Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20

被引:140
|
作者
Tang, Gong [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Shak, Steven [2 ]
Paik, Soonmyung [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Anderson, Stewart J. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Costantino, Joseph P. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Geyer, Charles E., Jr. [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Mamounas, Eleftherios P. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wickerham, D. Lawrence [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wolmark, Norman [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Genom Hlth Inc, Redwood City, CA USA
[3] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[4] Aultman Hlth Fdn, Canton, OH USA
[5] Div Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Ctr Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project Operat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Oncotype DX; Recurrence Score; Adjuvant; Node-negative; ER-positive; GENE-EXPRESSION; TAMOXIFEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; KI67; ANASTROZOLE; VALIDATION; SIGNATURE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-010-1331-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Oncotype DXA (R) Recurrence Score(A (R)) (RS) is a validated genomic predictor of outcome and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancer. Adjuvant! was developed using SEER registry data and results from the Early Breast Cancer Clinical Trialists' overview analyses to estimate outcome and benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. In this report we compare the prognostic and predictive utility of these two tools in node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer. RS and Adjuvant! results were available from 668 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-14 patients, 227 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-20 patients, and 424 chemotherapy plus tamoxifen-treated B-20 patients. Adjuvant! results were also available from 1952 B-20 patients. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the prognostic and predictive utility of RS and Adjuvant!. Both RS (P < 0.001) and Adjuvant! (P = 0.002) provided strong independent prognostic information in tamoxifen-treated patients. Combining RS and individual clinicopathologic characteristics provided greater prognostic discrimination than combining RS and the composite Adjuvant!. In the B-20 cohort with RS results (n = 651), RS was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit (interaction P = 0.031 for DRFI, P = 0.011 for overall survival [OS], P = 0.082 for disease-free survival [DFS]), but Adjuvant! was not (interaction P = 0.99, P = 0.311, and P = 0.357, respectively). However, in the larger B-20 sub-cohort (n = 1952), Adjuvant! was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit for OS (interaction P = 0.009) but not for DRFI (P = 0.219) or DFS (P = 0.099). Prognostic estimates can be optimized by combining RS and clinicopathologic information instead of simply combining RS and Adjuvant!. RS should be used for estimating relative chemotherapy benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A 95-gene signature stratifies recurrence risk of invasive disease in ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer with intermediate 21-gene signature recurrence scores
    Fujii, Takeo
    Masuda, Hiroko
    Cheng, Yee Chung
    Yang, Fei
    Sahin, Aysegul A.
    Naoi, Yasuto
    Matsunaga, Yuki
    Raghavendra, Akshara
    Sinha, Arup Kumar
    Fernandez, Jose Rodrigo Espinosa
    James, Anjali
    Yamagishi, Keisuke
    Matsushima, Tomoko
    Schuetz, Robert
    Tripathy, Debu
    Tada, Sachiyo
    Jackson, Rubie S.
    Noguchi, Shinzaburo
    Nakamura, Seigo
    Acoba, Jared D.
    Ueno, Naoto T.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2021, 189 (02) : 455 - 461
  • [32] 21-Gene Recurrence Score for prognosis and prediction of taxane benefit after adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy: results from NSABP B-28/NRG Oncology
    Eleftherios P. Mamounas
    Gong Tang
    Soonmyung Paik
    Frederick L. Baehner
    Qing Liu
    Jong-Hyeon Jeong
    S. Rim Kim
    Steven M. Butler
    Farid Jamshidian
    Diana B. Cherbavaz
    Amy P. Sing
    Steven Shak
    Thomas B. Julian
    Barry C. Lembersky
    D. Lawrence Wickerham
    Joseph P. Costantino
    Norman Wolmark
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 168 : 69 - 77
  • [33] 21-Gene Recurrence Score for prognosis and prediction of taxane benefit after adjuvant chemotherapy plus endocrine therapy: results from NSABP B-28/NRG Oncology
    Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
    Tang, Gong
    Paik, Soonmyung
    Baehner, Frederick L.
    Liu, Qing
    Jeong, Jong-Hyeon
    Kim, S. Rim
    Butler, Steven M.
    Jamshidian, Farid
    Cherbavaz, Diana B.
    Sing, Amy P.
    Shak, Steven
    Julian, Thomas B.
    Lembersky, Barry C.
    Wickerham, D. Lawrence
    Costantino, Joseph P.
    Wolmark, Norman
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 168 (01) : 69 - 77
  • [34] Prospective Evaluation of the Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay on Adjuvant Treatment Decisions for Women with Node-Positive Breast Cancer in Ontario, Canada
    Torres, Sofia
    Trudeau, Maureen
    Gandhi, Sonal
    Warner, Ellen
    Verma, Sunil
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Petrella, Teresa
    Hew-Shue, Mark
    Chao, Calvin
    Eisen, Andrea
    ONCOLOGIST, 2018, 23 (07): : 768 - 775
  • [35] Prospective evaluation of the impact of the 21-gene recurrence score® assay on adjuvant treatment decisions for women with node-positive breast cancer in Ontario, Canada
    Torres, S.
    Trudeau, M.
    Gandhi, S.
    Warner, E.
    Verma, S.
    Pritchard, K.
    Petrella, T.
    Slodkowska, E.
    Hew-Shue, M.
    Chao, C.
    Eisen, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2016, 27
  • [36] Prognostic and predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in postmenopausal women with node-positive, oestrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer on chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis of a randomised trial
    Albain, Kathy S.
    Barlow, William E.
    Shak, Steven
    Hortobagyi, Gabriel N.
    Livingston, Robert B.
    Yeh, I-Tien
    Ravdin, Peter
    Bugarini, Roberto
    Boehner, Frederick L.
    Davidson, Nancy E.
    Sledge, George W.
    Winer, Eric P.
    Hudis, Clifford
    Ingle, James N.
    Perez, Edith A.
    Pritchard, Kathleen I.
    Shepherd, Lois
    Gralow, Julie R.
    Yoshizawa, Carl
    Allred, D. Craig
    Osborne, C. Kent
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (01): : 55 - 65
  • [37] Using the 21-gene recurrence score and the recently developed Recurrence Score-Clinical-Pathologic to assess recurrence risk in patients with node-negative, ER-positive early-stage breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor treatment alone.
    Crager, M.
    Tang, G.
    Shak, S.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (15)
  • [38] Prospective Study of the Effect of the 21-Gene Assay on Adjuvant Clinical Decision-Making in Japanese Women With Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Node-Negative, and Node-Positive Breast Cancer
    Yamauchi, Hideko
    Nakagawa, Chizuko
    Takei, Hiroyuki
    Chao, Calvin
    Yoshizawa, Carl
    Yagata, Hiroshi
    Yoshida, Atsushi
    Hayashi, Naoki
    Hell, Susanne
    Nakamura, Seigo
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2014, 14 (03) : 191 - 197
  • [39] A retrospective study of 21-gene recurrence score assay compared with clinicopathological markers in node-negative, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer.
    Chen, Junqing
    Wang, Xiaojia
    Chen, Zhanhong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2017, 35
  • [40] Implications of the 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DX) on adjuvant treatment decisions in ER-positive early-stage breast cancer patients: experience of Kuwait Cancer Control Center
    Salah Fayaz
    Heba El-Sayed Eissa
    Gerges Attia Demian
    Journal of the Egyptian National Cancer Institute, 32