Cervical Arthroplasty Using the Bryan Cervical Disc System

被引:0
|
作者
Weber, Friedrich [1 ]
Detzner, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Kliniken Stadt Koln GmbH, Neurochirurg Klin, D-51109 Cologne, Germany
来源
OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE | 2010年 / 22卷 / 5-6期
关键词
Arthroplasty; Cervical disk prolapse; Disk prosthesis; Radiculopathy; Myelopathy; Range of motion; Heterotopic ossification; INTERMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP; SINGLE-LEVEL; ADJACENT-SEGMENT; PROSTHESIS; FUSION; SPINE; ARTHRODESIS; DISEASE; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00064-010-9031-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Treatment of radicular or myelopathic symptoms of the vertebral segments from C2 through Th1. Discogenic and/or spondylotic radiculopathy. Acute myelopathy. Acute or progressive functional neurological deficit. Persistent pain resistant toward conservative treatment for > 6 weeks. Chronic myelopathy. Spondylotic myelopathy. Infection. Tumor in the vertebral segment. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Metabolic bone disease. Osteoporosis. Long-lasting steroid medication. Allergy to titanium, polyurethane and ethylene oxide. Bekhterev's disease. Bony segmental fusion. Instability. Using the Bryan Cervical Disc Template Set together with magnetic resonance or computer tomographic images, the exact size of the prosthesis will be selected. The patient is lying in a supine position and the level of surgery is verified fluoroscopically. Diskectomy and decompression are performed via an anterior approach. After preparation of the implant bed, the center of the disk space is established using a transverse centering tool and inserting the Bryan cervical distractor. Before the prosthesis can be inserted, the end plates have to be milled. The prosthesis is filled with sterile saline solution and inserted. Proper fitting is verified fluoroscopically. Depending on the clinical situation postoperatively, the patient is discharged. Wound clamps are distracted on day 8, support by a cervical collar is not necessary. Light physical manipulations for muscle relaxation can be performed. Since 2002, 178 patients have received at least one Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. 92 patients had a complete follow- up. Examinations were performed 8 and 12 weeks, respectively, as well as 6 up to 44 months postoperatively. 29 patients received a hybrid implantation. Cobb's angle and range of motion were determined radiologically, the degree of heterotopic ossification was classified according to McAfee. Disk prosthesis placement was measured in relation to the dorsal edge of the vertebral body, the center of the spine, as well as the body axes. For clinical evaluation, the Oswestry Neck Disability Index was used, and the neurostatus was determined.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 479
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Adjacent Level Degeneration Bryan Total Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
    Miller, Justin
    Sasso, Rick
    Anderson, Paul
    Riew, K. Daniel
    McPhilamy, Austin
    Gianaris, Thomas
    CLINICAL SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 31 (02): : E98 - E101
  • [42] Metallosis after traumatic loosening of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review
    Yang, Chih-Chan
    Tang, Chien-Lun
    Tzeng, Chung-Yuh
    Tsou, Hsi-Kai
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 : S415 - S420
  • [43] Eight-Year Clinical and Radiological Follow-Up of the Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
    Quan, Gerald M. Y.
    Vital, Jean-Marc
    Hansen, Steve
    Pointillart, Vincent
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (08) : 639 - 646
  • [44] Bone ingrowth in retrieved Bryan Cervical Disc prostheses
    Jensen, WK
    Anderson, PA
    Nel, L
    Rouleau, JP
    SPINE, 2005, 30 (22) : 2497 - 2502
  • [45] Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis
    Botelho, RV
    NEUROSURGERY, 2003, 53 (03) : 785 - 785
  • [46] Preliminary clinical experience with the Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis
    Goffin, J
    Casey, A
    Kehr, P
    Liebig, K
    Lind, B
    Logroscino, C
    Pointillart, V
    Van Calenbergh, F
    van Loon, J
    NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (03) : 840 - 845
  • [47] A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion combined with cervical disc arthroplasty and cervical disc arthroplasty for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease A retrospective study
    Wu, Ting-kui
    Wang, Bei-yu
    Deng, Ming-dan
    Hong, Ying
    Rong, Xin
    Chen, Hua
    Meng, Yang
    Liu, Hao
    MEDICINE, 2017, 96 (41)
  • [48] Hybrid cervical disc arthroplasty for cervical myelopathy associated with congenital cervical stenosis
    Li, Yawei
    Lv, Guohua
    Wang, Bing
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2018, 28 (04) : 455 - 455
  • [49] Comparison of adverse events between the Bryan artificial cervical disc and anterior cervical arthrodesis
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Sasso, Rick C.
    Riew, K. Daniel
    SPINE, 2008, 33 (12) : 1305 - 1312
  • [50] Fusion versus Bryan Cervical Disc in two-level cervical disc disease: a prospective, randomised study
    Cheng, Lei
    Nie, Lin
    Zhang, Li
    Hou, Yong
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2009, 33 (05) : 1347 - 1351