Outpatient induction of labour in the UK: a survey of practice

被引:24
|
作者
Sharp, Andrew N. [1 ]
Stock, Sarah J. [2 ]
Alfirevic, Zarko [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Womens Hosp, Univ Dept, Dept Women & Childrens Hlth Res, Crown St, Liverpool L8 7SS, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, UK MRC Ctr Reprod Hlth, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Induction of labour; Outpatient induction of labour; WOMEN; GEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.023
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify the current UK use of outpatient procedures for cervical ripening prior to induction of labour. Study design: Postal survey of consultant led obstetric units within the United Kingdom. A questionnaire was sent by post to 210 NHS consultant led obstetric units within the UK. Units that provided outpatient induction of labour (OP IOL) were asked complete a series of questions defining their protocol for risk stratification and management. Results: The survey had a 78% response rate. 17.6% of units stated that they currently or soon will provide OP IOL. All units were willing to provide OP IOL for post-dates singleton pregnancies and none provided this service for women with a previous caesarean or multiple pregnancy. 96% of inductions were initiated in a hospital setting prior to discharge home. 84% of units used Propess (R) to initiate OP IOL and 96% had a fetal assessment with CTG. Only 40% of units had a clear mechanism for assessment once the woman had gone home. 72% of units performed regular audit of their practice. Conclusions: We suggest that robust comparative research within a UK context is urgently required to establish the safety and cost effectiveness of outpatient induction of labour before this technique becomes fully embedded in clinical care without an adequate evidence base. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 23
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The management of accidental dural puncture during labour epidural analgesia: a survey of UK practice
    Baraz, R
    Collis, RE
    ANAESTHESIA, 2005, 60 (07) : 673 - 679
  • [22] Experience of induction of labour: a cross-sectional postnatal survey of women at UK maternity units
    Harkness, Mairi
    Yuill, Cassandra
    Cheyne, Helen
    McCourt, Christine
    Black, Mairead
    Pasupathy, Dharmintra
    Sanders, Julia
    Heera, Neelam
    Wallace, Chlorice
    Stock, Sarah Jane
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [23] Induction of labour in outpatient setting in District General Hospital
    Rao, Anita C.
    Joshi, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 : 7 - 7
  • [24] Pharmacological and mechanical interventions for labour induction in outpatient settings
    Vogel, Joshua P.
    Osoti, Alfred O.
    Kelly, Anthony J.
    Livio, Stefania
    Norman, Jane E.
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (09):
  • [25] Indications for Induction of Labour : (as in Common Practice)
    Hayat, T.
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2010, 16 (01): : 32 - 36
  • [26] National review of urology outpatient practice in the UK
    Gilmore, PE
    Shackley, DC
    Clarke, NW
    Betts, CD
    O'Flynn, KJ
    POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 81 (951) : 55 - 57
  • [27] Foley catheter for induction of labour: a UK observational study
    Stephenson, Elizabeth
    Borakati, Aditya
    Simpson, Ian
    Eedarapalli, Padma
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2020, 40 (08) : 1064 - 1068
  • [28] Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
    Kelly, Anthony J.
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Dowswell, Therese
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2009, (02):
  • [29] Outpatient versus inpatient induction of labour for improving birth outcomes
    Kelly, Anthony J.
    Alfirevic, Zarko
    Ghosh, Arpita
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (11):
  • [30] A resource audit of labour induction at two hospitals in the UK
    Robson, MS
    PatersonBrown, S
    Maslen, T
    Holmes, J
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 104 : 13 - 19