Comparison of the prognostic and predictive utilities of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and Adjuvant! for women with node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer: results from NSABP B-14 and NSABP B-20

被引:140
|
作者
Tang, Gong [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Shak, Steven [2 ]
Paik, Soonmyung [5 ,6 ,7 ]
Anderson, Stewart J. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Costantino, Joseph P. [1 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Geyer, Charles E., Jr. [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Mamounas, Eleftherios P. [4 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wickerham, D. Lawrence [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
Wolmark, Norman [3 ,5 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Grad Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[2] Genom Hlth Inc, Redwood City, CA USA
[3] Allegheny Gen Hosp, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[4] Aultman Hlth Fdn, Canton, OH USA
[5] Div Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Ctr Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[7] Natl Surg Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project Operat, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Breast cancer; Oncotype DX; Recurrence Score; Adjuvant; Node-negative; ER-positive; GENE-EXPRESSION; TAMOXIFEN; CHEMOTHERAPY; KI67; ANASTROZOLE; VALIDATION; SIGNATURE; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10549-010-1331-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The Oncotype DXA (R) Recurrence Score(A (R)) (RS) is a validated genomic predictor of outcome and response to adjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancer. Adjuvant! was developed using SEER registry data and results from the Early Breast Cancer Clinical Trialists' overview analyses to estimate outcome and benefit from adjuvant hormonal therapy and chemotherapy. In this report we compare the prognostic and predictive utility of these two tools in node-negative, ER-positive breast cancer. RS and Adjuvant! results were available from 668 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-14 patients, 227 tamoxifen-treated NSABP B-20 patients, and 424 chemotherapy plus tamoxifen-treated B-20 patients. Adjuvant! results were also available from 1952 B-20 patients. The primary endpoint was distant recurrence-free interval (DRFI). Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the prognostic and predictive utility of RS and Adjuvant!. Both RS (P < 0.001) and Adjuvant! (P = 0.002) provided strong independent prognostic information in tamoxifen-treated patients. Combining RS and individual clinicopathologic characteristics provided greater prognostic discrimination than combining RS and the composite Adjuvant!. In the B-20 cohort with RS results (n = 651), RS was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit (interaction P = 0.031 for DRFI, P = 0.011 for overall survival [OS], P = 0.082 for disease-free survival [DFS]), but Adjuvant! was not (interaction P = 0.99, P = 0.311, and P = 0.357, respectively). However, in the larger B-20 sub-cohort (n = 1952), Adjuvant! was significantly predictive of chemotherapy benefit for OS (interaction P = 0.009) but not for DRFI (P = 0.219) or DFS (P = 0.099). Prognostic estimates can be optimized by combining RS and clinicopathologic information instead of simply combining RS and Adjuvant!. RS should be used for estimating relative chemotherapy benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of the 21-gene recurrence score assay in adjuvant chemotherapy selection for node-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in the Chinese population
    Zhang, Y. N.
    Zhou, Y. D.
    Mao, F.
    Sun, Q.
    NEOPLASMA, 2015, 62 (04) : 658 - 665
  • [22] Prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score in ER-positive,HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer was similar in node-negative diseases: a single-center study of 800 patients
    Jiayi Wu
    Weiqi Gao
    Xiaosong Chen
    Chunxiao Fei
    Lin Lin
    Weiguo Chen
    Ou Huang
    Siji Zhu
    Jianrong He
    Yafen Li
    Li Zhu
    Kunwei Shen
    Frontiers of Medicine, 2021, 15 (04) : 621 - 628
  • [23] Prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score in ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer was similar in node-negative diseases: a single-center study of 800 patients
    Jiayi Wu
    Weiqi Gao
    Xiaosong Chen
    Chunxiao Fei
    Lin Lin
    Weiguo Chen
    Ou Huang
    Siji Zhu
    Jianrong He
    Yafen Li
    Li Zhu
    Kunwei Shen
    Frontiers of Medicine, 2021, 15 : 621 - 628
  • [24] Prognostic value of the 21-gene recurrence score in ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-positive breast cancer was similar in node-negative diseases: a single-center study of 800 patients
    Wu, Jiayi
    Gao, Weiqi
    Chen, Xiaosong
    Fei, Chunxiao
    Lin, Lin
    Chen, Weiguo
    Huang, Ou
    Zhu, Siji
    He, Jianrong
    Li, Yafen
    Zhu, Li
    Shen, Kunwei
    FRONTIERS OF MEDICINE, 2021, 15 (04) : 621 - 628
  • [25] Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Compared With Standard Clinicopathologic Guidelines in Adjuvant Therapy Selection for Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Partin, Jessica F.
    Mamounas, Eleftherios P.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 18 (12) : 3399 - 3406
  • [26] Impact of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay Compared With Standard Clinicopathologic Guidelines in Adjuvant Therapy Selection for Node-Negative, Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer
    Jessica F. Partin
    Eleftherios P. Mamounas
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2011, 18 : 3399 - 3406
  • [27] Clinical significance of 21-gene recurrence score assay for hormone receptor-positive, lymph node-negative breast cancer in early stage
    Yang Yu-qing
    Wang Lei
    Huang Mei-ling
    Xiao Jing-jing
    Wei Mei-chen
    Wu Jiang
    Hao Jun-sheng
    Ling Rui
    Li Nan-lin
    EXPERIMENTAL AND MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, 2019, 108 : 150 - 155
  • [28] Prospective transGEICAM study of the impact of the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay and traditional clinicopathological factors on adjuvant clinical decision making in women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER plus ) node-negative breast cancer
    Albanell, J.
    Gonzalez, A.
    Ruiz-Borrego, M.
    Alba, E.
    Garcia-Saenz, J. A.
    Corominas, J. M.
    Burgues, O.
    Furio, V.
    Rojo, A.
    Palacios, J.
    Bermejo, B.
    Martinez-Garcia, M.
    Limon, M. L.
    Munoz, A. S.
    Martin, M.
    Tusquets, I.
    Rojo, F.
    Colomer, R.
    Faull, I.
    Lluch, A.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2012, 23 (03) : 625 - 631
  • [30] A 95-gene signature stratifies recurrence risk of invasive disease in ER-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer with intermediate 21-gene signature recurrence scores
    Takeo Fujii
    Hiroko Masuda
    Yee Chung Cheng
    Fei Yang
    Aysegul A. Sahin
    Yasuto Naoi
    Yuki Matsunaga
    Akshara Raghavendra
    Arup Kumar Sinha
    Jose Rodrigo Espinosa Fernandez
    Anjali James
    Keisuke Yamagishi
    Tomoko Matsushima
    Robert Schuetz
    Debu Tripathy
    Sachiyo Tada
    Rubie S. Jackson
    Shinzaburo Noguchi
    Seigo Nakamura
    Jared D. Acoba
    Naoto T. Ueno
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2021, 189 : 455 - 461