Euclidean Best-Worst Method and Its Application

被引:14
|
作者
Kocak, Huseyin [1 ]
Caglar, Atalay [2 ]
Oztas, Gulin Zeynep [1 ]
机构
[1] Pamukkale Univ, Dept Business Adm, Quantitat Methods Div, TR-20160 Denizli, Turkey
[2] Pamukkale Univ, Dept Econometr, Operat Res Div, TR-20160 Denizli, Turkey
关键词
Multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM); multi-attribute decision-making (MADM); pairwise comparison; best-worst method (BWM); Euclidean norm; MAPLE; ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING; SELECTION; MCDM; EXTENSION;
D O I
10.1142/S0219622018500323
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In this study, we propose Euclidean best-worst method (Euclidean BWM), which does not require any other extra calculations and analysis compared to nonlinear Chebyshev BWM. Using numerical examples, we illustrate and discuss the efficiency of the Euclidean BWM based on minimizing Euclidean norm instead of Chebyshev norm and using the consistency index matrix. Obtained results show that Euclidean BWM is an efficient tool resulting in reliable unique solutions, regardless of the number of the criteria, comparing with the linear and nonlinear model of the Chebyshev BWM. Moreover, we develop a MAPLE package "BWM" using only pairwise comparison vectors as the arguments to obtain the unique solution of a given problem by both the Euclidean BWM and linear model of Chebyshev BWM.
引用
收藏
页码:1587 / 1605
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Balancing Role of Best and Worst in Best-Worst Method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 1 - 15
  • [2] The best-worst method for the study of preferences Theory and application
    Marley, A. A. J.
    [J]. COGNITION AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGY: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, VOL 1, 2010, : 147 - 157
  • [3] Preference rationality analysis for the best-worst method and its application to quality assessment
    Lei, Qin
    Wu, Guolin
    Wu, Zhibin
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 174
  • [4] The behavioural best-worst method
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 209
  • [5] Fuzzy best-worst method and its application in initial water rights allocation
    Xu, Yejun
    Zhu, Xiaotong
    Wen, Xiaowei
    Herrera-Viedma, Enrique
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 101
  • [6] Best-worst Tradeoff method
    Liang, Fuqi
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 610 : 957 - 976
  • [7] A weighting model based on best-worst method and its application for environmental performance evaluation
    Liu, Peide
    Zhu, Baoying
    Wang, Peng
    [J]. APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 103
  • [8] Best-worst method for robot selection
    Ali, Asif
    Rashid, Tabasam
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 25 (01) : 563 - 583
  • [9] Priority ranking for the best-worst method
    Tu, Jiancheng
    Wu, Zhibin
    Pedrycz, Witold
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2023, 635 : 42 - 55
  • [10] An analytical framework for the best-worst method
    Wu, Qun
    Liu, Xinwang
    Zhou, Ligang
    Qin, Jindong
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2024, 123