FETAX interlaboratory validation study: Phase III, part 1 testing

被引:0
|
作者
Bantle, JA
Finch, RA
Burton, DT
Fort, DJ
Dawson, DA
Linder, G
Rayburn, JR
Hull, M
KumsherKing, M
GaudetHull, AM
Turley, SD
机构
[1] USA, BIOMED RES & DEV LAB, FREDERICK, MD 21702 USA
[2] UNIV MARYLAND, WYE RES & EDUC CTR, QUEENSTOWN, MD 21658 USA
[3] STOVER BIOMETR LABS INC, STILLWATER, OK 74076 USA
[4] ASHLAND UNIV, DEPT BIOL & TOXICOL, ASHLAND, OH 44805 USA
[5] MANTECH ENVIRONM RES LAB, CORVALLIS, OR 97333 USA
[6] USA, BIOMED RES & DEV LAB, GEO CTR INC, FREDERICK, MD 21702 USA
关键词
FETAX; Xenopus; teratogen; monosodium glutamate; ascorbic acid; P-aminopropionitrile; sodium acetate; sodium arsenate; copper sulfate; interlaboratory validation; developmental toxicity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
The Frog Embryo Teratogenesis Assay-Xenopus (FETAX) is a 96-h whole embryo developmental toxicity screening assay that can be used in ecotoxicology and in detecting mammalian developmental toxicants when an in vitro metabolic activation system is employed, A standardized American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) guide for the conduct of FETAX has been published, along with a companion atlas that aids in embryo staging and identifying malformations, As part of the ASTM process, a three-phase interlaboratory validation study was undertaken to evaluate the repeatability and reliability of FETAX, Seven different participants collaborated in the study, In Phase I, FETAX proved to be more repeatable and reliable than many bioassays, However, some excessive variation was observed in a few laboratories, An initial lack of assay experience by some technicians caused variation, Phase II showed far less intra- and interlaboratory variability than Phase I, Non-teratogens showed the most consistent results, while more variability was observed for the two teratogens tested, Interlaboratory coefficient of variation values for all endpoints ranged from 7.3 to 54.7, Phase III-Part 1, using coded samples and test concentration ranges selected by each laboratory, showed results similar to Phase I, Analysis of the causes of variation suggested that some technicians judged some embryos to be malformed while others consistently judged similar embryos as normal, Concentration ranges tested by some of the laboratories varied greatly and a new protocol for selecting concentrations for initial testing was written to reduce variation from this source, Testing to date suggests that FETAX is as repeatable and reliable as other standard bioassays.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 528
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A STANDARD PROTOCOL FOR PHOTOTOXICITY TESTING - RESULTS FROM AN INTERLABORATORY STUDY
    NILSSON, R
    MAURER, T
    REDMOND, N
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1993, 28 (05) : 285 - 290
  • [22] Psychological Testing in Personnel Selection, Part III: The Resurgence of Personality Testing
    Scroggins, Wesley A.
    Thomas, Steven L.
    Morris, Jerry A.
    PUBLIC PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 38 (01) : 67 - 77
  • [23] Collaborative study to improve the quality control of trace element determinations in polymers. Part 1. Interlaboratory study
    Van Borm, W
    Lamberty, A
    Quevauviller, P
    FRESENIUS JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1999, 365 (04): : 361 - 363
  • [24] Collaborative study to improve the quality control of trace element determinations in polymers. Part 1. Interlaboratory study
    Van Borm W.
    Lamberty A.
    Quevauviller Ph.
    Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 1999, 365 (4): : 361 - 363
  • [25] The popliteal lymph node assay: results of a preliminary interlaboratory validation study
    Vial, T
    Carleer, J
    Legrain, B
    Verdier, F
    Descotes, J
    TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 122 (03) : 213 - 218
  • [26] TWO-PHASE FLOW INDUCED VIBRATIONS: METHODOLOGY VALIDATION - PART 1
    Pereboom, Hajo
    Klinkenberg, Arnout
    Belfroid, Stefan
    Orre, Steinar
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2022 41ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2022, VOL 7, 2022,
  • [27] Interlaboratory validation of the in vitro eye irritation tests for cosmetic ingredients.: (1) Overview of the validation study and Draize scores for the evaluation of the tests
    Ohno, Y
    Kaneko, T
    Inoue, T
    Morikawa, Y
    Yoshida, T
    Fujii, A
    Masuda, M
    Ohno, T
    Hayashi, M
    Momma, J
    Uchiyama, T
    Chiba, K
    Ikeda, N
    Imanishi, Y
    Itakagaki, H
    Kakishima, H
    Kasai, Y
    Kurishita, A
    Kojima, H
    Matsukawa, K
    Nakamura, T
    Ohkoshi, K
    Okumura, H
    Saijo, K
    Sakamoto, K
    Suzuki, T
    Takano, K
    Tatsumi, H
    Tani, N
    Usami, M
    Watanabe, R
    TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1999, 13 (01) : 73 - 98
  • [28] VALIDATION OF AN ANALYTICAL RESIDUE METHOD FOR ANALYSIS OF GLYPHOSATE AND METABOLITE - AN INTERLABORATORY STUDY
    COWELL, JE
    KUNSTMAN, JL
    NORD, PJ
    STEINMETZ, JR
    WILSON, GR
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1986, 34 (06) : 955 - 960
  • [29] Interlaboratory study comparing the microbiological potency of spiramycins I, II and III
    Liu, L
    Saevels, J
    Louis, P
    Nelis, H
    Rico, S
    Dierick, K
    Guyomard, S
    Roets, E
    Hoogmartens, J
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS, 1999, 20 (1-2) : 217 - 224
  • [30] Interlaboratory Validation of Toxicity Testing Using the Duckweed Lemna minor Root-Regrowth Test
    Park, Jihae
    Yoo, Eun-Jin
    Shin, Kisik
    Depuydt, Stephen
    Li, Wei
    Appenroth, Klaus-J.
    Lillicrap, Adam D.
    Xie, Li
    Lee, Hojun
    Kim, Geehyoung
    De Saeger, Jonas
    Choi, Soyeon
    Kim, Geonhee
    Brown, Murray T.
    Han, Taejun
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2022, 11 (01):