Development of Control Systems for Safety Instrumented Systems

被引:4
|
作者
Squillante Junior, R. [1 ]
Santos Filho, D. J. [2 ]
Junqueira, F. [2 ]
Miyagi, P. E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Orion Consultoria & Engn Automacao Ltda, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Escola Politecn, PMR, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
safety instrumented system; critical fault diagnosis; critical fault treatment; Bayesian network; Petri net; PETRI NETS; ELEMENTARY; SIPHONS;
D O I
10.1109/TLA.2011.5993727
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Safety Instrumented Systems (SIS) are designed to prevent and / or mitigate accidents, avoiding undesirable high potential risk scenarios, assuring protection of people's health, protecting the environment and saving costs of industrial equipment. The design of these systems require formal methods for ensuring the safety requirements, but according material published in this area, has not identified a consolidated procedure to match the task. This sense, this article introduces a formal method for diagnosis and treatment of critical faults based on Bayesian network (BN) and Petri net (PN). This approach considers diagnosis and treatment for each safety instrumented function (SIF) including hazard and operability (HAZOP) study in the equipment or system under control. It also uses BN and Behavioral Petri net (BPN) for diagnoses and decision-making and the PN for the synthesis, modeling and control to be implemented by Safety Programmable Logic Controller (PLC). An application example considering the diagnosis and treatment of critical faults is presented and illustrates the methodology proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:451 / 457
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Safety-Instrumented Systems: Focus on Measurement Diagnostics
    Brown, Stephen
    Menezes, Mark
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 120 (04) : 58 - 63
  • [32] Accidents lead to modern safety-instrumented systems
    Gruhn, P
    INTECH, 1999, 46 (01) : 48 - +
  • [33] Evaluation of safety instrumented systems using reliability analysis
    Jin, SH
    Yeo, YK
    Moon, I
    Chung, Y
    Kim, IW
    PROCESS SAFETY PROGRESS, 2003, 22 (03) : 169 - 173
  • [34] Determining optimal prooftest strategies for Safety Instrumented Systems
    Machleidt, Konstantin
    Litz, Lothar
    ATP EDITION, 2012, (11): : 28 - 35
  • [35] A new approach to the reliability analysis of safety instrumented systems
    Leifeld, Thomas
    Schlegel, Jan
    Zhang, Ping
    AT-AUTOMATISIERUNGSTECHNIK, 2016, 64 (06) : 457 - 466
  • [36] Uncertainty assessment of reliability estimates for safety instrumented systems
    Jin, H.
    Lundteigen, M. A.
    Rausand, M.
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 2213 - 2221
  • [37] Modeling patterns for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems
    Meng, Huixing
    Kloul, Leila
    Rauzy, Antoine
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 180 : 111 - 123
  • [38] Inspection of the uncertainty of measurement instruments in safety instrumented systems
    Hauff, Thomas
    Liang, Wushan
    Strauss, Matthias
    Brecher, Christian
    Obdenbusch, Markus
    ATP EDITION, 2013, (1-2): : 38 - 45
  • [39] Smart instruments in safety instrumented systems - Sellafield experiences
    Nobes, Tom S.
    MEASUREMENT & CONTROL, 2008, 41 (06): : 179 - 183
  • [40] Demand rate and risk reduction for safety instrumented systems
    Hokstad, Per
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2014, 127 : 12 - 20