Cervical Arthroplasty Using the Bryan Cervical Disc System

被引:0
|
作者
Weber, Friedrich [1 ]
Detzner, Michael [1 ]
机构
[1] Kliniken Stadt Koln GmbH, Neurochirurg Klin, D-51109 Cologne, Germany
来源
OPERATIVE ORTHOPADIE UND TRAUMATOLOGIE | 2010年 / 22卷 / 5-6期
关键词
Arthroplasty; Cervical disk prolapse; Disk prosthesis; Radiculopathy; Myelopathy; Range of motion; Heterotopic ossification; INTERMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP; SINGLE-LEVEL; ADJACENT-SEGMENT; PROSTHESIS; FUSION; SPINE; ARTHRODESIS; DISEASE; REPLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00064-010-9031-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Treatment of radicular or myelopathic symptoms of the vertebral segments from C2 through Th1. Discogenic and/or spondylotic radiculopathy. Acute myelopathy. Acute or progressive functional neurological deficit. Persistent pain resistant toward conservative treatment for > 6 weeks. Chronic myelopathy. Spondylotic myelopathy. Infection. Tumor in the vertebral segment. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Metabolic bone disease. Osteoporosis. Long-lasting steroid medication. Allergy to titanium, polyurethane and ethylene oxide. Bekhterev's disease. Bony segmental fusion. Instability. Using the Bryan Cervical Disc Template Set together with magnetic resonance or computer tomographic images, the exact size of the prosthesis will be selected. The patient is lying in a supine position and the level of surgery is verified fluoroscopically. Diskectomy and decompression are performed via an anterior approach. After preparation of the implant bed, the center of the disk space is established using a transverse centering tool and inserting the Bryan cervical distractor. Before the prosthesis can be inserted, the end plates have to be milled. The prosthesis is filled with sterile saline solution and inserted. Proper fitting is verified fluoroscopically. Depending on the clinical situation postoperatively, the patient is discharged. Wound clamps are distracted on day 8, support by a cervical collar is not necessary. Light physical manipulations for muscle relaxation can be performed. Since 2002, 178 patients have received at least one Bryan Cervical Disc Prosthesis. 92 patients had a complete follow- up. Examinations were performed 8 and 12 weeks, respectively, as well as 6 up to 44 months postoperatively. 29 patients received a hybrid implantation. Cobb's angle and range of motion were determined radiologically, the degree of heterotopic ossification was classified according to McAfee. Disk prosthesis placement was measured in relation to the dorsal edge of the vertebral body, the center of the spine, as well as the body axes. For clinical evaluation, the Oswestry Neck Disability Index was used, and the neurostatus was determined.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 479
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Randomized, Controlled, Multicenter, Clinical Trial Comparing BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion in China
    Zhang, Xuesong
    Zhang, Xuelian
    Chen, Chao
    Zhang, Yonggang
    Wang, Zheng
    Wang, Bin
    Yan, Wangjun
    Li, Ming
    Yuan, Wen
    Wang, Yan
    SPINE, 2012, 37 (06) : 433 - 438
  • [32] Sagittal Alignment After Bryan Cervical Arthroplasty
    Sasso, Rick C.
    Metcalf, Newton H.
    Hipp, John A.
    Wharton, Nicholas D.
    Anderson, Paul A.
    SPINE, 2011, 36 (13) : 991 - 996
  • [33] Anterior bone loss after cervical Bryan disc arthroplasty: insight into the biomechanics following total disc replacement
    Chen, Tse-Yu
    Chen, Wen-Hsien
    Tzeng, Chung-Yuh
    Huang, Chi-Wei
    Yang, Chih-Chang
    Chen, Hsien-Te
    Chang, Chien-Chun
    Lee, Cheng-Ying
    Tsou, Hsi-Kai
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 20 (08): : 1211 - 1218
  • [34] The Rationale for Cervical Disc Arthroplasty
    Hsu, Wellington K.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 25 (02) : 84 - 87
  • [35] Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty
    Basho, Rahul
    Hood, Kenneth A.
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 2 (02) : 105 - 108
  • [36] History of cervical disc arthroplasty
    Baaj, Ali A.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Vale, Fernando L.
    Preul, Mark C.
    Crawford, Neil R.
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2009, 27 (03) : E10.1 - E10.7
  • [37] Effect of arthroplasty design on cervical spine kinematics: analysis of the Bryan Disc, ProDisc-C, and Synergy Disc
    Lazaro, Bruno C. R.
    Yucesoy, Kemal
    Yuksel, Kasim Z.
    Kowalczyk, Izabela
    Rabin, Doron
    Fink, Marie
    Duggal, Neil
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2010, 28 (06) : 1 - 8
  • [38] Comparison of BRYAN Cervical Disc Arthroplasty With Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion Clinical and Radiographic Results of a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial
    Heller, John G.
    Sasso, Rick C.
    Papadopoulos, Stephen M.
    Anderson, Paul A.
    Fessler, Richard G.
    Hacker, Robert J.
    Coric, Domagoj
    Cauthen, Joseph C.
    Riew, Daniel K.
    SPINE, 2009, 34 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [39] Is cervical disc arthroplasty good for congenital cervical stenosis?
    Chang, Peng-Yuan
    Chang, Hsuan-Kan
    Wu, Jau-Ching
    Huang, Wen-Cheng
    Fay, Li-Yu
    Tu, Tsung-Hsi
    Wu, Ching-Lan
    Cheng, Henrich
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2017, 26 (05) : 577 - 585
  • [40] Metallosis after traumatic loosening of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty: a case report and literature review
    Chih-Chan Yang
    Chien-Lun Tang
    Chung-Yuh Tzeng
    Hsi-Kai Tsou
    European Spine Journal, 2018, 27 : 415 - 420