Comparative analysis of functional outcome of anatomical precontoured locking plate versus reconstruction plate in the management of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures

被引:7
|
作者
Kingsly, P. [1 ]
Sathish, M. [1 ]
Ismai, N. Deen Muhammad [1 ]
机构
[1] Rajiv Gandhi Govt Gen Hosp, Inst Orthopaed & Traumatol, Pk Town, Madras 600003, Tamil Nadu, India
关键词
anatomical precontoured plate fixation; midshaft clavicle fractures; plating of clavicle fracture; reconstruction plate fixation; OPERATIVE TREATMENT; NONUNION; FIXATION; REDUCTION; 3RD;
D O I
10.1177/2309499018820351
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: For the fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures, different plates are available, each with its specific pros and cons. The ideal plating choice remains subject to ongoing discussion. Reconstruction plates are cheap and easily bendable, but their strength and stability have been questioned. The anatomical precontoured locking plates provide better stability and strength compared with the reconstruction plate. Materials and methods: We have analyzed both prospectively and retrospectively 55 cases of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures treated surgically using precontoured anatomical locking plate (24 cases) or reconstruction plate (31 cases) for patients admitted in our institute between January 2011 and December 2017. The clinical and radiological outcomes between the reconstruction plate and precontoured anatomical locking plate were compared using Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and plain radiographs, respectively. Results: The mean time to union was 16.3 weeks in the reconstruction plate group compared with 13.4 weeks in the precontoured locking plate group. The mean score in Quick DASH was 32.65 in the reconstruction group and 25.44 points in the precontoured locking plate group. We had complications such as hypertrophic scar, painful shoulder, and restricted range of motion in both the groups, whereas screw cutout and plate failure were noted only in the reconstruction plate group, which needed implant removal. The mean follow-up period was 16.44 months (14-31 months). The removal of implant was carried out in three patients in the reconstruction group. None of the group had nonunion. Conclusion: Surgical management of fresh middle third clavicle fractures with anatomical precontoured locking plate provided stable fixation, faster union, and better functional outcome compared with the reconstruction plating. Anatomical plate had the advantage of less soft tissue stripping, and there is less need for lag screw fixation of the plate for fracture stability as precontoured plate itself provides a rigid construct.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clavicle nonunion and plate breakage after locking compression plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures
    Huang, Xiaoyan
    Xiao, Haijun
    Xue, Feng
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2020, 19 (01) : 308 - 312
  • [2] A Comparison of Outcome after Fixation of Unstable Lateral Third Clavicle Fractures, with Clavicular Hook Plate versus Precontoured Anatomical Plate
    Das, Milan
    Hossain, Md. Emdad
    Banerjee, Kaushik
    Shaw, Ranjit
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2020, 9 (23): : 1771 - 1774
  • [3] Middle third clavicular fractures fixed with precontoured locking compression plate or reconstruction plate: comparison of outcomes and complications
    Kariya, Ankur D.
    Jain, Pramod A.
    Patond, Kisan
    CURRENT ORTHOPAEDIC PRACTICE, 2019, 30 (03): : 257 - 262
  • [4] Precontoured Locking Plate Fixation for Displaced Lateral Clavicle Fractures
    Lee, Sang Ki
    Lee, Jae Won
    Song, Dae Geon
    Choy, Won Sik
    ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 36 (06) : 801 - 807
  • [5] A study on the outcome of displaced midshaft non-comminuted clavicle fractures treated with anatomical locking plate versus titanium elastic nail
    Abraham, Vineet Thomas
    Marimuthu, Chandrasekaran
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS TRAUMA AND REHABILITATION, 2022, 29 (02)
  • [6] Nonoperative treatment compared with plate fixation of displaced midshaft clavicular fractures
    Bernstein, Joseph
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (08): : 1866 - 1866
  • [7] Comparative study of anatomical locking plate and reconstruction plate in treating acetabular fractures
    Zhijiang Li
    Jiantao Li
    Zhirui Li
    Shaobo Nie
    Hao Zhang
    Ming Li
    Jianheng Liu
    Zhongyang Liu
    Gaoxiang Xu
    Licheng Zhang
    Peifu Tang
    International Orthopaedics, 2021, 45 : 2727 - 2734
  • [8] Comparative study of anatomical locking plate and reconstruction plate in treating acetabular fractures
    Li, Zhijiang
    Li, Jiantao
    Li, Zhirui
    Nie, Shaobo
    Zhang, Hao
    Li, Ming
    Liu, Jianheng
    Liu, Zhongyang
    Xu, Gaoxiang
    Zhang, Licheng
    Tang, Peifu
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 45 (10) : 2727 - 2734
  • [9] One year results of the first 100 patients treated with a new anatomical precontoured locking plate for clavicular fractures
    Reisch, Tania
    Fuhrer, Reto
    Helmy, Nader
    Riede, Ulf
    Camenzind, Roland
    SWISS MEDICAL WEEKLY, 2017, 147 : 28S - 28S
  • [10] Unicortical versus bicortical plate fixation for midshaft clavicular fractures
    Ernesto Zaidenberg, Ezequiel
    Andres Rossi, Luciano
    Francisco, Federico
    Tanoira, Ignacio
    Pasqualini, Ignacio
    Ranalletta, Maximiliano
    Rodolfo Zaidenberg, Carlos
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2023, 54