Comparative analysis of functional outcome of anatomical precontoured locking plate versus reconstruction plate in the management of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures

被引:7
|
作者
Kingsly, P. [1 ]
Sathish, M. [1 ]
Ismai, N. Deen Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Rajiv Gandhi Govt Gen Hosp, Inst Orthopaed & Traumatol, Pk Town, Madras 600003, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
anatomical precontoured plate fixation; midshaft clavicle fractures; plating of clavicle fracture; reconstruction plate fixation; OPERATIVE TREATMENT; NONUNION; FIXATION; REDUCTION; 3RD;
D O I
10.1177/2309499018820351
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: For the fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures, different plates are available, each with its specific pros and cons. The ideal plating choice remains subject to ongoing discussion. Reconstruction plates are cheap and easily bendable, but their strength and stability have been questioned. The anatomical precontoured locking plates provide better stability and strength compared with the reconstruction plate. Materials and methods: We have analyzed both prospectively and retrospectively 55 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated surgically using precontoured anatomical locking plate (24 cases) or reconstruction plate (31 cases) for patients admitted in our institute between January 2011 and December 2017. The clinical and radiological outcomes between the reconstruction plate and precontoured anatomical locking plate were compared using Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and plain radiographs, respectively. Results: The mean time to union was 16.3 weeks in the reconstruction plate group compared with 13.4 weeks in the precontoured locking plate group. The mean score in Quick DASH was 32.65 in the reconstruction group and 25.44 points in the precontoured locking plate group. We had complications such as hypertrophic scar, painful shoulder, and restricted range of motion in both the groups, whereas screw cutout and plate failure were noted only in the reconstruction plate group, which needed implant removal. The mean follow-up period was 16.44 months (14-31 months). The removal of implant was carried out in three patients in the reconstruction group. None of the group had nonunion. Conclusion: Surgical management of fresh middle third clavicle fractures with anatomical precontoured locking plate provided stable fixation, faster union, and better functional outcome compared with the reconstruction plating. Anatomical plate had the advantage of less soft tissue stripping, and there is less need for lag screw fixation of the plate for fracture stability as precontoured plate itself provides a rigid construct.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Plate Versus Intramedullary Fixation Care of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Xin-Hua
    Cheng, Lin
    Guo, Wei-Jun
    Li, A-Bing
    Cheng, Guang-Jun
    Lei, Tao
    Zhao, You-Ming
    MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (41)
  • [32] A three-dimensional reconstruction plate for displaced midshaft fractures of the clavicle
    Shen, J. -W.
    Tong, P. -J.
    Qu, H. -B.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2008, 90B (11): : 1495 - 1498
  • [33] Comparison between locked intramedullary nailing and anatomical locking plating in the treatment of displaced clavicular midshaft fractures
    Zehir, Sinan
    Calbiyik, Murat
    Sahin, Ercan
    Ipek, Deniz
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA ET TRAUMATOLOGICA TURCICA, 2016, 50 (03) : 291 - 297
  • [34] Operative Treatment of Clavicle Midshaft Fractures: Comparison between Reconstruction Plate and Reconstruction Locking Compression Plate
    Cho, Chul-Hyun
    Song, Kwang-Soon
    Min, Byung-Woo
    Bae, Ki-Cheor
    Lee, Kyung-Jae
    CLINICS IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, 2010, 2 (03) : 154 - 159
  • [35] Dual Versus Single Plate Fixation of Displaced Midshaft Clavicle Fractures
    Charles, Shaquille J. -C
    Kumar, Praveen
    Reddy, Rajiv P.
    Cong, Ting
    Chen, Stephen
    Mittwede, Peter
    Moloney, Gele
    Siska, Peter
    Lin, Albert
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 105 (23): : 1886 - 1896
  • [36] Anatomical Reduction for Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: Knowles Pinning Vs Reconstruction Plating
    Fu, Te-Hu
    Tan, Boon-Lee
    Liu, Hao-Chen
    Wang, Jun-Wen
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (01) : E23 - E30
  • [37] Plate versus titanium elastic nail in treatment of displaced midshaft clavicle fractures A comparative study
    Saha, Partha
    Datta, Prasenjit
    Ayan, Saankritya
    Garg, Anant Kumar
    Bandyopadhyay, Utpal
    Kundu, Srikanta
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 48 (06) : 587 - 593
  • [38] Sling Compared With Plate Osteosynthesis for Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Virtanen, K. J.
    Remes, V
    Pajarinen, J.
    Savolainen, V
    Bjoerkenheim, J-M
    Paavola, M.
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (11) : 961 - 961
  • [39] Sling Compared with Plate Osteosynthesis for Treatment of Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Virtanen, Kaisa J.
    Remes, Ville
    Pajarinen, Jarkko
    Savolainen, Vesa
    Bjorkenheim, Jan-Magnus
    Paavola, Mika
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2012, 94A (17): : 1546 - 1553
  • [40] Plate fixation compared with nonoperative treatment of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures: a randomized clinical trial
    Qvist, A. H.
    Vaesel, M. T.
    Jensen, C. M.
    Jensen, S. L.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (10): : 1385 - 1391