Fuzzy best-worst method and its application in initial water rights allocation

被引:39
|
作者
Xu, Yejun [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Xiaotong [1 ]
Wen, Xiaowei [3 ]
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing 211100, Peoples R China
[2] Tianjing Univ, Coll Management & Econ, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[3] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Granada, Andalusian Res Inst Data Sci & Computat Intellige, Granada 18071, Spain
[5] King Abdulaziz Univ, Fac Engn, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Initial water rights allocation; Multi-criteria decision making; Fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM); Index system;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107007
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Allocating initial water rights in a river basin is not only a significant problem but also an essential research topic. It plays a crucial role in promoting the construction of a system of water rights and water-saving society as well as alleviating the contradiction between water supply and demand. Thus, the effective initial allocation of water rights has theoretical and practical significance for enhancing water rights management in China. First, this paper analyzes the impact of the strictest water resources management system on the establishment of the main criteria in the initial water rights allocation index system of a basin, including social, economic and environmental benefit criteria. Then, a new fuzzy comparison-based method, namely the fuzzy best-worst method (FBWM), is proposed to determine the weights of criteria and a procedure for group decision-making by FBWM is put forward. Finally, a case study about the initial water rights allocation in the Huaihe River Basin is illustrated to show how the developed FBWM works for real-world applications. Sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis with the existing methods are also provided to show the performance of the proposed method. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Euclidean Best-Worst Method and Its Application
    Kocak, Huseyin
    Caglar, Atalay
    Oztas, Gulin Zeynep
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & DECISION MAKING, 2018, 17 (05) : 1587 - 1605
  • [2] A Fuzzy Best-Worst Method Based on the Fuzzy Interval Scale
    Goldani, Nastaran
    Kazemi, Mostafa
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 59 - 73
  • [3] Fuzzy applications of Best-Worst method in manufacturing environment
    Sofuoglu, Mehmet Alper
    [J]. SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 24 (01) : 647 - 659
  • [4] Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Best-Worst Method
    Cheng, Xianjuan
    Chen, Changxiong
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 237
  • [5] The Balancing Role of Best and Worst in Best-Worst Method
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2021, 2022, : 1 - 15
  • [6] The best-worst method for the study of preferences Theory and application
    Marley, A. A. J.
    [J]. COGNITION AND NEUROPSYCHOLOGY: INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, VOL 1, 2010, : 147 - 157
  • [7] Comparing best-worst method and full consistency method in a fuzzy environment
    Haqbin, Arash
    [J]. DECISION SCIENCE LETTERS, 2022, 11 (02) : 181 - 192
  • [8] Preference rationality analysis for the best-worst method and its application to quality assessment
    Lei, Qin
    Wu, Guolin
    Wu, Zhibin
    [J]. COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 174
  • [9] The behavioural best-worst method
    Kheybari, Siamak
    Ishizaka, Alessio
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 209
  • [10] Best-worst Tradeoff method
    Liang, Fuqi
    Brunelli, Matteo
    Rezaei, Jafar
    [J]. INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2022, 610 : 957 - 976