Management of Low-Energy Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fractures by Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation

被引:27
|
作者
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Gu, Xiao-hua [2 ]
Li, Xi [1 ]
Wu, Jian-hong [1 ]
Ju, Yu-feng [2 ]
Huang, Wei-jie [3 ]
Wang, Qiu-gen [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Trauma Ctr, 650 Xin Songjiang Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Seventh Peoples Hosp, Trauma Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Punan Hosp, Trauma Ctr, Shanghai 200120, Peoples R China
关键词
Basicervical proximal femoral fractures; Elderly patients; PFNA-II; Tip-apex distance; INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; HIP SCREW; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1111/os.12579
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) devices and demonstrate the effectiveness of PFNA-II for the treatment of basicervical fractures in elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients treated with PFNA-II for a proximal femoral fracture between January 2013 and February 2017 at three different institutions (Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Punan Hospital and Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital) was conducted. The X-ray films were strictly reviewed by three trauma surgeons and a professional radiology doctor. Patients over 60 years of age who met the following criteria were included: (i) sustained low-energy trauma; (ii) a two-part fracture; (iii) fracture line located at the base of the femoral neck and that was medial to the intertrochanteric line and exited above the lesser trochanter but was more lateral than a classic transcervical fracture. Follow-up time should be longer than 6 months. A total of 52 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected. The average age at diagnosis was 75.1 years (range, 63-91 years); 13 patients were men and 39 were women. The same proximal femoral nail anti-rotation devices and the same surgical procedures were applied to all patients. Postoperative radiographic union time and modified Harris hip scores were used as major indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of surgery. Results: The average follow-up period was 22.5 months (18.5, 23.9, and 21.2 months, respectively) and radiographic unions were observed at an average of 19.6 weeks (range, 12-28 weeks). The patients were evaluated immediately after surgery, as well as 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Of the 49 patients, 38 had good reduction qualities (75.5%), 9 acceptable (18.3%), and 3 poor (6.1%). Radiographic union was confirmed in all fractures at an average of 19.6 weeks (range, 12-28 weeks). The mean Harris hip score was 84.9 (range, 65-99): excellent in 9 patients (18.36%), good in 30 (61.22%), medium in 8 (16.32%), and poor in 2 (4.08%). Slight persistent pain occurred in 3 patients, but these patients could still walk with the help of a cane. Two patients had symptoms of excessive telescoping. Eight patients experienced postoperative medical complications, mainly pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Conclusion: Based on the clinical and radiological outcomes, the PFNA-II devices provide strong rotational stability and excellent clinical prognosis, and are an appropriate treatment option for basicervical proximal femoral fracture in elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1179
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Imaging Evaluation of the Safe Region for Distal Locking Screw of Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation in Patients with Proximal Femoral Fracture
    Gong, Jinpeng
    Liu, Pengcheng
    Cai, Ming
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2017, 23 : 719 - 724
  • [22] Proximal Femoral Nail in Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures
    Mehboob, I
    JOURNAL OF NEPAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 48 (04) : 273 - 275
  • [23] A Retrospective Study on the Functional and Radiological Outcomes of Basicervical Femoral Neck Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail
    Gopi, Jipin
    Fijad, N. R.
    Unais, P. P.
    Jayan, Aarabhy
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2022, 16 (05) : RC01 - RC04
  • [24] Evaluate the Outcomes of Senile Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures Treated with Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation Internal Fixation to Those Treated with Prosthetic Femoral Head Replacement
    Guo, Yanlong
    Wu, Hai
    Fan, Shaoguang
    Li, Jian
    Sui, Lijuan
    Zhang, Xuetao
    ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (08) : 26 - 29
  • [25] Early Clinical Outcomes of Short versus Long Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in the Treatment of Intertrochanteric Fractures
    Loh, J. L. M.
    Huang, D. M. E.
    Lei, J.
    Yeo, W.
    Wong, M. K.
    MALAYSIAN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL, 2021, 15 (02) : 115 - 121
  • [26] The Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA) in the Treatment of Proximal Femoral Fractures
    Kristek, Dalibor
    Lovric, Ivan
    Kristek, Jozo
    Biljan, Marta
    Kristek, Gordana
    Sakic, Kata
    COLLEGIUM ANTROPOLOGICUM, 2010, 34 (03) : 937 - 940
  • [27] Comparative study of trochanteric fracture treated with the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation and the third generation of gamma nail
    Xu Yaozeng
    Geng Dechun
    Yang Huilin
    Zhu Guangming
    Wang Xianbin
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2010, 41 (12): : 1234 - 1238
  • [28] Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures: A meta-analysis
    Zhang, Cong
    Chen, Zhangxin
    Wang, Mengyuan
    Chen, Wei
    Ding, Zhenqi
    MEDICINE, 2023, 102 (06) : E32920
  • [29] Effect of knee osteoarthritis on the postoperative outcome of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly: a retrospective analysis
    Jiaxing Lv
    Xiaolong Li
    Wenkui Qiu
    Jianjun Ji
    Lichao Cao
    Lei Li
    Yihong Zhang
    Zhenyan Su
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [30] Proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) for treatment of osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures
    A. Raviraj
    Ashish Anand
    Murali Chakravarthy
    Sanjay Pai
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2012, 22 : 301 - 305