Search strategies for reasoning about spatial ontologies

被引:2
|
作者
Pais, J [1 ]
Pinto-Ferreira, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Sistemas & Robot, Inst Super Tecn, P-1096 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
D O I
10.1109/TAI.1998.744880
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The utilization of spatial ontologies to representing and reasoning about real-world problems exhibits some advantages when compared with traditional approaches. Namely reification, flexibility, efficiency and process understanding are considerably improved However, the search mechanism, which underlies the reasoning process, always has exponential complexity, mainly because real-world problems produce models with high branching factors and solution depths. Therefore, the study and implementation of control strategies and cooperation among them are essential to meet the challenge of search complexity reduction [1]. In particular, improvements on two fundamental steps of the process - successor generation and state completion - can reduce drastically the search effort. In this paper some search strategies are introduced such as the utilization factor and the use of several lists of open nodes. Some classical approaches as sub-goaling and heuristic search are applied to the problem of controlling the process of reasoning about spatial ontologies. Other aim of this paper is to discussing some kinds of cooperation among the previous search strategies to reaching a search complexity reduction. The proposed search strategies were incorporated in a reasoner implemented in Prolog, whose performance has shown drastical improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 422
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The complexity of reasoning about spatial congruence
    Cristani, M
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 1999, 11 : 361 - 390
  • [32] Reasoning about Qualitative Spatial Relationships
    A. Prasad Sistla
    Clement Yu
    Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2000, 25 : 291 - 328
  • [33] Gender differences in spatial reasoning strategies
    Glueck, J
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 35 (3-4) : 394 - 394
  • [34] Alternative Strategies for Spatial Reasoning with Diagrams
    Stieff, Mike
    Hegarty, Mary
    Dixon, Bonnie
    DIAGRAMMATIC REPRESENTATION AND INFERENCE, 2010, 6170 : 115 - +
  • [35] Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies
    方俊
    Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2010, 15 (06) : 687 - 691
  • [36] Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies
    Fang J.
    Huang Z.
    Tsinghua Science and Technology, 2010, 15 (06) : 687 - 691
  • [37] Reasoning with Inconsistent Ontologies
    Huang, Zhisheng
    van Harmelen, Frank
    ten Teije, Annette
    19TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI-05), 2005, : 454 - 459
  • [38] Reasoning about proof search specifications: An abstract
    Miller, D
    THEOREM PROVING IN HIGHER ORDER LOGICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, 2758 : 204 - 204
  • [39] Reasoning with rules and ontologies
    Eiter, Thomas
    Ianni, Giovambattista
    Polleres, Axel
    Schindlauer, Roman
    Tompits, Hans
    REASONING WEB, 2006, 4126 : 93 - 127
  • [40] Reasoning with Probabilistic Ontologies
    Riguzzi, Fabrizio
    Bellodi, Elena
    Lamma, Evelina
    Zese, Riccardo
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE TWENTY-FOURTH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (IJCAI), 2015, : 4310 - 4316