Intrinsic mechanical properties of trabecular calcaneus determined by finite-element models using 3D synchrotron microtomography

被引:14
|
作者
Follet, H.
Peyrin, F.
Vidal-Salle, E.
Bonnassie, A.
Rumelhart, C.
Meunier, P. J.
机构
[1] INSA, CNRS, UMR 5514, LaMCoS, Lyon, France
[2] INSA, CNRS, UMR 5515, CREATIS, Lyon, France
[3] INSERM, U403, Lab Histodynam Osseuse, F-69008 Lyon, France
关键词
microcomputed tomography (mu CT); finite-element models; biomechanical strength; trabecular bone; calcaneus;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.10.032
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
To determine intrinsic mechanical properties (elastic and failure) of trabecular calcaneus bone, chosen as a good predictor of hip fracture, we looked for the influence of image's size on a numerical simulation. One cubic sample of cancellous bone (9 x 9 x 9 mm(3)) was removed from the body of the calcaneus (6 females, 6 males, 79 +/- 9yr). These samples were tested under compressive loading. Before compressive testing, these samples were imaged at 10.13 mu m resolution using a 3D microcomputed tomography (mu CT) (ESRF, France). The mu CT images were converted to finite-element models. Depending on the bone density values (BV/TV), we compared two different finite element models: a linear hexahedral and a linear beam finite element models. Apparent experimental Young's modulus (E-app(exp)) and maximum apparent experimental compressive stress (sigma(exp)(max)) were significantly correlated with bone density obtained by Archimedes's test (E-app(exp) = 236 +/- 231 MPa [19-742 MPa], sigma(exp)(max) = 2.61 +/- 1.97 MPa [0.28-5.81 MPa], r > 0.80, p < 0.001). Under threshold at 40 pm, the size of the numerical samples (5.18 3 and 6.6 83 MM3) seems to be an important parameter on the accuracy of the results. The numerical trabecular Young's modulus was widely higher (E-trabecular(num) = 34,182 +/- 22,830 MPa [9700-87,211 MPa]) for the larger numerical samples and high BV/TV than those found classically by other techniques (4700-15,000 MPa). For rod-like bone samples (BV/TV < 12%, n = 7), Young's modulus, using linear beam element (E-trabecular(num-skeleton): 10,305 +/- 5500 Mpa) were closer to the youns's modulus found by other techniques. Those results show the limitation of hexahedral finite elements at 40 mu n, mostly used, for thin trabecular structures. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2174 / 2183
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] 3D finite-element simulation of material flow
    Biba, Nikolai
    Stebounov, Sergei
    Metallurgia, 2002, 69 (02):
  • [22] PARALLEL FINITE-ELEMENT COMPUTATION OF 3D FLOWS
    TEZDUYAR, T
    ALIABADI, S
    BEHR, M
    JOHNSON, A
    MITTAL, S
    COMPUTER, 1993, 26 (10) : 27 - 36
  • [23] 3D magnetotelluric modeling using the T-Ω finite-element method
    Mitsuhata, Y
    Uchida, T
    GEOPHYSICS, 2004, 69 (01) : 108 - 119
  • [24] 3D DCIP Inversion Using the Finite-element Approach with Variable Elements
    Liu, Haifei
    Guo, Zhenwei
    Liu, Jianxin
    Guo, Rongwen
    Ma, Changying
    NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS AND GEOHAZARDS, 2014, : 697 - 706
  • [25] END WINDING REACTANCE COMPUTATION USING A 3D FINITE-ELEMENT PROGRAM
    BRAHIMI, AT
    FOGGIA, A
    MEUNIER, G
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1993, 29 (02) : 1411 - 1414
  • [26] IDENTIFICATION OF THE BOUNDARY SURFACES IN 3D FINITE-ELEMENT CODES
    SZCZYGIEL, I
    SZLEK, A
    BIALECKI, R
    NOWAK, AJ
    ADVANCES IN ENGINEERING SOFTWARE, 1992, 14 (01) : 33 - 39
  • [27] 3D finite-element modelling of splitting crack propagation
    Lura, P
    Plizzari, GA
    Riva, P
    MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2002, 54 (06) : 481 - 493
  • [28] 3D finite-element modeling of topological photonics in germanium
    Colombo, Ian
    Pedrini, Jacopo
    Iemmolo, Eliseo
    Pezzoli, Fabio
    MATERIALS SCIENCE IN SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING, 2024, 180
  • [29] FINITE-ELEMENT EVALUATION OF J-PARAMETERS IN 3D
    DODDS, RH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FRACTURE, 1987, 33 (01) : R7 - R15
  • [30] 3D INDUSTRIAL FLOWS CALCULATIONS BY FINITE-ELEMENT METHOD
    GREGOIRE, JP
    BENQUE, JP
    LASBLEIZ, P
    GOUSSEBAILE, J
    LECTURE NOTES IN PHYSICS, 1985, 218 : 245 - 249