3D-MR Ductography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Mammography in Patients with Suspicious Nipple Discharge; a Feasibility Study

被引:16
|
作者
Nicholson, Brandi T. [1 ]
Harvey, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Patrie, James T. [2 ]
Mugler, John P., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Radiol & Med Imaging, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
来源
BREAST JOURNAL | 2015年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
breast magnetic resonance imaging; galactography; indirect magnetic resonance ductography; nipple discharge; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE MAMMOGRAPHY; INTRADUCTAL PAPILLOMA; BREAST-CANCER; GALACTOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; LESIONS; BIOPSY; DUCT; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1111/tbj.12417
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We evaluated contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (ce-MR) imaging and an indirect MR galactogram (MRG) sequence against conventional galactography (CG) in women with suspicious nipple discharge who underwent histologic diagnosis. This study was Institutional Review Board approved and HIPAA compliant. Women with suspicious nipple discharge recommended for CG were recruited for our study. Patients underwent both a ce-MR as well as MRG (MRG-1 and MRG-2, variations in isotropic spatial resolution) followed by CG within 60days. The ce-MR and MRG studies were interpreted together by a single radiologist separately from CG. Pathology was used as our gold standard and was obtained via image-guided core needle biopsy or surgery with papilloma, atypia, and malignancy considered positive. Of the 21 patients recruited for the study, 20 patients had known histology results for 26 lesions; 18 patients (90.0%) had successful CG, 20 (100.0%) ce-MRI, 20 (100.0%) MRG-1, and 19 (95.0%) MRG-2. Histology showed 5 cancers (4 women), 15 papillomas (2 with atypia) (11 women), and 6 additional benign lesions (6 women). Five patients (25.0%) had additional lesions detected by ce-MR that influenced surgical management. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative predicted values (NPV) for CG, ce-MRI, MRG-1 were 65.0, 33.3, 76.5, and 22.2; 95.0, 66.7, 90.5, and 80.8; 55.0, 66.7, 84.6, and 30.8, respectively. ce-MR had the highest sensitivity, PPV, and NPV compared with CG or MRG. Our MRG protocols show promise, but were not as sensitive as ce-MRI for women with suspicious nipple discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 362
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Optimized Density-Weighted Imaging for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced 3D-MR Mammography
    Gutberlet, Marcel
    Roth, Anne
    Hahn, Dietbert
    Koestler, Herbert
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 33 (02) : 328 - 339
  • [2] Contrast-enhanced thoracic 3D-MR angiography in infants and children
    Holmqvist, C
    Larsson, EM
    Ståhlbeg, F
    Laurin, S
    ACTA RADIOLOGICA, 2001, 42 (01) : 50 - 58
  • [3] MR ductography: Comparison with conventional ductography as a diagnostic method in patients with nipple discharge
    Hirose, Masanori
    Nobusawa, Hiroshi
    Gokan, Takehiko
    RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 : S183 - S196
  • [4] Differential diagnosis of suspicious breast lesions at conventional mammography: Role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography
    Grandinetti, ML
    Squillaci, E
    Botti, C
    Ciolfi, MG
    Crecco, M
    Simonetti, G
    RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 : 48 - 48
  • [5] Comparison of Contrast Enhanced Mammography and Contrast-Enhanced Breast MR Imaging
    Lewin, John
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2018, 26 (02) : 259 - +
  • [6] Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer
    U. Fischer
    L. Kopka
    U. Brinck
    M. Korabiowska
    A. Schauer
    E. Grabbe
    European Radiology, 1997, 7 : 1002 - 1005
  • [7] Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced MR mammography in patients with breast cancer
    Fischer, U
    Kopka, L
    Brinck, U
    Korabiowska, M
    Schauer, A
    Grabbe, E
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (07) : 1002 - 1005
  • [8] Contrast-enhanced Mammography versus MR Imaging of the Breast
    Mann, Ritse M.
    Longo, Valentina
    RADIOLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 62 (04) : 643 - 659
  • [9] The radial scar in contrast-enhanced MR mammography.
    Baum, F
    Fischer, U
    Füzesi, L
    Obenauer, S
    Vosshenrich, R
    Grabbe, E
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2000, 172 (10): : 817 - 823
  • [10] The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography
    Brinck, U
    Fischer, U
    Korabiowska, M
    Jutrowski, M
    Schauer, A
    Grabbe, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (05) : 1331 - 1334