSTA, GV
    SPILLERT, CR
    SAMA, J
    LAZARO, EJ
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1993, 41 (02): : A363 - A363
  • [2] URINARY-DIVERSION IN GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
    JANETSCHEK, G
    MACK, D
    HETZEL, H
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 1988, 14 (05) : 371 - 376
  • [3] URINARY CONDUIT DIVERSION IN ADVANCED GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
    DELGADO, G
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1978, 6 (03) : 217 - 222
  • [4] Matrix metalloproteinases: Potential therapy to prevent the development of second malignancies after breast radiotherapy
    Artacho-Cordon, F.
    Rios-Arrabal, S.
    Lara, P. C.
    Artacho-Cordon, A.
    Calvente, I.
    Nunez, M. I.
    SURGICAL ONCOLOGY-OXFORD, 2012, 21 (03): : E143 - E151
  • [5] CYSTOSONOGRAPHY - A SCREENING METHOD FOR THE STAGING OF GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
    KOLBL, H
    BERNASCHEK, G
    TUMORDIAGNOSTIK & THERAPIE, 1987, 8 (05) : 177 - 180
  • [6] AN OVERVIEW OF SCREENING AND EARLY DETECTION OF GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
    WHITE, LN
    CANCER, 1993, 71 (04) : 1400 - 1405
  • [7] Urinary diversion after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies
    Martinez-Gomez, Carlos
    Angeles, Martina Aida
    Martinez, Alejandra
    Malavaud, Bernard
    Ferron, Gwenael
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2021, 31 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [8] URINARY GONADOTROPIN PEPTIDE (UGP) AS A MARKER OF GYNECOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES
    WALKER, R
    CREBBIN, V
    STERN, J
    SCUDDER, S
    SCHWARTZ, P
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 1994, 14 (5A) : 1703 - 1709
  • [9] Current and future role of genetic screening in gynecologic malignancies
    Ring, Kari L.
    Garcia, Christine
    Thomas, Martha H.
    Modesitt, Susan C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 217 (05) : 512 - 521
  • [10] URINARY CYTOLOGY AS A SCREENING STUDY TO DETECT URINARY MALIGNANCIES
    MOFFAT, NA
    WISCONSIN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1978, 77 (04): : S37 - S38