Management of Low-Energy Basicervical Proximal Femoral Fractures by Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-Rotation

被引:27
|
作者
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Gu, Xiao-hua [2 ]
Li, Xi [1 ]
Wu, Jian-hong [1 ]
Ju, Yu-feng [2 ]
Huang, Wei-jie [3 ]
Wang, Qiu-gen [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Med, Shanghai Gen Hosp, Trauma Ctr, 650 Xin Songjiang Rd, Shanghai 201620, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Seventh Peoples Hosp, Trauma Ctr, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Punan Hosp, Trauma Ctr, Shanghai 200120, Peoples R China
关键词
Basicervical proximal femoral fractures; Elderly patients; PFNA-II; Tip-apex distance; INTERTROCHANTERIC FRACTURES; HIP SCREW; FEMUR;
D O I
10.1111/os.12579
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA-II) devices and demonstrate the effectiveness of PFNA-II for the treatment of basicervical fractures in elderly patients. Methods: A retrospective review of all patients treated with PFNA-II for a proximal femoral fracture between January 2013 and February 2017 at three different institutions (Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Punan Hospital and Shanghai Seventh People's Hospital) was conducted. The X-ray films were strictly reviewed by three trauma surgeons and a professional radiology doctor. Patients over 60 years of age who met the following criteria were included: (i) sustained low-energy trauma; (ii) a two-part fracture; (iii) fracture line located at the base of the femoral neck and that was medial to the intertrochanteric line and exited above the lesser trochanter but was more lateral than a classic transcervical fracture. Follow-up time should be longer than 6 months. A total of 52 patients who met the inclusion criteria were selected. The average age at diagnosis was 75.1 years (range, 63-91 years); 13 patients were men and 39 were women. The same proximal femoral nail anti-rotation devices and the same surgical procedures were applied to all patients. Postoperative radiographic union time and modified Harris hip scores were used as major indicators for evaluating the effectiveness of surgery. Results: The average follow-up period was 22.5 months (18.5, 23.9, and 21.2 months, respectively) and radiographic unions were observed at an average of 19.6 weeks (range, 12-28 weeks). The patients were evaluated immediately after surgery, as well as 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. Of the 49 patients, 38 had good reduction qualities (75.5%), 9 acceptable (18.3%), and 3 poor (6.1%). Radiographic union was confirmed in all fractures at an average of 19.6 weeks (range, 12-28 weeks). The mean Harris hip score was 84.9 (range, 65-99): excellent in 9 patients (18.36%), good in 30 (61.22%), medium in 8 (16.32%), and poor in 2 (4.08%). Slight persistent pain occurred in 3 patients, but these patients could still walk with the help of a cane. Two patients had symptoms of excessive telescoping. Eight patients experienced postoperative medical complications, mainly pneumonia and urinary tract infection. Conclusion: Based on the clinical and radiological outcomes, the PFNA-II devices provide strong rotational stability and excellent clinical prognosis, and are an appropriate treatment option for basicervical proximal femoral fracture in elderly patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1179
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of Proximal Anti-Rotation Intramedullary Nail and Femoral Head Replacement for the Treatment of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients
    Bi, Chunqiang
    Zhao, Yan
    Ma, Zilong
    Zhang, Shuqin
    ALTERNATIVE THERAPIES IN HEALTH AND MEDICINE, 2023, 29 (05) : 268 - 273
  • [12] Comparison of postoperative pain between InterTan and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in femoral intertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study
    Li, Jing
    Wang, Sheng
    Lu, Nan
    Chen, Aimin
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 16 (08): : 3859 - 3866
  • [13] Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis
    Wei Liu
    Jie Liu
    Guangrong Ji
    Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 15
  • [14] Comparison of clinical outcomes with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation versus InterTAN nail for intertrochanteric femoral fractures: a meta-analysis
    Liu, Wei
    Liu, Jie
    Ji, Guangrong
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2020, 15 (01)
  • [15] Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients
    Pu, Jin-Song
    Liu, Lei
    Wang, Guang-Lin
    Fang, Yue
    Yang, Tian-Fu
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) : 1441 - 1444
  • [16] Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) and hemi-arthroplasty in the treatment of elderly intertrochanteric fractures
    Xie, Ye
    Dong, Qirong
    Xie, Zonggang
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA BELGICA, 2019, 85 (02): : 199 - 204
  • [17] Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS) Versus Proximal Femoral Nail Anti-rotation (PFNA) in Treating Proximal Femoral Fractures: A Prospective Randomized Study
    Zhou, Fang
    Zhang, Zhi Shan
    Yang, Huan
    Tian, Yun
    Ji, Hong Quan
    Guo, Yan
    Lv, Yang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2012, 26 (03) : 155 - 162
  • [18] Results of the proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA) in elderly Chinese patients
    Jin-Song Pu
    Lei Liu
    Guang-Lin Wang
    Yue Fang
    Tian-Fu Yang
    International Orthopaedics, 2009, 33 : 1441 - 1444
  • [19] Treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures by zoledronic acid injection combined with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation
    Li, Yong
    Zhao, Wen-Bo
    Wang, De-Li
    He, Qing
    Li, Qin
    Pei, Fu-Xing
    Liu, Lei
    CHINESE JOURNAL OF TRAUMATOLOGY, 2016, 19 (05) : 259 - 263
  • [20] Treatment of osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures by zoledronic acid injection combined with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation
    Li Yong
    Zhao Wen-Bo
    Wang De-Li
    He Qing
    Li Qin
    Pei Fu-Xing
    Liu Lei
    中华创伤杂志英文版, 2016, 19 (05) : 259 - 263