Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task

被引:110
|
作者
Gonthier, Corentin [1 ]
Braver, Todd S. [2 ]
Bugg, Julie M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Savoie Mt Blanc, LPNC UMR CNRS 5105, Chambery, France
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Campus Box 1125,1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
Cognitive control; Dual Mechanisms of Control (DMC); Stroop interference; List-wide proportion congruency; Item-specific proportion congruency; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; PROPORTION CONGRUENT; INTERFERENCE; EXPECTATIONS; MECHANISMS; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-016-0591-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Dual Mechanisms of Control framework posits the existence of two distinct control mechanisms, proactive and reactive, which may operate independently. However, this independence has been difficult to study with most experimental paradigms. The Stroop task may provide a useful way of assessing the independence of control mechanisms because the task elicits two types of proportion congruency effects, list-wide and item-specific, thought to reflect proactive and reactive control respectively. The present research tested whether these two proportion congruency effects can be used to dissociate proactive and reactive control. In 2 separate participant samples, we demonstrate that list-wide and item-specific proportion congruency effects are stable, exist in the same participants, and appear in different task conditions. Moreover, we identify two distinct behavioral signatures, the congruency cost and the transfer cost, which doubly dissociate the two effects. Together, the results are consistent with the view that proactive and reactive control reflect independent mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 788
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task
    Gal Dadon
    Avishai Henik
    Memory & Cognition, 2017, 45 : 891 - 902
  • [22] Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task
    Julie M. Bugg
    Larry L. Jacoby
    Jeffrey P. Toth
    Memory & Cognition, 2008, 36 : 1484 - 1494
  • [23] Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task
    Bugg, Julie M.
    Jacoby, Larry L.
    Toth, Jeffrey P.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2008, 36 (08) : 1484 - 1494
  • [24] Adjustment of control in the numerical Stroop task
    Dadon, Gal
    Henik, Avishai
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2017, 45 (06) : 891 - 902
  • [25] Electrophysiological evidence for the involvement of proactive and reactive control in a rewarded stop-signal task
    Schevernels, Hanne
    Bombeke, Klaas
    Van der Borght, Liesbet
    Hopf, Jens-Max
    Krebs, Ruth M.
    Boehler, C. Nicolas
    NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 121 : 115 - 125
  • [26] Learning to Overexert Cognitive Control in a Stroop Task
    Bustamante, Laura
    Lieder, Falk
    Musslick, Sebastian
    Shenhav, Amitai
    Cohen, Jonathan
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 21 (03) : 453 - 471
  • [27] Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task
    Nash Unsworth
    Ashley L. Miller
    Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 2023, 85 : 2277 - 2295
  • [28] Pupillary correlates of preparatory control in the Stroop task
    Unsworth, Nash
    Miller, Ashley L. L.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2023, 85 (07) : 2277 - 2295
  • [29] Learning to Overexert Cognitive Control in a Stroop Task
    Laura Bustamante
    Falk Lieder
    Sebastian Musslick
    Amitai Shenhav
    Jonathan Cohen
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2021, 21 : 453 - 471
  • [30] INVESTIGATING NEURAL MECHANISMS OF PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE CONTROL IN PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS WITH THE DOT PATTERN EXPECTANCY TASK
    Ma, Yizhou
    Kwashie, Anita
    MacDonald, Angus, III
    Sponheim, Scott
    SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 2019, 45 : S231 - S232