Search strategies for reasoning about spatial ontologies

被引:2
|
作者
Pais, J [1 ]
Pinto-Ferreira, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tecn Lisboa, Inst Sistemas & Robot, Inst Super Tecn, P-1096 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
D O I
10.1109/TAI.1998.744880
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The utilization of spatial ontologies to representing and reasoning about real-world problems exhibits some advantages when compared with traditional approaches. Namely reification, flexibility, efficiency and process understanding are considerably improved However, the search mechanism, which underlies the reasoning process, always has exponential complexity, mainly because real-world problems produce models with high branching factors and solution depths. Therefore, the study and implementation of control strategies and cooperation among them are essential to meet the challenge of search complexity reduction [1]. In particular, improvements on two fundamental steps of the process - successor generation and state completion - can reduce drastically the search effort. In this paper some search strategies are introduced such as the utilization factor and the use of several lists of open nodes. Some classical approaches as sub-goaling and heuristic search are applied to the problem of controlling the process of reasoning about spatial ontologies. Other aim of this paper is to discussing some kinds of cooperation among the previous search strategies to reaching a search complexity reduction. The proposed search strategies were incorporated in a reasoner implemented in Prolog, whose performance has shown drastical improvements.
引用
收藏
页码:418 / 422
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] REASONING ABOUT STRATEGIES: ON THE SATISFIABILITY PROBLEM
    Mogavero, Fabio
    Murano, Aniello
    Perelli, Giuseppe
    Vardi, Moshe Y.
    LOGICAL METHODS IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2017, 13 (01)
  • [22] Representing and Reasoning about Game Strategies
    Dongmo Zhang
    Michael Thielscher
    Journal of Philosophical Logic, 2015, 44 : 203 - 236
  • [23] Reasoning about Exceptions in Ontologies: from the Lexicographic Closure to the Skeptical Closure
    Giordano, Laura
    Gliozzi, Valentina
    FUNDAMENTA INFORMATICAE, 2020, 176 (3-4) : 235 - 269
  • [24] Reasoning About Actions with EL Ontologies and Temporal Answer Sets for DLTL
    Giordano, Laura
    Martelli, Alberto
    Dupre, Daniele Theseider
    LOGIC PROGRAMMING AND NONMONOTONIC REASONING, LPNMR 2022, 2022, 13416 : 231 - 244
  • [25] The Complexity of Reasoning about Spatial Congruence
    Dipto. Scientifico e Tecnologico, Università di Verona, Cà Vignal 2, strada Le Grazie, I-37134 Verona, Italy
    J Artif Intell Res, 0 (361-390):
  • [26] Reasoning visually about spatial interactions
    Narayanan, N. Hari
    Chandrasekaran, B.
    IJCAI, Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1600, 1
  • [27] Expressive reasoning about cultural heritage knowledge using web ontologies
    Koutsomitropoulos, Dimitrios A.
    Papatheodorou, Theodore S.
    WEBIST 2007: PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WEB INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES, VOL WIA: WEB INTERFACES AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, : 276 - +
  • [28] Plausible Reasoning about EL-Ontologies using Concept Interpolation
    Ibanez-Garcia, Yazmin
    Gutierrez-Basulto, Victor
    Schockaert, Steven
    KR2020: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 17TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PRINCIPLES OF KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING, 2020, : 506 - 516
  • [29] DEFAULT REASONING ABOUT SPATIAL OCCUPANCY
    SHANAHAN, M
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 1995, 74 (01) : 147 - 163
  • [30] Reasoning about qualitative spatial relationships
    Sistla, AP
    Yu, C
    JOURNAL OF AUTOMATED REASONING, 2000, 25 (04) : 291 - 328