Biosecurity policy and legislation for the global seaweed aquaculture industry

被引:42
|
作者
Campbell, Iona [1 ]
Kambey, Cicilia S. B. [2 ]
Mateo, Jonalyn P. [3 ]
Rusekwa, Sadock B. [4 ]
Hurtado, Anicia Q. [3 ]
Msuya, Flower E. [4 ]
Stentiford, Grant D. [5 ,6 ]
Cottier-Cook, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
机构
[1] SAMS, Blue Econ, Oban, Argyll, Scotland
[2] Univ Malaya, IOES, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[3] Southeast Asian Fisheries Dev Ctr, Aquaculture Dept SEAFDEC AQD, Iloilo, Philippines
[4] Univ Dar es Salaam, Dept Bot, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[5] Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquaculture Sci Cefas, Int Ctr Excellence Aquat Anim Hlth, Barrack Rd, Weymouth DT4 8UB, Dorset, England
[6] Univ Exeter, Ctr Sustainable Aquaculture Futures, Geoffrey Pope Bldg,Stocker Rd, Exeter EX4 4QD, Devon, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Seaweed; Aquaculture; Biosecurity; Policy; Carrageenophyte; CROP LOSSES; CULTIVATION; DISEASES; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10811-019-02010-5
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Each year a significant proportion of global food production is lost to pests and diseases, with concerted efforts by government and industry focussed on application of effective biosecurity policies which attempt to minimise their emergence and spread. In aquaculture the volume of seaweeds produced is second only to farmed fish and red algal carrageenophytes currently represent approximately 42% of global production of all seaweeds. Despite this importance, expansion of the seaweed sector is increasingly limited by the high prevalence of recalcitrant diseases and epiphytic pests with potential to emerge and with the demonstrated propensity to spread, particularly in the absence of effective national and international biosecurity policies. Developing biosecurity policy and legislation to manage biosecurity risk in seaweed aquaculture is urgently required to limit these impacts. To understand current international biosecurity frameworks and their efficacy, existing legislative frameworks were analysed quantitatively for the content of biosecurity measures, applicability to the seaweed industry, and inclusion of risks posed by diseases, pests and non-native species. Deficiencies in existing frameworks included the following: inconsistent terminology for inclusion of cultivated seaweeds, unclear designation of implementation responsibility, insufficient evidence-based information and limited alignment of biosecurity hazards and risks. Given the global importance of the cultivation of various seaweeds in alleviating poverty in low and middle income countries, it is crucial that the relatively low-unit value of the industry (i.e. as compared with other aquatic animal sectors) should not conflate with a perceived low risk of disease or pest transfer, nor the subsequent economic and environmental impact that disease transfer may impact on receiving nations (well beyond their seaweed operations). Developing a clear basis for development of robust international biosecurity policies related to the trade in seaweeds arising from the global aquaculture industry, by first addressing the gaps highlighted in this study, will be crucial in limiting impacts of pests and diseases on this valuable industry and on natural capital in locations where seaweeds are farmed.
引用
收藏
页码:2133 / 2146
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Biosecurity policy and legislation for the global seaweed aquaculture industry
    Iona Campbell
    Cicilia S. B. Kambey
    Jonalyn P. Mateo
    Sadock B. Rusekwa
    Anicia Q. Hurtado
    Flower E. Msuya
    Grant D. Stentiford
    Elizabeth J. Cottier-Cook
    [J]. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2020, 32 : 2133 - 2146
  • [2] Biosecurity policy and legislation of the seaweed aquaculture industry in Tanzania
    Rusekwa, Sadock B.
    Campbell, Iona
    Msuya, Flower E.
    Buriyo, Amelia S.
    Cottier-Cook, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYCOLOGY, 2020, 32 (06) : 4411 - 4422
  • [3] Biosecurity policy and legislation of the seaweed aquaculture industry in Tanzania
    Sadock B. Rusekwa
    Iona Campbell
    Flower E. Msuya
    Amelia S. Buriyo
    Elizabeth J. Cottier-Cook
    [J]. Journal of Applied Phycology, 2020, 32 : 4411 - 4422
  • [4] An international evaluation of biosecurity management capacity in the seaweed aquaculture industry
    Campbell, I.
    Mateo, J.
    Rusekwa, S. B.
    Kambey, C. S. B.
    Hurtado, A.
    Msuya, F. E.
    Cottier-Cook, E. J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 304
  • [5] Evaluating biosecurity policy implementation in the seaweed aquaculture industry of Malaysia, using the quantitative knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) survey technique
    Kambey, Cicilia S. B.
    Campbell, Iona
    Cottier-Cook, Elizabeth J.
    Nor, Adibi R. M.
    Kassim, Azhar
    Sade, Ahemad
    Lim, Phaik-Eem
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2021, 134
  • [6] Biosecurity baseline for a sustainable development of seaweed aquaculture in Latin America
    Mendez, Cynthia
    Bustamante, Danilo E.
    Calderon, Martha S.
    Gauna, Cecilia
    Hayashi, Leila
    Robledo, Daniel
    Tapia-Larios, Claudia
    Campbell, Iona
    Westermeier, Renato
    Murua, Pedro
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2024, 159
  • [7] Biosecurity Versus Profits: A Multiobjective Model for the Aquaculture Industry
    Dresdner, Jorge
    Estay, Manuel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE WORLD AQUACULTURE SOCIETY, 2016, 47 (01) : 61 - 73
  • [8] The role of aquaculture farm biosecurity in global food security
    Osborn, A.
    Henry, J.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2019, 38 (02): : 571 - 587
  • [9] Building a sustainable aquaculture industry in South Africa: the role of biosecurity
    Christison, K. W.
    [J]. REVUE SCIENTIFIQUE ET TECHNIQUE-OFFICE INTERNATIONAL DES EPIZOOTIES, 2019, 38 (02): : 589 - 600
  • [10] Identifying challenges of the US domestic seaweed aquaculture industry
    Kotowicz, Dawn M.
    Concepcion, Anoushka
    Bradt, Gabriella
    Chadsey, Meg
    Clemetson, Antionette
    Good, Melissa
    Reitsma, Joshua
    Robidoux, Jaclyn
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2024, 593