Biosecurity policy and legislation for the global seaweed aquaculture industry

被引:42
|
作者
Campbell, Iona [1 ]
Kambey, Cicilia S. B. [2 ]
Mateo, Jonalyn P. [3 ]
Rusekwa, Sadock B. [4 ]
Hurtado, Anicia Q. [3 ]
Msuya, Flower E. [4 ]
Stentiford, Grant D. [5 ,6 ]
Cottier-Cook, Elizabeth J. [1 ]
机构
[1] SAMS, Blue Econ, Oban, Argyll, Scotland
[2] Univ Malaya, IOES, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
[3] Southeast Asian Fisheries Dev Ctr, Aquaculture Dept SEAFDEC AQD, Iloilo, Philippines
[4] Univ Dar es Salaam, Dept Bot, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
[5] Ctr Environm Fisheries & Aquaculture Sci Cefas, Int Ctr Excellence Aquat Anim Hlth, Barrack Rd, Weymouth DT4 8UB, Dorset, England
[6] Univ Exeter, Ctr Sustainable Aquaculture Futures, Geoffrey Pope Bldg,Stocker Rd, Exeter EX4 4QD, Devon, England
基金
英国生物技术与生命科学研究理事会;
关键词
Seaweed; Aquaculture; Biosecurity; Policy; Carrageenophyte; CROP LOSSES; CULTIVATION; DISEASES; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10811-019-02010-5
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
Each year a significant proportion of global food production is lost to pests and diseases, with concerted efforts by government and industry focussed on application of effective biosecurity policies which attempt to minimise their emergence and spread. In aquaculture the volume of seaweeds produced is second only to farmed fish and red algal carrageenophytes currently represent approximately 42% of global production of all seaweeds. Despite this importance, expansion of the seaweed sector is increasingly limited by the high prevalence of recalcitrant diseases and epiphytic pests with potential to emerge and with the demonstrated propensity to spread, particularly in the absence of effective national and international biosecurity policies. Developing biosecurity policy and legislation to manage biosecurity risk in seaweed aquaculture is urgently required to limit these impacts. To understand current international biosecurity frameworks and their efficacy, existing legislative frameworks were analysed quantitatively for the content of biosecurity measures, applicability to the seaweed industry, and inclusion of risks posed by diseases, pests and non-native species. Deficiencies in existing frameworks included the following: inconsistent terminology for inclusion of cultivated seaweeds, unclear designation of implementation responsibility, insufficient evidence-based information and limited alignment of biosecurity hazards and risks. Given the global importance of the cultivation of various seaweeds in alleviating poverty in low and middle income countries, it is crucial that the relatively low-unit value of the industry (i.e. as compared with other aquatic animal sectors) should not conflate with a perceived low risk of disease or pest transfer, nor the subsequent economic and environmental impact that disease transfer may impact on receiving nations (well beyond their seaweed operations). Developing a clear basis for development of robust international biosecurity policies related to the trade in seaweeds arising from the global aquaculture industry, by first addressing the gaps highlighted in this study, will be crucial in limiting impacts of pests and diseases on this valuable industry and on natural capital in locations where seaweeds are farmed.
引用
收藏
页码:2133 / 2146
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Government policy - Canadian legislation faces industry opposition
    不详
    [J]. EUROPEAN CHEMICAL NEWS, 1997, 67 (1751): : 34 - 34
  • [32] The effects of legislation and policy in New Zealand and Australia on biosecurity and arthropod biological control research and development
    Goldson, S. L.
    Frampton, E. R.
    Ridley, G. S.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONTROL, 2010, 52 (03) : 241 - 244
  • [33] Aquaculture Law and Policy: Global, Regional and National Perspectives
    Howarth, William
    [J]. OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2018, 32 (01): : 590 - 597
  • [34] Mapping the global mass flow of seaweed: Cultivation to industry application
    Janke, Liam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY, 2024,
  • [35] GLOBAL INITIATIVE FOR SAFEGUARDING THE FUTURE OF THE SEAWEED INDUSTRY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES
    Cottier-Cook, E. J.
    Gachon, C. M. M.
    Bass, D.
    Stentiford, G.
    Brodie, J.
    Shaxson, L.
    Msuya, F. E.
    Hurtado, A. Q.
    Gerung, G.
    Nagabhatla, N.
    [J]. PHYCOLOGIA, 2017, 56 (04) : 35 - 36
  • [36] A Retrospective Review of Global Commercial Seaweed Production-Current Challenges, Biosecurity and Mitigation Measures and Prospects
    Sugumaran, Rajeena
    Padam, Birdie Scott
    Yong, Wilson Thau Lym
    Saallah, Suryani
    Ahmed, Kamruddin
    Yusof, Nur Athirah
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (12)
  • [37] How a holobiome perspective could promote intensification, biosecurity and eco-efficiency in the shrimp aquaculture industry
    Gutierrez-Perez, Eric D.
    Vazquez-Juarez, Ricardo
    Magallon-Barajas, Francisco J.
    Martinez-Mercado, Miguel A.
    Escobar-Zepeda, Alejandra
    Magallon-Servin, Paola
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [38] The Australian quarantine and biosecurity legislation: Constitutionality and critique
    Gray, Anthony
    [J]. JOURNAL OF LAW AND MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (04) : 788 - 810
  • [39] Ocean sprawl: The global footprint of shellfish and algae aquaculture and its implications for production, environmental impact, and biosecurity
    Harvey, M.
    Barrett, L. T.
    Morris, R. L.
    Swearer, S. E.
    Dempster, T.
    [J]. AQUACULTURE, 2024, 586
  • [40] A new Progressive Management Pathway for improving seaweed biosecurity
    Elizabeth J. Cottier-Cook
    Jennefe P. Cabarubias
    Janina Brakel
    Juliet Brodie
    Alejandro H. Buschmann
    Iona Campbell
    Alan T. Critchley
    Chad L. Hewitt
    Jie Huang
    Anicia Q. Hurtado
    Cicilia S. B. Kambey
    Phaik Eem Lim
    Tao Liu
    Jonalyn P. Mateo
    Flower E. Msuya
    Zizhong Qi
    Louise Shaxson
    Grant D. Stentiford
    Melba G. Bondad-Reantaso
    [J]. Nature Communications, 13