Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task

被引:110
|
作者
Gonthier, Corentin [1 ]
Braver, Todd S. [2 ]
Bugg, Julie M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Savoie Mt Blanc, LPNC UMR CNRS 5105, Chambery, France
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Campus Box 1125,1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
Cognitive control; Dual Mechanisms of Control (DMC); Stroop interference; List-wide proportion congruency; Item-specific proportion congruency; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; PROPORTION CONGRUENT; INTERFERENCE; EXPECTATIONS; MECHANISMS; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-016-0591-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Dual Mechanisms of Control framework posits the existence of two distinct control mechanisms, proactive and reactive, which may operate independently. However, this independence has been difficult to study with most experimental paradigms. The Stroop task may provide a useful way of assessing the independence of control mechanisms because the task elicits two types of proportion congruency effects, list-wide and item-specific, thought to reflect proactive and reactive control respectively. The present research tested whether these two proportion congruency effects can be used to dissociate proactive and reactive control. In 2 separate participant samples, we demonstrate that list-wide and item-specific proportion congruency effects are stable, exist in the same participants, and appear in different task conditions. Moreover, we identify two distinct behavioral signatures, the congruency cost and the transfer cost, which doubly dissociate the two effects. Together, the results are consistent with the view that proactive and reactive control reflect independent mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 788
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Proactive Control instead of reactive Therapy
    不详
    ALLERGO JOURNAL, 2010, 19 (04) : 278 - 278
  • [32] Proactive and reactive inhibitory control in rats
    Mayse, Jeffrey D.
    Nelson, Geoffrey M.
    Park, Pul
    Gallagher, Michela
    Lin, Shih-Chieh
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 8
  • [33] Developing adaptive control: Age-related differences in task choices and awareness of proactive and reactive control demands
    J. C. Niebaum
    N. Chevalier
    R. M. Guild
    Y. Munakata
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2021, 21 : 561 - 572
  • [34] Developing adaptive control: Age-related differences in task choices and awareness of proactive and reactive control demands
    Niebaum, J. C.
    Chevalier, N.
    Guild, R. M.
    Munakata, Y.
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 21 (03) : 561 - 572
  • [35] Cognitive control and schizophrenia: The greatest reliability of the Stroop task
    Laurenson, Charlotte
    Gorwood, Philip
    Orsat, Manuel
    Lhuillier, Jean-Paul
    Le Gall, Didier
    Richard-Devantoy, Stephane
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2015, 227 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [36] Alertness and cognitive control: Interactions in the spatial Stroop task
    Schneider, Darryl W.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2020, 82 (05) : 2257 - 2270
  • [37] Hypnotic control of attention in the Stroop task: A historical footnote
    MacLeod, CM
    Sheehan, PW
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2003, 12 (03) : 347 - 353
  • [38] Examining Bilingual Language Control Using the Stroop Task
    Sabourin, Laura
    Santa Vinerte
    JOVE-JOURNAL OF VISUALIZED EXPERIMENTS, 2020, (156):
  • [39] Anxiety, Emotional Distraction, and Attentional Control in the Stroop Task
    Kalanthroff, Eyal
    Henik, Avishai
    Derakshan, Nazanin
    Usher, Marius
    EMOTION, 2016, 16 (03) : 293 - 300
  • [40] Alcohol and the Stroop task: Examining the role of cognitive control
    Curtin, JJ
    Fairchild, BA
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 39 : S29 - S29