Outpatient induction of labour in the UK: a survey of practice

被引:24
|
作者
Sharp, Andrew N. [1 ]
Stock, Sarah J. [2 ]
Alfirevic, Zarko [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Womens Hosp, Univ Dept, Dept Women & Childrens Hlth Res, Crown St, Liverpool L8 7SS, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Edinburgh, UK MRC Ctr Reprod Hlth, Edinburgh, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
Induction of labour; Outpatient induction of labour; WOMEN; GEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.06.023
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To identify the current UK use of outpatient procedures for cervical ripening prior to induction of labour. Study design: Postal survey of consultant led obstetric units within the United Kingdom. A questionnaire was sent by post to 210 NHS consultant led obstetric units within the UK. Units that provided outpatient induction of labour (OP IOL) were asked complete a series of questions defining their protocol for risk stratification and management. Results: The survey had a 78% response rate. 17.6% of units stated that they currently or soon will provide OP IOL. All units were willing to provide OP IOL for post-dates singleton pregnancies and none provided this service for women with a previous caesarean or multiple pregnancy. 96% of inductions were initiated in a hospital setting prior to discharge home. 84% of units used Propess (R) to initiate OP IOL and 96% had a fetal assessment with CTG. Only 40% of units had a clear mechanism for assessment once the woman had gone home. 72% of units performed regular audit of their practice. Conclusions: We suggest that robust comparative research within a UK context is urgently required to establish the safety and cost effectiveness of outpatient induction of labour before this technique becomes fully embedded in clinical care without an adequate evidence base. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 23
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Induction of labour for MTOP for fetal abnormality - survey of practice in South Wales, UK
    Karapanos, I
    Nair, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 34 - 35
  • [2] Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK
    Harkness, M.
    Yuill, C.
    Cheyne, H.
    Stock, S. J.
    McCourt, C.
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [3] Induction of labour during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national survey of impact on practice in the UK
    M. Harkness
    C. Yuill
    H. Cheyne
    S. J. Stock
    C. McCourt
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21
  • [4] Outpatient labour induction
    Wilkinson, Chris
    BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2021, 77 : 15 - 26
  • [5] Outpatient Induction Labour
    Vickstrom-Bolin, M.
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2025, 65
  • [6] Provision and practice of specialist preterm labour clinics: a UK survey of practice
    Sharp, A. N.
    Alfirevic, Z.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2014, 121 (04) : 417 - 421
  • [7] OUTPATIENT EXAMINATION OF THE UPPER AIRWAY - A SURVEY OF CURRENT PRACTICE IN THE UK
    ALBIZZATI, C
    MILLS, R
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 1989, 103 (03): : 272 - 274
  • [8] Misoprostol for induction of labour: a survey of attitude and practice in southwestern Nigeria
    Fawole, Adeniran O.
    Adegbola, Omololu
    Adeyemi, Adewale S.
    Oladapo, Olufemi T.
    Alao, Moses O.
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2008, 278 (04) : 353 - 358
  • [9] Misoprostol for induction of labour: a survey of attitude and practice in southwestern Nigeria
    Adeniran O. Fawole
    Omololu Adegbola
    Adewale S. Adeyemi
    Olufemi T. Oladapo
    Moses O. Alao
    Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2008, 278 : 353 - 358
  • [10] Outpatient induction of labour: an audit on efficacy and safety outcome from a tertiary unit in the UK
    Drymiotou, S.
    Towolawi, A.
    Sideris, M.
    Hogg, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2017, 124 : 107 - 107