Percutaneous extraction of cardiac pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads with evolution mechanical dilator sheath: a single-centre experience

被引:36
|
作者
Oto, Ali [1 ]
Aytemir, Kudret [1 ]
Yorgun, Hikmet [1 ]
Canpolat, Ugur [1 ]
Kaya, Ergun Baris [1 ]
Kabakci, Giray [1 ]
Tokgozoglu, Lale [1 ]
Ozkutlu, Hilmi [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, TR-06100 Ankara, Turkey
来源
EUROPACE | 2011年 / 13卷 / 04期
关键词
Evolution mechanical sheath; Percutaneous lead extraction; TRANSVENOUS PACEMAKER; INITIAL-EXPERIENCE; INFECTIONS; MANAGEMENT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1093/europace/euq400
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aims The growing problem with endocardial lead infections and lead malfunctions has increased the interest in percutaneous lead removal technology. In this report, we present our initial experience in percutaneous lead extraction with a novel hand-powered sheath, the Evolution mechanical dilator sheath. Methods and results During 13 months between June 2009 and July 2010, 41 leads in 23 patients were removed. All of the extracted leads were >12 months old, and indications for extraction were based on the recommendations of the Heart Rhythm Society. The leads were removed by using the Evolution mechanical dilator sheath (Cook Medical) with the rotational cutting force only, without laser or radiofrequency energy. Indications for lead removal included cardiac device infection in 7 (30.4%) cases, lead malfunction in the 15 (65.2%) cases, and lead displacement in the remaining 1 case (4.4%). In 14 (60.9%) cases, the extracted device was a pacemaker, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) in 9 (39.1%) of them. Among 41 leads, 25 (60.9%) were right ventricular, 14 (34%) were atrial, and 2 (4.8%) were coronary sinus electrode. The median time from the preceding procedure was 74 months (25-180 months). Complete procedural success with Evolution system alone was achieved in 19 (82%) patients (35 leads). Four leads were completely removed with snaring and in two leads, partial success was achieved with a remaining ventricular tip smaller than 1.5 cm. Clinical success was 100%, and all of the patients discharged uneventfully without a major complication. Conclusions Our experience confirms that the mechanical technique with Evolution system is an effective first-line method for chronically implanted pacemaker/ICD leads. Continued investigation is required to evaluate success and complication rates in comparison with other techniques.
引用
收藏
页码:543 / 547
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Transfemoral extraction of pacemaker and implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads using Needle's Eye Snare: a single-center experience of more than 900 leads
    Zhou, Xu
    Ze, Feng
    Li, Ding
    Wang, Long
    Duan, Jiangbo
    Yuan, Cuizhen
    He, Jinshan
    Guo, Jihong
    Li, Xuebin
    HEART AND VESSELS, 2020, 35 (06) : 825 - 834
  • [22] Percutaneous Extraction of Transvenous Permanent Pacemaker/Defibrillator Leads-A Single-Center Experience
    Akcay, Murat
    Yuksel, Serkan
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2024, 60 (08):
  • [23] Initial experience with a laser sheath to extract chronic transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator leads
    Krishnan, SC
    Epstein, LM
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 82 (10): : 1293 - +
  • [24] Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in young individuals: comparison of conventional and subcostal approaches-a single-centre experience
    Irfan, Ghazala
    Czapla, Jens
    Saitoh, Yukio
    Ciconte, Giuseppe
    Mugnai, Giacomo
    Conte, Giulio
    Hunuk, Burak
    Velagic, Vedran
    Stroker, Erwin
    Chierchia, Gian Battista
    Nijs, Jan
    La Meir, Marc
    Wellens, Francis
    Brugada, Pedro
    De Asmundis, Carlo
    EUROPACE, 2017, 19 (01): : 81 - 87
  • [25] EFFECT OF SHOCK THERAPY FROM IMPLANTABLE CARDIAC DEFIBRILLATOR ON ANXIETY LEVELS: A SINGLE-CENTRE EXPERIENCE
    Arif, Sayqa
    Shattock, Lucy
    English, Lorraine
    Hughes, Susan
    Todd, Derick
    Mahida, Saagar
    Rao, Archana
    HEART, 2018, 104 : A19 - A20
  • [26] Performance of the Linox implantable cardioverter defibrillator leads: A single-center experience
    Marai, Ibrahim
    Milman, Anat
    Nof, Eyal
    Gurevitz, Osnat
    Barlev, David
    Lipchenca, Igor
    Bachar, Sharona
    Glikson, Michael
    Beinart, Roy
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2019, 42 (12): : 1524 - 1528
  • [27] Pregnancy outcome and management of women with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator: a single centre experience
    Schuler, Pia K.
    Herrey, Anna
    Wade, Angie
    Brooks, Ruth
    Peebles, Donald
    Lambiase, Pier
    Walker, Fiona
    EUROPACE, 2012, 14 (12): : 1740 - 1745
  • [28] Management of obstetric patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD): a single centre experience
    Wan-Hussein, H. Y.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 34 - 34
  • [29] Proximity of Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Leads to Coronary Arteries as Assessed by Cardiac Computed Tomography
    Pang, Benjamin J.
    Joshi, Subodh B.
    Lui, Elaine H.
    Tacey, Mark A.
    Alison, Jeff
    Seneviratne, Sujith K.
    Cameron, James D.
    Mond, Harry G.
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2014, 37 (06): : 717 - 723
  • [30] Use of the Mechanical Dilator Sheath for Removal of Endocardial Leads: A Single Center Experience
    Aksu, Tolga
    Guray, Umit
    Sen, Taner
    Durukan, Mine
    Guray, Yesim
    Demirkan, Burcu
    Kisacik, Halil
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2012, 35 (05): : 514 - 518