Comparative analysis of functional outcome of anatomical precontoured locking plate versus reconstruction plate in the management of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures

被引:7
|
作者
Kingsly, P. [1 ]
Sathish, M. [1 ]
Ismai, N. Deen Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Rajiv Gandhi Govt Gen Hosp, Inst Orthopaed & Traumatol, Pk Town, Madras 600003, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
anatomical precontoured plate fixation; midshaft clavicle fractures; plating of clavicle fracture; reconstruction plate fixation; OPERATIVE TREATMENT; NONUNION; FIXATION; REDUCTION; 3RD;
D O I
10.1177/2309499018820351
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: For the fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures, different plates are available, each with its specific pros and cons. The ideal plating choice remains subject to ongoing discussion. Reconstruction plates are cheap and easily bendable, but their strength and stability have been questioned. The anatomical precontoured locking plates provide better stability and strength compared with the reconstruction plate. Materials and methods: We have analyzed both prospectively and retrospectively 55 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated surgically using precontoured anatomical locking plate (24 cases) or reconstruction plate (31 cases) for patients admitted in our institute between January 2011 and December 2017. The clinical and radiological outcomes between the reconstruction plate and precontoured anatomical locking plate were compared using Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and plain radiographs, respectively. Results: The mean time to union was 16.3 weeks in the reconstruction plate group compared with 13.4 weeks in the precontoured locking plate group. The mean score in Quick DASH was 32.65 in the reconstruction group and 25.44 points in the precontoured locking plate group. We had complications such as hypertrophic scar, painful shoulder, and restricted range of motion in both the groups, whereas screw cutout and plate failure were noted only in the reconstruction plate group, which needed implant removal. The mean follow-up period was 16.44 months (14-31 months). The removal of implant was carried out in three patients in the reconstruction group. None of the group had nonunion. Conclusion: Surgical management of fresh middle third clavicle fractures with anatomical precontoured locking plate provided stable fixation, faster union, and better functional outcome compared with the reconstruction plating. Anatomical plate had the advantage of less soft tissue stripping, and there is less need for lag screw fixation of the plate for fracture stability as precontoured plate itself provides a rigid construct.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The first 100 patients treated with a new anatomical pre-contoured locking plate for clavicular midshaft fractures
    Tania Reisch
    Roland S. Camenzind
    Reto Fuhrer
    Ulf Riede
    Naeder Helmy
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 20
  • [22] Plate Fixation Versus Nonoperative Treatment for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Woltz, Sarah
    Krijnen, Pieta
    Schipper, Inger B.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2017, 99 (12): : 1051 - 1057
  • [23] Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation for the Treatment Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nasir Hussain
    Corey Sermer
    Parker J. Prusick
    Laura Banfield
    Amit Atrey
    Mohit Bhandari
    Scientific Reports, 6
  • [24] Precontoured Clavicular Locking Plate with Broad Lateral End: A Newly Designed Plate for Lateral Third Clavicle Fractures
    Kapil-Mani, K. C.
    Acharya, P.
    Arun, S.
    MALAYSIAN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL, 2018, 12 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [25] Acute clavicular midshaft fractures Plate fixation versus nonoperative treatment
    Ladislav Nagy
    Rodrigo F Pesantez
    中华创伤骨科杂志, 2008, (10)
  • [26] Kirschner Wire Temporary Intramedullary Fixation Combined with a Locking Anatomical Plate versus a Reconstruction Plate in the Treatment of Comminuted Clavicular Fractures: A Retrospective Study
    Xie, Jianxin
    Xu, Danfeng
    Zheng, Xiaofei
    Zhou, Mingdi
    Ouyang, Wei
    Zhang, Tao
    Lu, Lei
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [27] Construct failure after open reduction and plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures
    Meeuwis, M. A.
    ter Gunne, A. F. Pull
    Verhofstad, M. H. J.
    van der Heijden, F. H. W. M.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2017, 48 (03): : 715 - 719
  • [28] Robot-Assisted Retrograde Elastic Intramedullary Nailing Versus ORIF with a Plate for Displaced Midshaft Clavicular Fractures
    Zhang, Yufu
    Tan, Jie
    Zhang, Xigong
    Han, Xiao
    Li, Yanchao
    Gong, Maoqi
    Huang, Qiang
    Wang, Junqiang
    Jiang, Xieyuan
    JBJS OPEN ACCESS, 2025, 10 (01)
  • [29] FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME OF DISPLACED MIDSHAFT FRACTURE OF CLAVICLE USING LCP RECONSTRUCTION PLATE 3.5
    Singh, H. Shantikumar
    Singh, O. Guneshwar
    Maku, Nickson
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2019, 8 (17): : 1362 - 1367
  • [30] A CLINICAL STUDY OF DISPLACED CLAVICLE FRACTURES TREATED WITH ANATOMICALLY PRECONTOURED LOCKING COMPRESSION PLATE
    Mulimani, Venkatesh M.
    Ramesh, Manikya
    Babu, Chavan Pramod
    Hosthota, Akash
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2016, 5 (83): : 6218 - 6222