Preferences of the Public for Sharing Health Data: Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:13
|
作者
Johansson, Jennifer Viberg [1 ]
Bentzen, Heidi Beate [2 ]
Shah, Nisha [3 ]
Haraldsdottir, Eik [4 ]
Jonsdottir, Guobjorg Andrea [4 ]
Kaye, Jane [3 ,5 ]
Mascalzoni, Deborah [1 ,6 ]
Veldwijk, Jorien [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Uppsala Univ, Ctr Res Eth & Bioeth, Dept Publ Hlth & Caring Sci, Box 564, SE-75122 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Oslo, Norwegian Res Ctr Comp & Law, Fac Law, Oslo, Norway
[3] Univ Oxford, Ctr Hlth Law & Emerging Technol, Fac Law, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Iceland, Social Sci Res Inst, Reykjavik, Iceland
[5] Univ Melbourne, Ctr Hlth Law & Emerging Technol, Melbourne Law Sch, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Inst Biomed, Bolzano, Italy
[7] Erasmus Univ, Erasmus Sch Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
preferences; discrete choice experiment; health data; secondary use; willingness to share; LATENT CLASS MODEL; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; PRIVACY; CARE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.2196/29614
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Digital technological development in the last 20 years has led to significant growth in digital collection, use, and sharing of health data. To maintain public trust in the digital society and to enable acceptable policy-making in the future, it is important to investigate people's preferences for sharing digital health data. Objective: The aim of this study is to elicit the preferences of the public in different Northern European countries (the United Kingdom, Norway, Iceland, and Sweden) for sharing health information in different contexts. Methods: Respondents in this discrete choice experiment completed several choice tasks, in which they were asked if data sharing in the described hypothetical situation was acceptable to them. Latent class logistic regression models were used to determine attribute-level estimates and heterogeneity in preferences. We calculated the relative importance of the attributes and the predicted acceptability for different contexts in which the data were shared from the estimates. Results: In the final analysis, we used 37.83% (1967/5199) questionnaires. All attributes influenced the respondents' willingness to share health information (P<.001). The most important attribute was whether the respondents were informed about their data being shared. The possibility of opting out from sharing data was preferred over the opportunity to consent (opt-in). Four classes were identified in the latent class model, and the average probabilities of belonging were 27% for class 1, 32% for class 2, 23% for class 3, and 18% for class 4. The uptake probability varied between 14% and 85%, depending on the least to most preferred combination of levels. Conclusions: Respondents from different countries have different preferences for sharing their health data regarding the value of a review process and the reason for their new use. Offering respondents information about the use of their data and the possibility to opt out is the most preferred governance mechanism.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Allocating external financing for health: a discrete choice experiment of stakeholder preferences
    Grepin, Karen A.
    Pinkstaff, Crossley B.
    Hole, Arne Risa
    Henderson, Klara
    Norheim, Ole Frithjof
    Rottingen, John-Arne
    Ottersen, Trygve
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY AND PLANNING, 2018, 33 : i24 - i30
  • [32] DO QALYS REFLECT PREFERENCES FOR HEALTH OUTCOMES: A DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT
    Viney, Rosalie C.
    Savage, Elizabeth J.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (09) : 1499 - 1499
  • [33] Patient Preferences for Provider Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline M.
    Atherly, Adam J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MANAGED CARE, 2020, 26 (07): : E219 - +
  • [34] Patient Preferences for Provider Choice: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    van den Broek-Altenburg, Eline
    Atherly, Adam
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2020, 13 (01): : 142 - 142
  • [35] Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Nicolet, Anna
    Perraudin, Clemence
    Wagner, Joel
    Gilles, Ingrid
    Krucien, Nicolas
    Peytremann-Bridevaux, Isabelle
    Marti, Joachim
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2022, 15 (04): : 485 - 496
  • [36] Public Preferences for Allocating Ventilators in an Intensive Care Unit: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Norman, Richard
    Robinson, Suzanne
    Dickinson, Helen
    Williams, Iestyn
    Meshcheriakova, Elena
    Manipis, Kathleen
    Anstey, Matthew
    [J]. PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 14 (03): : 319 - 330
  • [37] Supporting family carers of people with dementia: A discrete choice experiment of public preferences
    Teahan, Aine
    Walsh, Sharon
    Doherty, Edel
    O'Shea, Eamon
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2021, 287
  • [38] Public preferences in healthcare resource allocation: A discrete choice experiment in South Korea
    Bae, Eun-Young
    Lim, Min Kyoung
    Lee, Boram
    Bae, Green
    Hong, Jihyung
    [J]. HEALTH POLICY, 2023, 138
  • [39] Public Preferences for Allocating Ventilators in an Intensive Care Unit: A Discrete Choice Experiment
    Richard Norman
    Suzanne Robinson
    Helen Dickinson
    Iestyn Williams
    Elena Meshcheriakova
    Kathleen Manipis
    Matthew Anstey
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2021, 14 : 319 - 330
  • [40] Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment
    Anna Nicolet
    Clémence Perraudin
    Joël Wagner
    Ingrid Gilles
    Nicolas Krucien
    Isabelle Peytremann-Bridevaux
    Joachim Marti
    [J]. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, 2022, 15 : 485 - 496