Optimized Density-Weighted Imaging for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D-MR Mammography

被引:0
|
作者
Gutberlet, Marcel [1 ,2 ]
Roth, Anne [1 ]
Hahn, Dietbert [1 ]
Koestler, Herbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Med Sch, Inst Radiol, D-30165 Hannover, Germany
[2] Univ Wurzburg, Inst Rontgendiagnost, Wurzburg, Germany
关键词
density weighting; spatial response function; signal-to-noise ratio; phase-constrained; 3D imaging; MR mammography; HUMAN HEART; SENSITIVITY; RECONSTRUCTION; ACQUISITION; RESOLUTION; GRAPPA; MRI; SENSE; WATER;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.22443
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To increase the spatial coverage and to reduce slice crosstalk combined with an optimal signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) magnetic resonance (MR) mammography. Materials and Methods: Asymmetric sampling schemes and a new reconstruction strategy based on virtual coils are presented for density-weighted (DW) 3D imaging. Additionally, for MR mammography an alternating DW (ADW) sampling along the k(y) direction shifts the under-sampling artifacts out of the signal reception region. Virtual coils for effective DW (VIDED) imaging suppresses the abasing in undersampled DW imaging. VIDED and ADW were compared to the conventional Cartesian imaging in phantom and in vivo MR mammography studies. Results: The slice crosstalk was significantly reduced by VIDED and compared to Cartesian imaging the SNR increased by 16%. Additionally, VIDED and ADW provided a substantially increased field of view (FOV) in the slice direction and allowed the spatial resolution to be improved (up to 60% for ADW and 30% for VIDED) without lengthening the scan time. Conclusion: VIDED and ADW improve the image quality in 3D DCE MR mammography by enhancing the spatial resolution, reducing the slice crosstalk at nearly optimal SNR, and increasing the FOV in the slice direction. For VIDED no lengthening of the scan time or usage of multi-channel receiver coils is necessary. Key Words: density weighting; spatial response function; signal-to-noise ratio; phase-constrained; 3D imaging; MR mammography
引用
收藏
页码:328 / 339
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 3D-MR Ductography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Mammography in Patients with Suspicious Nipple Discharge; a Feasibility Study
    Nicholson, Brandi T.
    Harvey, Jennifer A.
    Patrie, James T.
    Mugler, John P., III
    BREAST JOURNAL, 2015, 21 (04): : 352 - 362
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced thoracic 3D-MR angiography in infants and children
    Holmqvist, C
    Larsson, EM
    Ståhlbeg, F
    Laurin, S
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2001, 42 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [3] Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging
    Lewin, John
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 26 (02) : 259 - +
  • [4] Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus MR Imaging of the Breast
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Longo, Valentina
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (04) : 643 - 659
  • [5] The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography
    Brinck, U
    Fischer, U
    Korabiowska, M
    Jutrowski, M
    Schauer, A
    Grabbe, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (05) : 1331 - 1334
  • [6] Spiral imaging for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Poonawalla, AH
    Stafford, RJ
    Glover, GH
    Hazle, JD
    RADIOLOGY, 1999, 213P : 196 - 196
  • [7] Dual dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging
    Miyati, T
    Banno, T
    Mase, M
    Kasai, H
    Shundo, H
    Imazawa, M
    Ohba, S
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (01) : 230 - 235
  • [8] Reproducibility of Dynamic Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
    Thomassin-Naggara, Isabelle
    Cuenod, Charles-Andre
    Balvay, Daniel
    RADIOLOGY, 2013, 269 (02) : 619 - 621
  • [9] Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in cancer
    O'Connor, James P. B.
    Watson, Yvonne
    Jackson, Alan
    RADIOGRAPHY, 2007, 13 : E45 - E53
  • [10] Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging
    Moon, Marianne
    Cornfeld, Daniel
    Weinreb, Jeffrey
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2009, 17 (02) : 351 - +