The reliability, stability, and concurrent validity of a test of gaze stabilization

被引:30
|
作者
Ward, Bryan K. [1 ]
Mohammad, Maha T. [2 ]
Whitney, Susan L. [1 ,2 ]
Marchetti, Gregory F. [1 ,3 ]
Furman, Joseph M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Otolaryngol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Phys Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Duquesne Univ, Rangos Sch Hlth Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15219 USA
关键词
Gaze stabilization test; vestibulo-ocular reflex; aging; DYNAMIC VISUAL-ACUITY; AGE-RELATED-CHANGES; VESTIBULOOCULAR REFLEX; VESTIBULAR REHABILITATION; DYSFUNCTION; HUMANS; HYPOFUNCTION; PERFORMANCE; LOCOMOTION; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.3233/VES-2010-0371
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The gaze stabilization test (GST) is a computerized test of the vestibulo-ocular reflex that reports maximum head velocity while maintaining fixed visual acuity. The GST thus assesses the vestibulo-ocular reflex differently from the dynamic visual acuity test (DVAT). The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability, stability, and validity of the GST in a healthy young and older population. Forty subjects (20 older adults with mean (SD) age of 76.3 (5.3) and 20 young controls with mean (SD) age of 25.2 (3.2)) performed the GST and DVAT assessments. The version of the GST used in this study has a tunneled mirror system to ensure a consistent participant distance of 4 m from the computer screen. All subjects repeated trials within 30 minutes of initial testing. Twenty subjects (10 from each age group) returned 7-10 days later to repeat the GST and DVAT assessments. Vestibular symptoms were assessed before and after GST and DVAT assessments. The mean (SD) GST scores for the older group were 123 (33) deg/s in the yaw plane and 108 (27) deg/s in the pitch plane. For the young group, mean (SD) GST scores were 157 (34) deg/s in the yaw plane and 141(25) deg/s in the pitch plane. There was a significant between-group difference for GST scores in both yaw and pitch planes (p < 0.01). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for GST scores performed on the same day was 0.75 in the yaw plane and 0.69 in the pitch plane. The ICC including the 20 subjects who repeated the GST within 7-10 days was 0.59 in the yaw plane and 0.54 in the pitch plane. In general, GST was more stable than DVAT. GST was more stable in younger vs. older subjects whereas DVAT was more stable in older vs. younger subjects. Concurrent validity, determined by Spearman correlation coefficients between GST and DVAT loss results were -0.62 in the yaw plane and -0.38 in the pitch plane (p < 0.02). These results suggest that the gaze stabilization test (GST) has good same-day test-retest reliability and stability in healthy young and older adults. The moderate correlation between same-day GST and DVAT loss scores suggest the two tests may be measuring similar, but different constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:363 / 372
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Validity and reliability of the Modified Sphygmomanometer Test with fixed stabilization for clinical measurement of muscle strength
    Silva, Brenno B. C.
    Venturato, Ana C. T.
    Aguiar, Larissa T.
    Filho, Luiz F. R. M.
    Faria, Christina D. C. M.
    Polese, Janaine C.
    JOURNAL OF BODYWORK AND MOVEMENT THERAPIES, 2019, 23 (04) : 844 - 849
  • [32] Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of the 3-Meter Backward Walk Test in Stroke Survivors
    Kapan, Ali
    Ristic, Milos
    Yang, Lin
    Kranz, Gottfried
    Waldhoer, Thomas
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (23)
  • [33] Shuttle walking test in obese women: test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with peak oxygen uptake
    Juergensen, Soraia P.
    Trimer, Renata
    Dourado, Victor Z.
    Di Thommazo-Luporini, Luciana
    Bonjorno-Junior, Jose C.
    Oliveira, Claudio R.
    Arena, Ross
    Mendes, Renata G.
    Borghi-Silva, Audrey
    CLINICAL PHYSIOLOGY AND FUNCTIONAL IMAGING, 2015, 35 (02) : 120 - 126
  • [34] Test-retest reliability, concurrent validity and correlates of the two-minute walk test in outpatients with psychosis
    Vancampfort, Davy
    Kimbowa, Samuel
    Basangwa, David
    Smith, Lee
    Stubbs, Brendon
    Van Damme, Tine
    De Hert, Marc
    Mugisha, James
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2019, 282
  • [35] CONCURRENT VALIDITY OF SLOSSON INTELLIGENCE TEST
    STEWART, KD
    WOOD, DZ
    GALLMAN, WA
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1971, 27 (02) : 218 - &
  • [36] Reliability and concurrent validity of Futrex and bioelectrical impedance
    Vehrs, P
    Morrow, JR
    Butte, N
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1998, 19 (08) : 560 - 566
  • [37] Reliability and concurrent validity of the Ccomputer Workstation Checklist
    Baker, Nancy A.
    Livengood, Heather
    Jacobs, Karen
    WORK-A JOURNAL OF PREVENTION ASSESSMENT & REHABILITATION, 2013, 45 (02): : 213 - 221
  • [38] Reliability and concurrent validity of the Infant Motor Profile
    Heineman, Kirsten R.
    Middelburg, Karin J.
    Bos, Arend F.
    Eidhof, Lieke
    La Bastide-Van Gemert, Sacha
    Van den Heuvel, Edwin R.
    Hadders-Algra, Mijna
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2013, 55 (06): : 539 - 545
  • [39] THE STUDENT GOALS EXPLORATION - RELIABILITY AND CONCURRENT VALIDITY
    STARK, JS
    BENTLEY, RJ
    LOWTHER, MA
    SHAW, KM
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1991, 51 (02) : 413 - 422
  • [40] Concurrent Validity and Reliability for the Communication Complexity Scale
    Brady, Nancy C.
    Fleming, Kandace
    Romine, Rebecca Swinburne
    Holbrook, Alison
    Muller, Kristen
    Kasari, Connie
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2018, 27 (01) : 237 - 246