3D-MR Ductography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Mammography in Patients with Suspicious Nipple Discharge; a Feasibility Study

被引:16
|
作者
Nicholson, Brandi T. [1 ]
Harvey, Jennifer A. [1 ]
Patrie, James T. [2 ]
Mugler, John P., III [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Radiol & Med Imaging, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
[2] Univ Virginia, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22908 USA
来源
BREAST JOURNAL | 2015年 / 21卷 / 04期
关键词
breast magnetic resonance imaging; galactography; indirect magnetic resonance ductography; nipple discharge; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE MAMMOGRAPHY; INTRADUCTAL PAPILLOMA; BREAST-CANCER; GALACTOGRAPHY; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; LESIONS; BIOPSY; DUCT; CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1111/tbj.12417
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
We evaluated contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (ce-MR) imaging and an indirect MR galactogram (MRG) sequence against conventional galactography (CG) in women with suspicious nipple discharge who underwent histologic diagnosis. This study was Institutional Review Board approved and HIPAA compliant. Women with suspicious nipple discharge recommended for CG were recruited for our study. Patients underwent both a ce-MR as well as MRG (MRG-1 and MRG-2, variations in isotropic spatial resolution) followed by CG within 60days. The ce-MR and MRG studies were interpreted together by a single radiologist separately from CG. Pathology was used as our gold standard and was obtained via image-guided core needle biopsy or surgery with papilloma, atypia, and malignancy considered positive. Of the 21 patients recruited for the study, 20 patients had known histology results for 26 lesions; 18 patients (90.0%) had successful CG, 20 (100.0%) ce-MRI, 20 (100.0%) MRG-1, and 19 (95.0%) MRG-2. Histology showed 5 cancers (4 women), 15 papillomas (2 with atypia) (11 women), and 6 additional benign lesions (6 women). Five patients (25.0%) had additional lesions detected by ce-MR that influenced surgical management. Sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative predicted values (NPV) for CG, ce-MRI, MRG-1 were 65.0, 33.3, 76.5, and 22.2; 95.0, 66.7, 90.5, and 80.8; 55.0, 66.7, 84.6, and 30.8, respectively. ce-MR had the highest sensitivity, PPV, and NPV compared with CG or MRG. Our MRG protocols show promise, but were not as sensitive as ce-MRI for women with suspicious nipple discharge.
引用
收藏
页码:352 / 362
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Magnitude subtraction vs. complex subtraction in dynamic contrast-enhanced 3D-MR angiography: Basic experiments and clinical evaluation
    Naganawa, S
    Ito, T
    Iwayama, E
    Fukatsu, H
    Ishiguchi, T
    Ishigaki, T
    Ichinose, N
    JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1999, 10 (05): : 813 - 820
  • [32] Clinical usefulness of contrast enhanced 3D-MR angiography using automated stepping table method
    Kubo, H
    Sakuma, H
    Katoh, N
    Maki, H
    Asanuma, G
    Araki, A
    Takeda, K
    ULTRAFAST MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING IN MEDICINE, 1999, 1192 : 135 - 137
  • [33] New subtraction algorithms for evaluation of lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography
    Choi, BG
    Kim, HH
    Kim, EN
    Kim, BS
    Han, JY
    Yoo, SS
    Park, SH
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2002, 12 (12) : 3018 - 3022
  • [34] Contrast-enhanced color Doppler measurements of breast lesions in comparison with MR mammography
    Marx, C
    Fleck, M
    Pudszuhn, A
    Przetak, CG
    Wurdinger, S
    Kaiser, WA
    RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 : 1480 - 1480
  • [35] The role of contrast-enhanced MR mammography for determining candidates for breast conservation surgery
    Zhang Yu.
    Fukatsu H.
    Naganawa S.
    Satake H.
    Sato Y.
    Ohiwa M.
    Endo T.
    Ichihara S.
    Ishigaki T.
    Breast Cancer, 2002, 9 (3) : 231 - 239
  • [36] Classification improvement by segmentation refinement: Application to contrast-enhanced MR-mammography
    Tanner, C
    Khazen, M
    Kessar, P
    Leach, MO
    Hawkes, DJ
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2004, PT 1, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 3216 : 184 - 191
  • [37] Contrast-Enhanced MR Mammography: Improved Lesion Detection and Differentiation with Gadobenate Dimeglumine
    Pediconi, Federica
    Catalano, Carlo
    Padula, Simona
    Roselli, Antonella
    Dominelli, Valeria
    Cagioli, Sabrina
    Kirchin, Miles A.
    Pirovano, Gianpaolo
    Passariello, Roberto
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 191 (05) : 1339 - 1346
  • [38] Contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography using SENSE in multiple stations: Feasibility study
    de Vries, M
    Nijenhuis, RJ
    Hoogeveen, RM
    de Haan, MW
    van Engelshoven, JMA
    Leiner, T
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2005, 21 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [39] New subtraction algorithms for evaluation of lesions on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography
    Byung Choi
    Hak Kim
    Euy Kim
    Bum-soo Kim
    Ji-Youn Han
    Seung-Schik Yoo
    Seog Park
    European Radiology, 2002, 12 : 3018 - 3022
  • [40] Applications of 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography in pediatric oncology
    Haliloglu, M
    Hoffer, FA
    Gronemeyer, SA
    Rao, BN
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 1999, 29 (11) : 863 - 868