The accuracy of blood pressure measured by arterial line and non-invasive cuff in critically ill children

被引:30
|
作者
Joffe, Rachel [1 ]
Duff, Jonathan [2 ]
Guerra, Gonzalo Garcia [2 ]
Pugh, Jodie [2 ]
Joffe, Ari R. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Sci, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Dept Pediat, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] 4-546 Edmonton Clin Hlth Acad,11405 87 Ave, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2016年 / 20卷
关键词
Arterial line; Blood pressure; Children; Intensive care units; Pediatric; Monitoring; Physiologic; NEWBORNS; MONITOR;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-016-1354-x
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: The accuracy of arterial lines (AL) using the flush test or stopcock test has not been described in children, nor has the difference between invasive arterial blood pressure (IABP) versus non-invasive cuff (NIBP) blood pressure. Methods: After ethics approval and consent, we performed the flush test and stopcock test on AL (to determine over damping, under damping, and optimal damping), and determined the difference (NIBP-IABP) in systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure (Delta SBP, Delta DBP, and Delta MAP). The primary outcome was incidence (95 % CI) of optimally damped AL. Predictors of Delta BP (effect size (95 % CI)) were determined using multiple linear regression. Results: There were 147 AL tests in 100 enrolled patients with mean age 44.7 (SD 56) months, weight 16.8 (SD 18. 3) kg, male 59 %, postoperative-cardiovascular 52 %, peripheral-AL 78 %, inotropes 29 %, vasodilators 15 %, and ventilated 73 %. The flush test performed in 66 patients (45 %) showed optimal damping in 30 (46 %; 95 % CI 34, 57 %), over damping in 25 (38 %) and under damping in 11 patients (17 %). The stopcock test was over-damped in 128/146 patients (88 %), with the same damping as the flush test in 24/64 (38 %). In optimally damped (flush test) AL, Delta SBP, Delta DBP, and Delta MAP were 0.8 (SD 12.2), -5.2 (SD 8.7), and -4.9 (7.6) respectively. A second set of AL tests was done 2 h later on the same day in 62 patients; AL damping often changed (10/28 flush tests) and Delta BPs correlated poorly (r = 0.31-0.55). Predictors (effect size) of Delta DBP were vasodilator infusion (15.6 (2.9 to 28.3); p = 0.016) and optimal damping (-7.2 (-12.2 to 2.2); p = 0.005); and of Delta MAP were vasodilator infusion (10.0 (-0.3 to 20.4); p = 0.057) and optimal damping (-4.0 (-8 to 0.1); p = 0.058). There were no independent predictors of damping category (n = 66 flush tests). Conclusions: Optimally damped AL occur in half of critically ill children, and this is not predictable. There is much variability in Delta BP between NIBP and the gold standard IABP, and this varies even in the same patient on the same day, and is not easily predictable. In critically ill children, NIBP may not be accurate enough to guide management, and more attention to ensuring the AL is optimally damped is needed.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] NEXFIN CONTINUOUS NON-INVASIVE ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE VALIDATED WITH INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE
    Martina, J. R.
    Westerhof, B. E.
    van Goudoever, J.
    de Beaumont, E. M.
    Hollmann, M. W.
    Lahpor, J. R.
    de Mol, B. A.
    van Lieshout, J. J.
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2009, 27 : S192 - S192
  • [23] Techniques for Non-Invasive Monitoring of Arterial Blood Pressure
    Meidert, Agnes S.
    Saugel, Bernd
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2018, 4
  • [24] NON-INVASIVE CONTINUOUS DETERMINATION OF MEAN ARTERIAL BLOOD PRESSURE USING THE T-LINE TL-200PRO DEVICE IN CRITICALLY ILL MEDICAL PATIENTS
    Saugel, B.
    Meidert, A. S.
    Hapfelmeier, A.
    Schmid, R. M.
    Huber, W.
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 38 : S271 - S271
  • [25] Comparison of invasive blood pressure monitoring vs. non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in critically ill children receiving vasoactive agents-a prospective observational study
    Shah, Sachin
    Kaul, Amita
    Nagarkar, Rohini
    Thorat, Amol
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2024, 12
  • [26] Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?
    Ali Araghi
    Joseph J Bander
    Jorge A Guzman
    Critical Care, 10
  • [27] Arterial blood pressure monitoring in overweight critically ill patients: invasive or noninvasive?
    Araghi, Ali
    Bander, Joseph J.
    Guzman, Jorge A.
    CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (02):
  • [28] THE MEAN PREHOSPITAL MACHINE; ACCURATE PREHOSPITAL NON-INVASIVE BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN THE CRITICALLY ILL PATIENT
    Muecke, Sandy
    Bersten, Andrew
    Plummer, John
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING, 2010, 24 (03) : 191 - 202
  • [29] Continuous non-invasive blood pressure measurement for the critically ill patient- is it on its way yet?
    Martin, K.
    Gertler, R.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2013, 79 (03) : 221 - 222
  • [30] Validation study of Nexfin® continuous non-invasive blood pressure monitoring in critically ill adult patients
    Ameloot, K.
    Van de Vijver, K.
    Van Regenmortel, N.
    De Laet, I.
    Schoonheydt, K.
    Dits, H.
    Broch, O.
    Bein, B.
    Malbrain, M. L. N. G.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2014, 80 (12) : 1294 - 1301