Reliability and concurrent validity of the Infant Motor Profile

被引:25
|
作者
Heineman, Kirsten R. [1 ,2 ]
Middelburg, Karin J. [1 ,3 ]
Bos, Arend F. [4 ]
Eidhof, Lieke [1 ]
La Bastide-Van Gemert, Sacha [5 ]
Van den Heuvel, Edwin R. [5 ]
Hadders-Algra, Mijna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Inst Dev Neurol, Dept Paediat, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Neurol, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[3] Acad Med Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Div Neonatol, Dept Paediat, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, NL-9713 GZ Groningen, Netherlands
来源
关键词
MINOR NEUROLOGICAL DYSFUNCTION; PRETERM INFANTS; CEREBRAL-PALSY; BIRTH-WEIGHT; SCALE; RISK; CHILDREN; BEHAVIOR; DEFICITS; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1111/dmcn.12100
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Aim The Infant Motor Profile (IMP) is a qualitative assessment of motor behaviour in infancy. It consists of five domains: movement variation, variability, fluency, symmetry, and performance. The aim of this study was to assess interobserver reliability and concurrent validity of the IMP with the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) and an age-specific neurological examination. Method Fifty-nine preterm infants (25 females, 34 males; median gestational age 29.7wks, median birthweight 1285g) and 146 term infants (74 females, 72 males; median gestational age 40.1wks, birthweight 3500g) were included. Assessments were performed at corrected ages of 4, 6, 10, 12, and 18months and consisted of the IMP, AIMS, and an age-specific neurological examination. Interobserver reliability was investigated on a sample of 25 video recordings. Non-parametric statistics were used to analyse the data. Results Interobserver reliability was high (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.95). At all ages, AIMS scores correlated weakly to fairly with total IMP scores (Spearman's 0.360.55), but moderately to strongly with scores on the performance domain of the IMP (Spearman's 0.470.84). A clear relation was found between total IMP score and outcome of the neurological examination (KruskalWallis p<0.001 at all ages). Interpretation Interobserver reliability of the IMP is good. Concurrent validity with the AIMS is best for the IMP performance domain. Concurrent validity with age-specific neurological examination is very good.
引用
收藏
页码:539 / 545
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concurrent validity and reliability of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in premature infants
    Almeida, Kennea Martins
    Peixoto Dutra, Maria Virginia
    de Mello, Rosane Reis
    Rodrigues Reis, Ana Beatriz
    Martins, Priscila Silveira
    [J]. JORNAL DE PEDIATRIA, 2008, 84 (05) : 442 - 448
  • [2] Concurrent and predictive validity of the infant motor profile in infants at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders
    Riccardo Rizzi
    Valentina Menici
    Maria Luce Cioni
    Alessandra Cecchi
    Veronica Barzacchi
    Elena Beani
    Matteo Giampietri
    Giovanni Cioni
    Giuseppina Sgandurra
    [J]. BMC Pediatrics, 21
  • [3] Concurrent and predictive validity of the infant motor profile in infants at risk of neurodevelopmental disorders
    Rizzi, Riccardo
    Menici, Valentina
    Cioni, Maria Luce
    Cecchi, Alessandra
    Barzacchi, Veronica
    Beani, Elena
    Giampietri, Matteo
    Cioni, Giovanni
    Sgandurra, Giuseppina
    [J]. BMC PEDIATRICS, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [4] The reliability and validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale in Japan
    Uesugi, Masayuki
    Tokuhisa, Kentaro
    Shimada, Tomoaki
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY SCIENCE, 2008, 20 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [5] The Validity and Reliability of the Arabic Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile
    Abu-Dahab, Sana M. N.
    Malkawi, Somaya Hussain
    Nadar, Mohammad Shaban
    Al Momani, Fidaa
    Holm, Margo B.
    [J]. PHYSICAL & OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY IN PEDIATRICS, 2014, 34 (03) : 300 - 312
  • [6] Brief assessment of motor function - Reliability and concurrent validity of the Gross Motor Scale
    Cintas, HL
    Siegel, KL
    Furst, GP
    Gerber, LH
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2003, 82 (01) : 33 - 41
  • [7] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Infant/Toddler Sensory Profile
    Yang, Chien-Ying
    Tseng, Mei-Hui
    Cermak, Sharon A.
    Lu, Lu
    Shieh, Jeng-Yi
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY, 2020, 74 (02):
  • [8] Reliability and Concurrent Validity of a Chinese Version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale Administered to High-Risk Infants in China
    Wang, Hui
    Lie, Haifeng
    Wang, Jiangping
    Jin, Huiying
    [J]. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 2018
  • [9] The Head Control Scale: Responsiveness and Concurrent Validity With the Alberta Infant Motor Scale
    Thomas, Jodi
    Rosen, Elaine
    Dumas, Helene
    [J]. PEDIATRIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2023, 35 (04) : 479 - 484
  • [10] The Spanish version of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale: Validity and reliability analysis
    Morales-Monforte, Erica
    Bagur-Calafat, Caridad
    Suc-Lerin, Neus
    Fornaguera-Marti, Montserrat
    Cazorla-Sanchez, Engracia
    Girabent-Farres, Montserrat
    [J]. DEVELOPMENTAL NEUROREHABILITATION, 2017, 20 (02) : 76 - 82