Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds

被引:18
|
作者
Nguyen, Tuong L. [1 ]
Aung, Ye K. [1 ]
Li, Shuai [1 ]
Nhut Ho Trinh [1 ]
Evans, Christopher F. [1 ]
Baglietto, Laura [1 ,9 ]
Krishnan, Kavitha [1 ]
Dite, Gillian S. [1 ]
Stone, Jennifer [3 ,4 ]
English, Dallas R. [1 ,2 ]
Song, Yun-Mi [5 ]
Sung, Joohon [6 ,8 ]
Jenkins, Mark A. [1 ]
Southey, Melissa C. [7 ,10 ]
Giles, Graham G. [1 ,2 ]
Hopper, John L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Epidemiol & Biostat, Level 3-207 Bouverie St, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[2] Canc Council Victoria, Canc Epidemiol & Intelligence Div, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Curtin UWA Ctr Genet Origins Hlth & Dis, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[4] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA 6009, Australia
[5] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Family Med, Irwon Ro 81, Seoul 06351, South Korea
[6] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[7] Univ Melbourne, Dept Pathol, Carlton, Vic 3053, Australia
[8] Seoul Natl Univ, Inst Hlth & Environm, 1 Gwanak Ro, Seoul 151742, South Korea
[9] Univ Pisa, Dept Clin & Expt Med, Pisa, Italy
[10] Monash Univ, Sch Clin Sci Monash Hlth, Precis Med, Clayton, Vic, Australia
来源
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH | 2018年 / 20卷
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚国家健康与医学研究理事会;
关键词
Breast cancer; Masking effect; Interval cancer; Screen-detected; Nested case-control cohort study; Australian women; Mammography; Mammographic density; TUMOR CHARACTERISTICS; RISK; ASSOCIATIONS; SIZE;
D O I
10.1186/s13058-018-1081-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundCase-control studies show that mammographic density is a better risk factor when defined at higher than conventional pixel-brightness thresholds. We asked if this applied to interval and/or screen-detected cancers.MethodWe conducted a nested case-control study within the prospective Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study including 168 women with interval and 422 with screen-detected breast cancers, and 498 and 1197 matched controls, respectively. We measured absolute and percent mammographic density using the Cumulus software at the conventional threshold (Cumulus) and two increasingly higher thresholds (Altocumulus and Cirrocumulus, respectively). Measures were transformed and adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI). Using conditional logistic regression and adjusting for BMI by age at mammogram, we estimated risk discrimination by the odds ratioper adjusted standard deviation (OPERA), calculated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and compared nested models using the likelihood ratio criterion and models with the same number of parameters using the difference in Bayesian information criterion (BIC).ResultsFor interval cancer, there was very strong evidence that the association was best predicted by Cumulus as a percentage (OPERA=2.33 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.85-2.92); all BIC >14), and the association with BMI was independent of age at mammogram. After adjusting for percent Cumulus, no other measure was associated with risk (all P>0.1). For screen-detected cancer, however, the associations were strongest for the absolute and percent Cirrocumulus measures (all BIC >6), and after adjusting for Cirrocumulus, no other measure was associated with risk (all P>0.07).ConclusionThe amount of brighter areas is the best mammogram-based measure of screen-detected breast cancer risk, while the percentage of the breast covered by white or bright areas is the best mammogram-based measure of interval breast cancer risk, irrespective of BMI. Therefore, there are different features of mammographic images that give clinically important information about different outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predicting interval and screen-detected breast cancers from mammographic density defined by different brightness thresholds
    Tuong L. Nguyen
    Ye K. Aung
    Shuai Li
    Nhut Ho Trinh
    Christopher F. Evans
    Laura Baglietto
    Kavitha Krishnan
    Gillian S. Dite
    Jennifer Stone
    Dallas R. English
    Yun-Mi Song
    Joohon Sung
    Mark A. Jenkins
    Melissa C. Southey
    Graham G. Giles
    John L. Hopper
    Breast Cancer Research, 20
  • [2] Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: Comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers
    Mandelson, MT
    Oestreicher, N
    Porter, PL
    White, D
    Finder, CA
    Taplin, SH
    White, E
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (13) : 1081 - 1087
  • [3] Mammographic breast density in relation to interval versus screen-detected cancer
    Mandelson, MT
    Oestreicher, N
    Porter, PL
    Taplin, SH
    White, E
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2000, 9 (02) : 233 - 233
  • [4] Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program
    Marisa Baré
    Núria Torà
    Dolores Salas
    Melchor Sentís
    Joana Ferrer
    Josefa Ibáñez
    Raquel Zubizarreta
    Garbiñe Sarriugarte
    Teresa Barata
    Laia Domingo
    Xavier Castells
    Maria Sala
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015, 154 : 403 - 415
  • [5] Mammographic and clinical characteristics of different phenotypes of screen-detected and interval breast cancers in a nationwide screening program
    Bare, Marisa
    Tora, Nuria
    Salas, Dolores
    Sentis, Melchor
    Ferrer, Joana
    Ibanez, Josefa
    Zubizarreta, Raquel
    Sarriugarte, Garbine
    Barata, Teresa
    Domingo, Laia
    Castells, Xavier
    Sala, Maria
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 154 (02) : 403 - 415
  • [6] Tumour characteristics of screen-detected and interval cancers in the Flemish Breast Cancer Screening Programme: A mammographic breast density study
    Timmermans, Lore
    De Brabander, Isabel
    Van Damme, Nancy
    Bleyen, Luc
    Martens, Patrick
    Van Herck, Koen
    Thierens, Hubert
    Bacher, Klaus
    Depypere, Herman
    MATURITAS, 2022, 158 : 55 - 60
  • [7] An analysis of factors associated with interval as opposed to screen-detected breast cancers, including hormone therapy and mammographic density
    Crane, CEB
    Luke, CG
    Rogers, JM
    Playford, PE
    Roder, DM
    BREAST, 2002, 11 (02): : 131 - 136
  • [8] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Tupper, Carl A.
    Maxwell, Anthony J.
    Astley, Susan
    Bydder, Megan
    Gadde, Soujanya
    Harkness, Elaine
    Lim, Yit Y.
    Wilson, Mary
    Morris, Julie
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 17
  • [9] Breast screening interval and the characteristics of screen-detected cancers
    Carl A Tupper
    Anthony J Maxwell
    Susan Astley
    Megan Bydder
    Soujanya Gadde
    Elaine Harkness
    Yit Y Lim
    Mary Wilson
    Julie Morris
    Breast Cancer Research, 17
  • [10] Biologic characteristics of interval and screen-detected breast cancers
    Gilliland, FD
    Joste, N
    Stauber, PM
    Hunt, WC
    Rosenberg, R
    Redlich, G
    Key, CR
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (09) : 743 - 749