Assessment of PV technologies outdoor performance and commercial software estimation in hot and dry climates

被引:11
|
作者
Othman, Radwa [1 ,2 ]
Hatem, Tarek M. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Schneider Elect, Second Dist,Fifth Settlement, Cairo 11835, Egypt
[2] British Univ Egypt, Ctr Simulat Innovat & Adv Mfg, Cairo 11837, Egypt
[3] British Univ Egypt, Fac Energy & Environm Engn, Cairo 11837, Egypt
关键词
Photovoltaic; Poly-crystalline; Mono-crystalline; Thin-film CdTe; PV degradation; Hot and dry climate; SILICON PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES; DEGRADATION; SYSTEM; ENERGY; EFFICIENCY; EXPOSURE; PANELS; SOUTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130819
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Photovoltaic (PV) technologies have become an essential part of the global effort to compact climate change. While the MENA region, and in particular Egypt, has been one of the main target locations for PV system installations; because of the region's tremendous potential for solar energy and its location on the sunbelt. Yet, a gap in both literature and long-term industrial experience of PV technologies' installation in this particular region calls for investigation. Therefore, this work focuses on two main objectives: first, conducting an evaluation of long-term outdoor performance of three grid-connected photovoltaic systems (i.e. poly-crystalline, mono crystalline, and thin-film Cadmium Telluride) installed on the same rooftop in Cairo, Egypt, since October 2013. In which, the three systems will be compared in terms of yield, degradation rate, modules efficiency, and temperature power coefficient. The second objective is to compare the performance of commonly-used commercial software packages (i.e. PVSyst, PVSol, and SMA Sunny Design Web) to the output of the three PV systems mentioned above.In terms of degradation, the average yield degradation value was 1.19%/year, 1.17%/year, and 1.67%/year for poly-crystalline, mono-crystallin, and thin-film Cadmium Telluride respectively. For degradation against temperature, the rates were 1.53%/C/kW(p), 1.22%/C/kW(p), and 1.06%/C/kW(p) for the three systems respectively. As for software packages estimation, all three software tend to produce a reasonably accurate annual estimation but they become significantly less accurate with the monthly estimation. The annual errors of the three software ranged from-6.99% to +4.65% which is consistent with the literature. However, the monthly error introduced in this study of the three software ranged from-23.71% to +22.22%.The current work lays down the foundation to enhance PV systems' performance in hot and dry climates, as well as, calls for more accurate models for different PV technologies, especially for hot and dry climates.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Comparative Assessment of the Productive Performance of Three Solar PV Technologies at Gatton
    Wild, Phillip
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2016 AUSTRALASIAN UNIVERSITIES POWER ENGINEERING CONFERENCE (AUPEC), 2016,
  • [32] Evaluating the performance of outdoor shading devices on human thermal comfort in hot humid climates: A case study of Dhahran
    Al Tahir, Islam
    El Fattah, Ahmed Abd
    Mohammed, Mohammed
    Asif, Mohammad
    Almahdy, Omar
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2025, 271
  • [33] Experimental investigation of observed defects in crystalline silicon PV modules under outdoor hot dry climatic conditions in Algeria
    Bouraiou, Ahmed
    Hamouda, Messaoud
    Chaker, Abdelkader
    Necaibia, Ammar
    Mostefaoui, Mohammed
    Boutasseta, Nadir
    Ziane, Abderrezzaq
    Dabou, Rachid
    Sahouane, Nordine
    Lachtar, Salah
    SOLAR ENERGY, 2018, 159 : 475 - 487
  • [34] PV Systems in Warm and Sunny Climates: Performance Assessment of Commercially Available Solar Photovoltaic Technologies under Different Climatic Conditions in the Brazilian Energy Mix
    do Nascimento, Lucas Rafael
    Braga, Marilia
    Dolla, Ruany
    Campos, Rafael Antunes
    Ruther, Ricardo
    2018 IEEE 7TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY CONVERSION (WCPEC) (A JOINT CONFERENCE OF 45TH IEEE PVSC, 28TH PVSEC & 34TH EU PVSEC), 2018, : 0103 - 0108
  • [35] Evaluation of the Performance of Polycrystalline and Monocrystalline PV Technologies in a Hot and Arid Region: An Experimental Analysis
    Benghanem, Mohamed
    Haddad, Sofiane
    Alzahrani, Ahmed
    Mellit, Adel
    Almohamadi, Hamad
    Khushaim, Muna
    Aida, Mohamed Salah
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (20)
  • [36] Naturally comfortable and sustainable: Informed design guidance and performance labeling for passive commercial buildings in hot climates
    Rackes, Adams
    Melo, Ana Paula
    Lamberts, Roberto
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2016, 174 : 256 - 274
  • [37] Performance Study of Dynamic Intake and Exhaust Façades in Hot and Dry Climates: Iraq Case Study
    Hosseinalipour, S. M.
    Asiaei, S.
    Al-Taee, Ammar A. Hussain
    FRONTIERS IN HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2024, 22 : 747 - 767
  • [38] Outdoor organic photovoltaic module characteristics: Benchmarking against other PV technologies for performance, calculation of Ross coefficient and outdoor stability monitoring
    Bristow, N.
    Kettle, J.
    SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2018, 175 : 52 - 59
  • [39] Performance assessment of different solar photovoltaic technologies under similar outdoor conditions
    Sharma, Vikrant
    Kumar, Arun
    Sastry, O. S.
    Chandel, S. S.
    ENERGY, 2013, 58 : 511 - 518
  • [40] Performance Assessment of PV Technologies and Complementarity of Utility-Scale PV and Wind Power Plants in Brazil
    Campos, Rafael A.
    do Nascimento, Lucas R.
    Braga, Marilia
    Simoes, Gabriel
    Ruther, Ricardo
    2018 IEEE 7TH WORLD CONFERENCE ON PHOTOVOLTAIC ENERGY CONVERSION (WCPEC) (A JOINT CONFERENCE OF 45TH IEEE PVSC, 28TH PVSEC & 34TH EU PVSEC), 2018, : 1173 - 1178