Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task

被引:110
|
作者
Gonthier, Corentin [1 ]
Braver, Todd S. [2 ]
Bugg, Julie M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Savoie Mt Blanc, LPNC UMR CNRS 5105, Chambery, France
[2] Washington Univ, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Campus Box 1125,1 Brookings Dr, St Louis, MO 63130 USA
关键词
Cognitive control; Dual Mechanisms of Control (DMC); Stroop interference; List-wide proportion congruency; Item-specific proportion congruency; WORKING-MEMORY CAPACITY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; PROPORTION CONGRUENT; INTERFERENCE; EXPECTATIONS; MECHANISMS; ATTENTION;
D O I
10.3758/s13421-016-0591-1
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Dual Mechanisms of Control framework posits the existence of two distinct control mechanisms, proactive and reactive, which may operate independently. However, this independence has been difficult to study with most experimental paradigms. The Stroop task may provide a useful way of assessing the independence of control mechanisms because the task elicits two types of proportion congruency effects, list-wide and item-specific, thought to reflect proactive and reactive control respectively. The present research tested whether these two proportion congruency effects can be used to dissociate proactive and reactive control. In 2 separate participant samples, we demonstrate that list-wide and item-specific proportion congruency effects are stable, exist in the same participants, and appear in different task conditions. Moreover, we identify two distinct behavioral signatures, the congruency cost and the transfer cost, which doubly dissociate the two effects. Together, the results are consistent with the view that proactive and reactive control reflect independent mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页码:778 / 788
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dissociating proactive and reactive control in the Stroop task
    Corentin Gonthier
    Todd S. Braver
    Julie M. Bugg
    Memory & Cognition, 2016, 44 : 778 - 788
  • [2] Dissociating Proactive and Reactive Control in Older Adults
    Ball, B. Hunter
    Peper, Phil
    Bugg, Julie M.
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2023, 38 (04) : 323 - 332
  • [3] Task Conflict and Proactive Control: A Computational Theory of the Stroop Task
    Kalanthroff, Eyal
    Davelaar, Eddy J.
    Henik, Avishai
    Goldfarb, Liat
    Usher, Marius
    PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2018, 125 (01) : 59 - 82
  • [4] A spatial version of the Stroop task for examining proactive and reactive control independently from non-conflict processes
    Spinelli, Giacomo
    Lupker, Stephen J.
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2024, 86 (04) : 1259 - 1286
  • [5] DISSOCIATING PROACTIVE AND REACTIVE CONFLICT IN THE SUBTHALAMIC NUCLEUS
    Sanguinetti, Joseph L.
    Cavanagh, James F.
    Allen, John J. B.
    Sherman, Scott J.
    PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2011, 48 : S72 - S72
  • [6] Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load
    Kalanthroff, Eyal
    Avnit, Amir
    Henik, Avishai
    Davelaar, Eddy J.
    Usher, Marius
    PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2015, 22 (03) : 869 - 875
  • [7] Reactive and proactive control processes in voluntary task choice
    Victor Mittelstädt
    Ian G. Mackenzie
    David A. Braun
    Catherine M. Arrington
    Memory & Cognition, 2024, 52 (2) : 417 - 429
  • [8] Stroop proactive control and task conflict are modulated by concurrent working memory load
    Eyal Kalanthroff
    Amir Avnit
    Avishai Henik
    Eddy J. Davelaar
    Marius Usher
    Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2015, 22 : 869 - 875
  • [9] Reactive and proactive control processes in voluntary task choice
    Mittelstaedt, Victor
    Mackenzie, Ian G.
    Braun, David A.
    Arrington, Catherine M.
    MEMORY & COGNITION, 2024, 52 (02) : 417 - 429
  • [10] Stroop task performance across the lifespan: High cognitive reserve in older age is associated with enhanced proactive and reactive interference control
    Gajewski, Patrick D.
    Falkenstein, Michael
    Thoenes, Sven
    Wascher, Edmund
    NEUROIMAGE, 2020, 207